Toronto Girlfriends

Pro-war Social Democrat-led government paves way for right-wing victory in Finnish elections

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,282
2,656
113
Ghawar
Jordan Shilton
4 April 2023

Finland formally joined NATO in a ceremony at its Brussels headquarters Tuesday, marking a massive escalation of the US-NATO war on Russia. The country’s rapid accession to the aggressive military alliance came just two days after the right-wing National Coalition Party triumphed in Sunday’s general election, setting the stage for a potential coalition government with the far-right Finns Party.

Underscoring the dominant role played by American imperialism in bringing the Nordic country into the military alliance, Finland’s outgoing Foreign Minister, Pekka Haavisto, handed his country’s formal commitment to join NATO to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. NATO’s border with Russia has more than doubled in length. Finland’s 1,300-kilometre border is now part of the front in the imperialist powers’ war to subjugate Russia to the status of a semi-colony and seize control of its natural resources.

In a speech at the ceremony, President Sauli Niinistö said, “The era of military nonalignment in our history has come to an end. A new era begins.”

It would have been more accurate to have stated that Finland is returning to the position it held in relation to the major imperialist powers in the decades immediately after independence, which was granted by the Bolsheviks shortly after the October Revolution in 1917. Finland first served as a major base of operations for the counterrevolutionary whites in the civil war, before going on to form an alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II as part of Hitler’s war of annihilation against the Soviet Union. Finland’s military nonalignment was a demand made by the Soviet Union in response to the invasion of Finnish troops alongside Nazi forces and their participation in the siege of Leningrad, now St. Petersburg, which lies just 250 kilometres from the Finnish border. The Stalinist bureaucracy feared that Finland could be used by German or American imperialism to launch military operations against the USSR following 1945.

Niinistö also made the improbable claim, “Finland’s membership is not targeted against anyone. Nor does it change the foundations or objectives of Finland’s foreign and security policy. Finland is a stable and predictable Nordic country that seeks peaceful resolution of disputes.”

The reality is that Finland’s accession to NATO is being accompanied by a massive military buildup throughout the Nordic and Baltic regions. In March, the US provocatively flew a nuclear-capable B-52 bomber close to the Russian island of Gogland just 40 kilometres off the Finnish coast. NATO troops will massively expand their presence in the region, and the US is seeking its own bilateral defence agreement to provide it with more latitude for military operations on Finnish territory. Helsinki has also started constructing a border fence with Russia, citing the alleged threat of “hybrid warfare” from immigrants crossing into the country. The ongoing push to bring Sweden into NATO will mean Russia is entirely surrounded by hostile adversaries in the strategically important Baltic Sea.

Finland’s NATO accession was the culmination of the pro-war legacy of the outgoing Social Democratic-led coalition government, which went down to defeat at the elections. Although the Social Democrats under the leadership of Prime Minister Sanna Marin gained three seats in parliament and improved slightly their share of the vote, their coalition partners saw their support plummet. This was particularly true of the Green League, whose representation fell from 20 to 13 deputies, and the ex-Stalinist Left Alliance, which saw its representation fall from 16 to 11. The rural-based Center Party, another coalition partner, also lost ground, dropping from 31 seats to 23.

The main winners were the conservative National Coalition Party, which gained 10 seats to finish with 48, and the far-right Finns Party with an increase of seven to 46 deputies. Since a majority of 101 is required to govern in the 200-seat parliament, the NCP will have to secure backing from a number of parties in order to finalize a new coalition government. Options include a coalition involving the Social Democrats or the Finns Party, which appears most likely. However, some smaller parties, including the Swedish People’s party, have previously indicated their refusal to enter government with the far right, who have ties to right-wing extremist and fascistic forces across Europe.

Whatever the composition of the new government, it will be one of austerity at home for the working class and war as Finland cements its status as a frontline state in NATO’s war with Russia. NCP leader and incoming Prime Minister Petteri Orpo is committed to finding €6 billion in public spending cuts during the next four-year parliamentary term. Orpo argues the savings can be made through public sector “enhancements” and forcing those out of work back into a job.

All of the established parties fully support Finland’s integration into NATO, a move that subordinates the country to the predatory interests of American and European imperialism. While the Social Democrats under Marin intensified the party’s long-standing support for NATO membership, the Finns are no less enthusiastic. In a policy paper released in August 2022, the party advocated a closer alliance with US imperialism to confront Russia and China in the Arctic. The paper also explicitly declared the party’s support for NATO membership.

The fact that the most likely outcome of government talks is a coalition involving the far-right Finns Party is a devastating indictment of the “progressive” politics of the Social Democrats and their allies in the Green League and misnamed Left Alliance. Marin, widely hailed as one of the youngest prime ministers in the world and held up as a symbol of diversity because she was raised by lesbian parents, headed a government that imposed attacks on the working class while arming Finland to the teeth and bringing it into NATO.

 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,326
6,111
113
Finland was wise to join so quickly- if somehow the GOPee end up in the Whitehouse they could have helped putin secure his borders and retake Finland
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,282
2,656
113
Ghawar
Support for Ukraine is bipartisan in Europe. Rising of the
right may not turn out to be a good thing though to the
business of Lockheed Martin and its ilk. Right-wingers
are more frugal when it comes to military buildup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: krealtarron

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,282
2,656
113
Ghawar
Finland was wise to join so quickly- if somehow the GOPee end up in the Whitehouse they could have helped putin secure his borders and retake Finland

It could turn out to be what voters in the U.S. want to see
in 2024. Saving money from military aid to Ukraine and even
better lifting oil sanctions so Big Oil can return to Russia to
revive dying oil field. That should help bring down gas prices
and make many U.S. citizens happy.
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,326
6,111
113
Support for Ukraine is bipartisan in Europe. Rising of the
right may not turn out to be a good thing though to the
business of Lockheed Martin and its ilk. Right-wingers
are more frugal when it comes to military buildup.
In the US the military is the only thing that the right wing wants to fund.
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,326
6,111
113
It could turn out to be what voters in the U.S. want to see
in 2024. Saving money from military aid to Ukraine and even
better lifting oil sanctions so Big Oil can return to Russia to
revive dying oil field. That should help bring down gas prices
and make many U.S. citizens happy.
Why would big oil want lower gas prices ? Right now I believe gas prices are healthy. When we were a dollar a litre oil companies were losing money and therefore cutting production
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,282
2,656
113
Ghawar
Why would big oil want lower gas prices ? Right now I believe gas prices are healthy. When we were a dollar a litre oil companies were losing money and therefore cutting production
If you are familiar with the oil business you should understand that
the more drilling the more profits for the CEOs even if overproduction
could lead to bankruptcy of small drillers and consequently layoffs
of those working in the field. CEOs do not make their money at the gas
pumps.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,076
28,283
113
It could turn out to be what voters in the U.S. want to see
in 2024. Saving money from military aid to Ukraine and even
better lifting oil sanctions so Big Oil can return to Russia to
revive dying oil field. That should help bring down gas prices
and make many U.S. citizens happy.
Ah, its all about Big Oil in the end.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,484
6,986
113
If you are familiar with the oil business you should understand that
the more drilling the more profits for the CEOs even if overproduction
could lead to bankruptcy of small drillers and consequently layoffs
of those working in the field. CEOs do not make their money at the gas
pumps.
Which IMO is a big part of the reason for Putin's invasion of Crimea.

p.s. Do you know how propagandist it is to portray joining a defensive alliance in fear of an expansionist neighbour as "Pro-war"?
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,944
5,386
113
Lewiston, NY
It could turn out to be what voters in the U.S. want to see
in 2024. Saving money from military aid to Ukraine and even
better lifting oil sanctions so Big Oil can return to Russia to
revive dying oil field. That should help bring down gas prices
and make many U.S. citizens happy.
Olive oil makes me happy,,,
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts