Blondie Massage Spa

Privacy? Who cares?

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...0feb20,0,5039697.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Privacy Guardian Is Still a Paper Tiger
A year after its creation, the White House civil liberties board has yet to do a single day of work.
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON — For Americans troubled by the prospect of federal agents eavesdropping on their phone conversations or combing through their Internet records, there is good news: A little-known board exists in the White House whose purpose is to ensure that privacy and civil liberties are protected in the fight against terrorism.

Someday, it might actually meet.


Initially proposed by the bipartisan commission that investigated the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board was created by the intelligence overhaul that President Bush signed into law in December 2004.

More than a year later, it exists only on paper.

Foot-dragging, debate over its budget and powers, and concern over the qualifications of some of its members — one was treasurer of Bush's first campaign for Texas governor — has kept the board from doing a single day of work.

On Thursday, after months of delay, the Senate Judiciary Committee took a first step toward standing up the fledgling watchdog, approving the two lawyers Bush nominated to lead the panel. But it may take months before the board is up and running and doing much serious work.

Critics say the inaction shows the administration is just going through the motions when it comes to civil liberties.

"They have stalled in giving the board adequate funding. They have stalled in making appointments," said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.). "It is apparent they are not taking this seriously."

The Sept. 11 commission also has expressed reservations about the commitment to the liberties panel.

"We felt it was absolutely vital," said Thomas H. Kean, the Republican former governor of New Jersey who led the commission. "We had certainly hoped it would have been up and running a long time ago."
Let's face it ... the president has the right to spy on whoever he wants whenever he wants and if you disagree, Dick Cheney might shoot you in the face.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Seems to me that unless you have reason to fear, why fear?
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
DonQuixote said:
Do you really trust the system? If you oppose
those in power then you have much to fear.
Aka. J. McCarthy and JE Hoover and R Nixon.
To be totally safe then live like a mushroom.

not at all
But I believe you need to keep it honest.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
DonQuixote said:
Sorry, pops. There are too many examples in
recent history to show one man's honesty is
another man's treason and sedition.
Paranoia will distroy ya
 
Toronto Escorts