Opinions/recommendations on pay sites for downloading music and videos

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
243
63
Hey I've been using Kazaa for a long time, switched to limewire and now thinking of switching again. Limewire's not bad. But I'm just wondering if pay sites such as soulseek are any better in terms of quality of files in terms of bit rates, downloading speeds, files being correctly named, files being what they actually claim to be, variety etc.

Anyways, just thinking that perhaps this something for nothing attitude is hindering my downloading.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
243
63
Found myself at the wikipediea website and took the link to the soulseek site. I was surprised because in the past I ended up at pay pages. DLed the free program and away I'm running.

It'll take some time to see how it goes but so far the selection seems more eclectic which is nice.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Soulseek was pretty good and free when I used it a few years ago. You can get any type of music you can imagine there, just not sure how it's running now.
Torrents are the best free way to go now. You can find anything you want there, with very little chance of getting bogus missnamed files. I like the way you get full albums in any bitrate you desire and many come with the album covers, etc. Dummy and bogus files are weeded out pretty well on Torrent sites, unlike the Kazaa network that is being flooded with junk files.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net

PHNINE

Banned
Aug 27, 2005
5,462
0
0
Penthouse
With all the crap that is on the free sites, the preservation of your hard drive from viruses really makes you wonder what happened to the good old days of free content. Downloading has become such a chore that it is so much easier to just pay for it. Some sites charge per download, and some charge a flat rate for unlimited downloads. Sooner or later, it will be impossible to download good free content. For the older music, it is still possible to find uncorrupted versions for download. However to find the new stuff is frustrating to say the least. All I know is that I have gone back to actually buying CD's. Imagine that...:(
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
PHNINE said:
However to find the new stuff is frustrating to say the least. All I know is that I have gone back to actually buying CD's. Imagine that...:(
All the new stuff is on either torrent sites or newsgroups.
In many cases it's there before it's released for sale to the public.
Just have to know where to look.
 

hungry

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2005
1,528
82
48
another one to try is shareaza, it is free and I think superior to limewire and kazaa
 

PHNINE

Banned
Aug 27, 2005
5,462
0
0
Penthouse
WoodPeckr said:
All the new stuff is on either torrent sites or newsgroups.
In many cases it's there before it's released for sale to the public.
Just have to know where to look.
I know where to get the new stuff if I pay for it, but the new free stuff is very frustrating because of all the fakes and crap you end up downloading.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
243
63
Well so far soulseek has been good....... high bit rates, no corrupt files, great range from dnb djs to christina aguilera to sade to tupac to cafe del mar.....
 

DATYdude

Puttin' in Face Time
Oct 8, 2003
3,762
0
36
DON'T STEAL MUSIC FROM ARTISTS

(OK I will make a "Robin Hood" exception for artists who are stinking rich and no longer creative: Paul McCartney, Madonna, Stones... But anyone who is still earning their living on creating music, including the record companies who are giving the artists contracts -- fat as they may seem -- should be compensated. Don't like it? Don't listen!)
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
243
63
You're right it is theft. I admit that I do buy some CDs still but even then most of the CDs I buy are used meaning the artist never sees a penny of my purchase...... or when it comes to vinyl it's all about record shows...... so in the end how much does the artist recieve thanks to me?
 

MarkII

New member
Sep 22, 2004
1,904
0
0
I admit that I do buy some CDs still but even then most of the CDs I buy are used meaning the artist never sees a penny of my purchase
Frank...if it was released on a CD then the artist was paid and is entitled to royalites...excluding garage bands who put out a no name CD.

Look at it this way, the Toronto Star still sells copies of the day Armstrong touched his foot on the moon. They own it..yep it's an oldie..but THEY own it. And, they are entitled to copyright.

Assuming that the Stones..the next tour will be called "chapped lips" btw...McCartny and other's is simply wrong. They made the money because they were THAT good. To at some point turn and arbitrarily say well that's enough? Sorry, if it was your song you'd be screaming for every penny due to you and so would I.

The true fault lies with the record companies themselves. We have a very good friend who has worked as a record company marketing person and as a Marketing Director for many many years.

A number of years ago..(lets say about 9) we were having dinner and my SO asked her about MP3's? Her response..it came up in a meeting and the parent company in the US feels it's no big thing. Really? Hmmmm?

That was the response. Honest to god..what we knew as a gold mine the record companies saw as no big thing, it will be outlawed quickly, end of story. How fucking wrong could that have been? The worst part was they told their own staff to ignore it. This is not a fly by night label. At the time just BMG..now SonyBMG.

I feel bad for the artisits because the companies never protected their rights from day one.

M2
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
243
63
I agree with what you are saying but you did not read what I said correctly. I buy most of my CDs at USED cd stores. So when I pay for a CD that money goes to the owner of the store. So it doesn't matter if 1 or 10 people have paid for one copy of a CD the record company and artist only get paid once.

Yes the original sale of the CD resulted in royalties but subsequent changes of ownership do not benefit the artist.

I admit it's a rationalization but my point is that either way the artist doesn't see my money (except for concerts) since they don't profit from sale of used CDs or MP3.

Change the system and I'll go back to paying. I have plenty of CDs and I am about to begin a vinyl collection.
 

MarkII

New member
Sep 22, 2004
1,904
0
0
Frank...my bad..I missed that. Sorry.

I also hate people who say MY Bad...and I did it!

M2
 

Papi Chulo

Banned Permanently
Jan 30, 2006
2,556
0
0
SpaClient said:
You can adjust the mp3 encoding method if you want. It's cheap, decent selection and it's legal. Just take your time getting familiar with the download process.

Besides MP3,s, you can download Ipod compatible files and encode the music up to 320kb/s... for a little more money!

On average it is about 20 cents per song. (192kb/s)
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts