Peggy Nash says Canada not 'normal' under Harper

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,095
2,946
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
OTTAWA — NDP leadership hopeful Peggy Nash says Canada is no longer a "normal" country under Prime Minister Stephen Harper's direction.

The Toronto MP describes Harper's Canada as a country of growing inequality, record personal debt, hopelessness among youth and a federal government that continually tells people to expect less.

"I don't think that's normal," Nash told The Canadian Press in a wide-ranging interview Thursday.

"I think that's wrong."

Nash said Canadians have a right to expect economic, social and environmental progress, where people co-operate with each other and the government doesn't pit one group against another.

"I think we can have that kind of normal country and I'm determined that I'm going to lead that."

Nash, one of nine contenders seeking to succeed Jack Layton, who died of cancer in August, declined to peg herself as being on the left, centre or right of her party. But the onetime senior negotiator for the Canadian Auto Workers appeared pleased with a Toronto Star columnist's description of her as a "practical radical."

The NDP's finance critic until jumping into the leadership race late last month, Nash offered detailed criticism of the Harper government's economic policies, including its opposition to a tax on financial transactions as a way to deter speculators, what she called "a shadow banking system."

"To me, it makes good sense to take a look at that ... Something that helps reduce speculation, stabilize the global economy is a positive thing."

Nash said speculators are making the sovereign debt crisis in Europe worse because they're essentially "betting that these governments are going to default" on their debts, thereby adding to the destabilization. And she argued that a small tax on "the very risky, dangerous, speculative activities" wouldn't be as onerous as Harper's Conservatives have made out.

The Tories have also maintained that a financial transaction tax would penalize Canadian banks, even though they were not part of the problem that led to the global economic meltdown in 2008. But Nash said the idea is to rein in global speculation, the repercussions of which are felt in Canada, whether or not our banks are to blame.

"We are not immune from the impact of the global economy," she pointed out. "If this reduced the likelihood of damaging speculation in Europe and helped produce greater stability, we would all benefit."

While the notion of a financial transaction tax has picked up some steam recently, with France and Germany pitching the idea for Europe, Nash noted that the key players in the global economy, notably the United States and United Kingdom, remain opposed. Nash said the tax needs to be globally applied to work.

Nash also said she thinks it's worth debating whether the Bank of Canada's monetary policy should continue to be aimed at keeping inflation at two per cent or less. She said the bank's mandate to keep inflation under strict control was adopted as a result of soaring interest rates in the early 1980s but, with economic conditions dramatically different now, she suggested it may be more appropriate to focus on employment levels or inequality.

"Like any policy, I think it's something we have to continually review, monitor and see if it continues to meet our needs."

Nash steered clear of two ideas floated by Brian Topp, the perceived frontrunner in the leadership contest. He has proposed hiking income taxes on the rich and has said he'd be willing to consider hiking the federal sales tax once the economy is on sounder footing.

Nash ruled out hiking the harmonized sales tax. As for taxing the rich more, Nash said only that she favours a "fair and progressive tax system," declining to comment specifically on "one-off" ideas.

Read more: http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/...not-normal-under-harper-111117/#ixzz1eOd2dcU8
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,095
2,946
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Gee that's swell.

What it would be with her as P.M. one shudders to think!
we would be similar to the Nordic countries with good quality of life.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,686
6,779
113
I've met Peggy on several occasions. I would hesitate to count her into the normal category either.
 

Doot

Member
Nov 19, 2011
532
0
18
She does have a bad track record when it comes to attendance in parliament. I don't count on her as being an effective NDP leader.
 

Possum Trot

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,093
1
0
She sounds like a real brain surgeon. Okay one down ....surely they can do better than this. What's the over/under on her IQ ? 100 ?
 

train

New member
Jul 29, 2002
6,992
0
0
Above 7
She's the NDP finance critic ?.....oh dear God. She wants to tax dangerous risky speculative activities? Does she not know that currency and commodity trading, selling short etc etc are already taxed at full rates? LMAO. This is priceless. You can't write this material.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Didn't need Peggy Nash to state the obvious.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,392
2,304
113
Normal is a relative term......if the Canada that was evolving prior to Harper was normal, then we are becoming abnormal. We were a leading edge country where many cultures mingled, peacekeeping was preferred to war making, pot was almost legal, sex was a personal freedom.... now, we are becoming more like Americans every day and Harper is leading the way .
 

train

New member
Jul 29, 2002
6,992
0
0
Above 7
Didn't need Peggy Nash to state the obvious.
Good thing because she doesn't recognize the obvious.....that she has no chance.
 

Relic

Unregistered User
Aug 20, 2011
245
0
0
I wonder if Peggy realizes that the current leader of her party is a washed up Separatist that can't even speak English.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,679
1,193
113
Toronto
Good thing because she doesn't recognize the obvious.....that she has no chance.
You don't understand how a party chooses the leader then, it's not based on polls or what the odds makers say.

McGuinty was fourth on the first and second ballots when he ran for leader of the Ontario Liberal party, then finally won on the 5th ballot. This means he wasn't the first or even second choice of very many delegates. It's very possible Nash or another candidate can do something similar.

Other people are running who know they don't stand a chance to win but they're maneuvering to become influential in the party. If they don't win, they aren't losers because they've gained something they didn't have before.
 

Relic

Unregistered User
Aug 20, 2011
245
0
0
Only people in England speak English as well, you make a good point.
What language do the majority of Canadians speak? And before you answer there is no such language as Canadian (although Obama probably doesn't know that).
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
Why would I need to speak French? I live in Canada not France.
You don't 'need' to speak french, but it certainly opens you to a whole new part and a rather substantial part of Canada's culture. If you want to live 9n a fish bowl and knit feel free.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
What language do the majority of Canadians speak? And before you answer there is no such language as Canadian (although Obama probably doesn't know that).
Well, there is Canadian english, just like there is American english, and British english. The first being very much a mixture of the other two; tire/tyre, curb/kerb, colour/color, defence/defense. The Canadian Oxford Dictionary is full of Canadian english. Before you off on another idiot rant, you might want to look up the linguistic term 'Canadian raising'.

We also can't forget the land of Aus and the Kiwi, both of whom speak particularly unique english.
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
36
Earth
We also can't forget the land of Aus and the Kiwi, both of whom speak particularly unique english.
They have unique accents in their spoken English and have some amusing words they have added. However, generally, their formal written English is UK English. My understanding is that many linguists would argue that UK English, American English and Canadian English are the distinct forms of English with most other English speaking countries speaking UK English.

Personally, I have often wondered how they would classify some Jamaican English as it really does not seem like any other English to me. However, having lived in NZ and having spent a few months in England, I have to agree with them that NZ English is pretty much UK English with some amusing terms added.
 
Toronto Escorts