Open letter to Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, Part 2

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,940
2,962
113
He does have a point!

If you missed part 1, you can find it here: http://www.torontosun.com/2016/02/28/open-letter-from-kevin-oleary-to-kathleen-wynne

Hi Premier Wynne,

I'm worried.

I asked you to keep me informed about the $1.9 billion you are extracting out of the Ontario economy in new carbon taxes. I was excited when you promised lots of new jobs and reductions in carbon emissions. Then I saw the July jobs report. Wow, 36,100 Ontario jobs lost in a single month, the worst decline since the recession, and you still haven't told me any good news about carbon emission reductions. I guess your new plan is not working.

Maybe it would have been better to leave that $1.9 billion in the hands of the Ontario businesses that were using it to hire employees before you taxed it away from them.

However, I hear it's not all bad news on the Ontario job front. While the private sector is losing jobs by the tens of thousands under your new tax policies, you have been busy creating some really interesting opportunities for your staff. I don't know how I missed this, but apparently you lost $70 million setting up and then cancelling the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) in June. While in operation only six months, you hired some really special people that walked away with millions of taxpayers' dollars for apparently doing nothing. It sounds so ridiculous that I am assuming I must have it wrong, and that's why I'm putting pen to paper.

So here goes, true or false?

•Did you spend $8 million marketing the ORPP even though it didn't exist? That sounds so crazy it can't be true.

•Did you give Neala Barton, the plan's senior vice-president of communications, $316,819? She started in March. Just exactly what was she communicating for 90 days?

•Did you pay Anne Slivinskas -- the pension plan's general counsel -- $341,418 for working there just three weeks? That's $2,845.15/hr. You don't fool around with taxpayers' money; You hire the best lawyers!

•Did you pay a tech guy named Brian Gill -- the pensions plan's CTO -- $414,050 to work for two months! (Note to self: Send Premier Wynne my comp committee's North American average salary report. Her laptop must have been hacked.)

•Jennifer Brown -- your choice for senior vice-president of the plan's operations -- was a lifer. She started March 21 and lasted until the end of June. So, with that kind of long-term commitment, no one should complain about the $445,019 you gave her.

•Did you really pay ORPP CEO Mary Anne Palangio $465,938 for 90 days' work? Who says you can't get a great job in Ontario.

•This one is my favourite, it's so out there! Did you give $485,000 to Saad Rafi when his job running the Pan Am Games ended and then hire him again to run the ORPP even though he has never had an investment mandate before? And then did you pay him an additional $827,925 to walk away a few months later? If this is true, I bet some taxpayers are unhappy about it.

Maybe it would help if you spin this as an inspirational story. You search the province for a seasoned financial money manager to be the fiduciary of the new ORRP but in the last minute hire someone who has fallen on hard times and is out of work, even though they never managed money before. It's so Rocky-esque!

Rafi could have been great as a pension plan manager but we will never know. Giving him the $827Gs for taking this bold new step in his career is the least we taxpayers can do. After all, it's hard to live off a measly $485,000 severance when taxes are so high in Ontario, but I know you are not spending any time worrying about that.

These must be very special people! No one in the private sector could ever get a deal like this: Thank goodness they know you. Some Ontarians might see this and assume you don't give a damn about their hard-earned money. Is that true? Frankly, if I gave away $2.8 million to employees that did nothing in my businesses, I would go bankrupt. Come to think of it, your government has a long history of starting projects, spending millions and then cancelling them -- you know, like gas plants, "green" projects and now pension plans. That's why Ontario is $308 billion in debt, so you are kind of bankrupting us, in your own special way.

Still I get it, perhaps from your point of view, why should anybody give a damn about the $70 million you just wasted, it's just a rounding error.

Well, maybe the voters do. Have you seen the latest polls? Perhaps at this point in your mandate you may want to think about delivering a little more transparency and performance instead of dreaming up new ways to tax people and businesses and then spending it this way.

I'm just trying to help.

Anyway, I don't want to be negative so I hope you are having a great summer. I know the 36,100 people in Ontario who just lost their jobs in July are feeling a little down but I'm sure they will go from sad to glad when you tell them about all the carbon emissions you have reduced. Best you get that good news out soon. In the meantime, next time you are paying people on your staff to do nothing for $827,000, maybe you could show a little compassion and hire one of your 36,100 constituents who just lost their job.

There will be an election soon and when that's over and you start your new career, I'm going to bet it won't be one where you manage money.

Yours respectfully,

Kevin O'Leary

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/kevin-oleary/open-letter-to-ontario-pr_b_11759978.html
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,761
524
113
It baffles me when stuff like this is publicized, Liberal supporters will still say Wynne is doing a good job.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
It baffles me when stuff like this is publicized, Liberal supporters will still say Wynne is doing a good job.
AND, say that Hair Doo is really popular.

FAST
 

dirkd101

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2005
10,409
210
63
eastern frontier
Kevin O'Leary is the greatest!

It's great to hear that our lady Premier is being fiscally responsible. I can't wait to pay more for my burnable carbon products, I'm sure the money gathered will take a big bite out of carbon emissions and the air I breathe will taste much sweeter because of this tax. Thanks M'Lady.
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
Kevin O'Leary is the greatest!

It's great to hear that our lady Premier is being fiscally responsible. I can't wait to pay more for my burnable carbon products, I'm sure the money gathered will take a big bite out of carbon emissions and the air I breathe will taste much sweeter because of this tax. Thanks M'Lady.
Kathleen Wynne's talk about saving the planet closely resembles what Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker used to say about saving our souls.

It's funny how the only road to salvation always seems to involve giving our so-called saviours more money.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It baffles me when stuff like this is publicized, Liberal supporters will still say Wynne is doing a good job.
Absolutely. If she hadn't been serious about creating the ORPP, Ottawa never would have. It was money well spent.

You can't go to the bargaining table claiming to be going your own way, without actually going your own way.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,761
524
113
Absolutely. If she hadn't been serious about creating the ORPP, Ottawa never would have. It was money well spent.

You can't go to the bargaining table claiming to be going your own way, without actually going your own way.
Then we'll send you the bill for $70 million.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
There is no need to increase the CPP. Overall Canadian retirees are doing just fine.
CPP is only being increased for people who are contributing to it today. CPP increase will reduce the taxes we wind up paying to fund GIS by having more people retire with enough pension, paid for by their own earnings rather than other people's money.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
CPP is only being increased for people who are contributing to it today. CPP increase will reduce the taxes we wind up paying to fund GIS by having more people retire with enough pension, paid for by their own earnings rather than other people's money.
Once again,...will change NOTHING.

People will just retire with more dept, the end result will be the same.

You can't change attitude by throwing money at it, contrary the incompetent Fiberals version of reality.

FAST
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,761
524
113
CPP is only being increased for people who are contributing to it today. CPP increase will reduce the taxes we wind up paying to fund GIS by having more people retire with enough pension, paid for by their own earnings rather than other people's money.
Incorrect, all employers will have their contributions increased as well, that in itself is not good news for small and medium businesses, and any sized business that is struggling to stay afloat.
 

guelph

Active member
May 25, 2002
1,500
0
36
77
Incorrect, all employers will have their contributions increased as well, that in itself is not good news for small and medium businesses, and any sized business that is struggling to stay afloat.
The sky is falling, the sky is falling

I have heard this on every type of change tax, technology, safety policies, employment policies. You name it and response is the same
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
40,440
7,716
113
I agree she's a dingbat and needs to go, but Kevin O'Leary is being disingenuous.

Since he is part of the Nassau clique it renders his open letter moot. New tax laws to bring bring tax shelters to account are extremely lenient and the middle class continues to shrink. DIDN'T ANY OF YOU DUMBFUCKS LEARN ANYTHING FROM THE PANAMA FILES. And due to low interest rates, Canadians are now debt junkies and the banks make out like thieves on the interest and service charges. The number of seniors in debt going into retirement is skyrocketing, then they get sucked in by insidious CHIP programs and lose the value of their estates.

Cap and Trade schemes are financially disastrous and environmentally impotent, I agree on that. But for the rest we have to start looking in the mirror.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Incorrect, all employers will have their contributions increased as well, that in itself is not good news for small and medium businesses, and any sized business that is struggling to stay afloat.
Employer contributions are effectively part of your wages. It's just an accounting trick claiming it is employer's money. It's money they spend hiring an employee.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,849
8,631
113
Room 112
CPP is only being increased for people who are contributing to it today. CPP increase will reduce the taxes we wind up paying to fund GIS by having more people retire with enough pension, paid for by their own earnings rather than other people's money.
The increase to CPP will surely be in excess of the tax savings from less funds being paid out as a guaranteed income supplement. Personally I think the GIS is a flawed calculation because it does not take into account the recipient's net worth, even excluding the value of their personal residence.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts