Royal Spa

Professor arrested for viewing child porn on his laptop during crowded airline flight

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
(CNN) -- A Utah professor allegedly caught looking at child pornography during a Delta airlines flight said Monday at a court hearing that he is innocent, the Suffolk County, Massachusetts, District Attorney's office said.

A passenger aboard Grant D. Smith's Salt Lake City to Boston flight on Saturday spotted him looking at what appeared to be images of young girls, nude and performing sex acts, and alerted the flight crew and a family member, who in turn notified law enforcement, according to a statement from the district attorney's office.

When a flight attendant asked Smith to shut down his computer, he instead began deleting images from it, prosecutor Erik Bennett said, CNN affiliate WCVB reported. Police who met the plane were able to recover 66 images from the computer, said the station, citing authorities.

Smith's Apple MacBook Pro laptop and iphone were seized as evidence and investigators will seek a search warrant to examine their contents thoroughly, according to the statement.

"These weren't photos of a naked child in the bath that a parent might keep," said Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel Conley. "These were explicitly sexual and extremely disturbing."Troopers recovered from the computer a number of still images depicting young girls, some naked and some engaged in explicit sexual activity with adult males, Conley said in the news release. Based on captions embedded in the images and troopers’ estimates, the children depicted were between the ages of 5 and 14 years old.

During Monday's hearing, a judge imposed bail of $75,000 and ordered Smith to return to court on December 27. He pleaded not guilty.

If Smith posts bail, the judge ordered the father of two not have any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 16 or use the Internet for anything other than business purposes. He would also be required to allow law enforcement to search his personal and work computers at any time.

Smith, 47, is a professor of material science and engineering at the University of Utah. He has been placed on administrative leave pending resolution of the criminal case, the school said.

"Professor Smith deserves a full and fair investigation into this issue," the school said in a statement. "The University of Utah, however, has no tolerance for viewing or possessing of child pornography by any of its employees, regardless of where it occurs."

He will be fired if the allegations are proved to be true, the school said.

Smith received a bachelor's degree from the school in 1985 and finished his doctorate in 1990, according to the school's website.

He is also president of Wasatch Molecular Inc., a consulting company that helps companies develop advanced materials, according to the company's website.

He was previously an assistant professor at the University of Missouri in Columbia and a senior research scientist at the NASA Ames Research Center in California, according to his biography on the company's website.

He's been on the faculty at the University of Utah since 1997, according to his Wasatch biography.

A victim's advocate told WCVB that the brazen nature of the allegation is shocking.

"The notion that someone would be so bold as to view it in public is extraordinary, and I'm not sure what the explanation is," Wendy Murphy told the station.
 

LKD

Active member
Aug 6, 2006
5,061
8
38
may he rot and suffer in all aspects of life because of this.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
On an airplane in public???? Aside from the fact that he is a repulsive worm, I guess this just goes to show that getting a PhD does not mean that you are actually smart.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,068
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
A victim's advocate told WCVB that the brazen nature of the allegation is shocking.
Hope they throw the book at this POS!!!
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,068
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
He was just looking at pictures. Where's the harm in that?
Dude!
Great idea!
Why don't you do just that, then run your "Where's the harm in that" ....line by authorities....:rolleyes:
 

buttercup

Active member
Feb 28, 2005
2,570
11
38
may you rot in hell too for thinking there is no harm in looking at child porn.
Me, as well? And you didn't explain what harm he's done, simply by looking at the pictures, the thought of which arouses you to such heights of vengeance.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
Me, as well? And you didn't explain what harm he's done, simply by looking at the pictures, the thought of which arouses you to such heights of vengeance.
presumably these pics are not floating out there for free, but are being distributed by people and for people who are into it, so if you are looking at it, you indirectly cause a child somewhere out there to suffer
 

The Fruity Hare

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2002
5,110
33
48
Me, as well? And you didn't explain what harm he's done, simply by looking at the pictures, the thought of which arouses you to such heights of vengeance.
By downlaoding child porn he is creating a market for it. These children, often babies and others barely out of diapers are violently abused for the pleasure of sickos to view and trade photos.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
I'm not sure what the laws are in Utah but just in the U.S. alone they have one of the toughest laws in the world when it comes to this. He definitely will pay a big fine.
in Canada there is a minimum jail term for it
 

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
Me, as well? And you didn't explain what harm he's done, simply by looking at the pictures, the thought of which arouses you to such heights of vengeance.
John Stuart Mill's On Liberty (1859) addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. One argument that Mill develops further than any previous philosopher is the harm principle. The harm principle holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others.

Putting aside for a minute the vile nature of child porn, your argument that merely looking at any image harms no one is in contrast to the law. The authorities hold that if it were legal to view child porn then it would create a market for the creation of more such images, as people who otherwise wouldn't create images now would create them (or would create more of them) with profit as their motive. Thus, society feels that possession of child porn and viewing it DO cause harm to society even if the viewer is not creating images. By making it illegal, the hope is that fewer people will look at it and fewer images will be created.

In drugs, possession of coke is illegal, as is buying it or selling it or importing it or making it. If one was allowed to buy and possess and use coke legally, but only selling it or importing it or making it was illegal, the feeling would be that this would encourage more people to use it and more coke to be sold, imported and made.

In the U.S. the illegality of prositution exists for much the same reason - by making it illegal authorities hope to limit it, and if it was legal to pay for sex with consenting adults the authorities feel it would increase demand for SPs. In much of the world the governments take a view that what two consenting adults want to do is their business.

In the case of child porn or child prostitution though, the child is unable to give legal consent due to their age, so getting them to participate in the creation of child porn is considered (rightly imo) exploitative and illegal. Once they turn 18 they are considered free to consent to making porn by the authorities, and thus it is legal to buy regular adult porn. Under 18 they are considered not yet able to make that choice, thus if they are bribed or coached into making it, that is considered to be harming them, and harming society. Hence, buying or viewing such material is considered supporting its creation, and is also illegal as it harms the participant indirectly.

So yes, viewing still images of serious child porn on an crowded airline flight is illegal based on the harm to society theory.
 

The Fruity Hare

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2002
5,110
33
48
He was just looking at pictures. Where's the harm in that?
Apparently he realized the error of his ways as he started deleting the images before he was taken into custody. Maybe you could call the cops up and ask them why he shouldn't be viewing child porn, they might have an answer for you.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
John Stuart Mill's On Liberty (1859) addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. One argument that Mill develops further than any previous philosopher is the harm principle. The harm principle holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others.

Putting aside for a minute the vile nature of child porn, your argument that merely looking at any image harms no one is in contrast to the law. The authorities hold that if it were legal to view child porn then it would create a market for the creation of more such images, as people who otherwise wouldn't create images now would create them (or would create more of them) with profit as their motive. Thus, society feels that possession of child porn and viwing it DO cause harm to society even if the viewer is not creating images. By making it illegal, the hope is that fewer people will look at it and fewer images will be created.

In drugs, possession of coke is illegal, as is selling it or importing it or making it. If one was allowed to possess and use coke, but only selling it or making it was illegal, the feeling would be that this would encourage more people to use it and more coke to be sold, imported and made.

In the U.S. the illegality of prositution exists for much the same reason - by making it illegal authorities hope to limit it, and if it was legal to pay for sex with consenting adults the authorities feel it would increase demand for SPs. In much of the world the governments take a view that what two consenting adults want to do is their business.

In the case of child porn or child prostitution though, the child is unable to give legal consent due to their age, so getting them to participate in the creation of child porn is considered (rightly imo) exploitative and illegal. Once they turn 18 they are considered free to consent to making porn by the authorities, and thus it is legal to buy regular adult porn. Under 18 they are considered not yet able to make that choice, thus if they are bribed or coached into making it, that is considered to be harming them, and harming society. Hence, buying or viewing such material is considered supporting its creation, and is also illegal as it harms the participant indirectly.

So yes, viewing still images of serious child porn on an crowded airline flight is illegal based on the harm to society theory.
in Canada one is allowed to use coke (but not possess).
 

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
in Canada one is allowed to use coke (but not possess).
OK, so while a consumer will find it is illegal to buy coke or possess it on your person or in your property, if you happen to see some coke lying around on a coffee table and you take a snort of it in passing...
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
OK, so while a consumer will find it is illegal to buy coke or possess it on your person or in your property, if you happen to see some coke lying around on a coffee table and you take a snort of it in passing...
then you are golden
by the way you will find it happening to you more often if you are skinny and have big boobs :)

jokes aside though it is interesting that in the land of the free aka great US of A you can go to jail for it
 

Scarey

Well-known member
Man, what the hell is with these guys!?!?.For the last 9 days and counting I have opened a newspaper to see a story about someone getting busted watching/downloading/making available/producing child pornography.Either the police are getting better at catching them or these guys are breeding.
 
Toronto Escorts