I would put the agencies' websites in three categories:
Excellent
These sites have a solid look and feel, clear contact information, consistent photo standards, are regularly updated and maintained and appear to be built with modern design principles and web technologies in mind. They set the standard.
http://www.cupidsescorts.ca/welcome.php - amazing design and technology, esp the Twitter feed module
http://www.gardenofedenescorts.com/www/home - slick clean interface, cool colours
http://www.mirage-escorts.com/welcome.htm - good site but the actual profile pages for the girls could be a lot better
http://www.selectcompanyescorts.com/gallery.php - very nice design
Standard
Most agency sites are here. These sites get the job done, but could be a lot better. Outdated technology, mediocre design, etc. But they have effective galleries, are updated regularly, and tell you what you need to know.
http://www.torontoplaygirls.com/playgirls.htm
http://dream-makers.ca/companions/ - old site was better, lightbox images too large
http://www.dev1.anonymousgfe.com/Home_Page.html
http://www.torontovixens.com/meet.php - a little complicated gallery
http://www.torontogirlfriends.com/home.php - very minimal
http://entourageladies.com/alegra.html - never updated with ladies info
http://torontopassions.com/www/gallery
http://kingofhearts.ca/www/gallery - (GOE, Toronto Passions and King of Hearts all designed by CASPindex.com)
http://www.roommates-escorts.com/girls.php
Some are just terrible
These are the least effective. They have hideous design, or a clear sense of incompleteness. Often something in the site doesn't work, or they just haven't been updated in a long time.
That's all I have for now...
Thanks for your thoughts on this topic.
I would put a little less emphasis on the design qualities of a web site, and a little more emphasis on information included and ease of use.
I like the Mirage site, for example, because of the quality of photos and the information that is included about the SP, including menu items available. I like menu items to be included because if certain items are left off, then no need to investigate further. If the items are in the menu, then I will proceed to verify with reviews to see if it is mostly ymmv situation or if it is consistent. However, the Mirage site loses marks imo because there is no schedule posted.
GOE site has all of the above, plus the posted schedule of the girls, plus it has links to reviews of the girls posted on terb. So it gets bonus marks for that, but one minor negative would be that the photos need to be double clicked for viewing. I prefer the way Mirage is set up with no clicking required - just scroll down and the photos are there.
While the Cupid site is nice to look at and the ladies are gorgeous, it doesn't include schedule info, there are no menu items listed, and the links for reviews go to another review site that I just wasted about 20 minutes trying unsuccessfully to register for. If I am not mistaken, one needs to write reviews before one can read the reviews. So Cupid's site loses marks in my mind because there is a lack of easily accessible info.
Another site feature that Dreammakers has is that it specifies if a girl has natural or enhanced boobs, as does GOE. Sure, its a minor point that is easily verifiable by calling and asking, or by reading reviews. But its time consuming when one is researching many girls on many web sites. I also like the feature on DM web site that allows you to search for certain characteristics or menu items.
Another web page that deserves mention in my mind is Sassy. Good photos that don't need to be clicked, full menu listing, schedule and rates, etc. But the colour is way off. I have to squint and lean forward to read the text, especially on a bright day when there is more ambient light in the room.
I think those are the most important points in my mind. In short, the best web pages have most or all of the following:
Menu listed
Clear description of girl
Rates
Schedule listed
Natural or enhanced
Good photos, no clicking
Links to reviews on terb
