One last time: PLAME WAS COVERT

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak
Newly released unclassified document details CIA employment
By Joel Seidman
Producer
NBC News
Updated: 4:24 p.m. ET May 29, 2007


WASHINGTON - An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003.

The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation.

The nature of Plame's CIA employment never came up in Libby's perjury and obstruction of justice trial.

Undercover travel

The unclassified summary of Plame's employment with the CIA at the time that syndicated columnist Robert Novak published her name on July 14, 2003 says, "Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for who the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States."


Plame worked as an operations officer in the Directorate of Operations and was assigned to the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) in January 2002 at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

The employment history indicates that while she was assigned to CPD, Plame, "engaged in temporary duty travel overseas on official business." The report says, "she traveled at least seven times to more than ten times." When overseas Plame traveled undercover, "sometimes in true name and sometimes in alias -- but always using cover -- whether official or non-official (NOC) -- with no ostensible relationship to the CIA."

Criminal prosecution beat national security
After the Novak column was published and Plame's identity was widely reported in the media, and according to the document, "the CIA lifted Ms Wilson's cover" and then "rolled back her cover" effective to the date of the leak.

The CIA determined, "that the public interest in allowing the criminal prosecution to proceed outweighed the damage to national security that might reasonably be expected from the official disclosure of Ms. Wilson's employment and cover status."

The CIA has not divulged any other details of the nature of Plame's cover or the methods employed by the CIA to protect her cover nor the details of her classified intelligence activities. Plame resigned from the CIA in December 2005.

Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson have filed a lawsuit against four current or former top Bush administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, accusing them and other White House officials of conspiring to destroy her career at the CIA.

'I felt like I had been hit in the gut'
In March at a House of Representatives hearing, Plame testified saying, "My name and identity were carelessly and recklessly abused by senior government officials in both the White house and the State Department"

She described how it felt to see her true identity exposed in the morning paper, her career destroyed she said.

"I felt like I had been hit in the gut, it was over in an instant, I immediately thought of my family's safety."

Plame's identity was leaked to reporters in 2003, after her husband began criticizing the Bush administration. She claims her constitutional rights were violated by the administration and is demanding compensation.

No leak charges
Several administration officials, including Libby, former State Department official Richard Armitage and Bush advisor Karl Rove, disclosed Plame's identity to reporters.

No one was ever charged with the leak of Plame's name itself, which would have been a crime only if someone knowingly gave our information about someone covered by a specific law protecting the identities of covert agents.

Fitzgerald wrote last week in the 18-page memo, "Particularly in a case such as this, where Mr. Libby was a high-ranking government official whose falsehoods were central to issues in a significant criminal investigation, it is important that this court impose a sentence that accurately reflects the value the judicial system places on truth-telling in criminal investigations."

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."

Libby was convicted in March of four of five felony counts against him. He is scheduled to be sentenced on June 5th before U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,732
105
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
LOL

Still banging that pot.

OTB
 

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
Now BOT, you have asked why Fitz didn't indict.

Here's the WaPo's Froomkin on that and Fitz' filing last week.

Fitzgerald Again Points to Cheney
By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, May 29, 2007; 1:22 PM


Special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald has made it clearer than ever that he was hot on the trail of a coordinated campaign to out CIA agent Valerie Plame until that line of investigation was cut off by the repeated lies from Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Libby was convicted in February of perjury and obstruction of justice. Fitzgerald filed a memo on Friday asking U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton, who will sentence Libby next week, to put him in prison for at least two and a half years.

Despite all the public interest in the case, Fitzgerald has repeatedly asserted that grand-jury secrecy rules prohibit him from being more forthcoming about either the course of his investigation or any findings beyond those he disclosed to make the case against Libby. But when his motives have been attacked during court proceedings, Fitzgerald has occasionally shown flashes of anger -- and has hinted that he and his investigative team suspected more malfeasance at higher levels of government than they were able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

In Friday's eminently readable court filing, Fitzgerald quotes the Libby defense calling his prosecution "unwarranted, unjust, and motivated by politics." In responding to that charge, the special counsel evidently felt obliged to put Libby's crime in context. And that context is Dick Cheney.

Libby's lies, Fitzgerald wrote, "made impossible an accurate evaluation of the role that Mr. Libby and those with whom he worked played in the disclosure of information regarding Ms. Wilson's CIA employment and about the motivations for their actions."

It was established at trial that it was Cheney himself who first told Libby about Plame's identity as a CIA agent, in the course of complaining about criticisms of the administration's run-up to war leveled by her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson. And, as Fitzgerald notes: "The evidence at trial further established that when the investigation began, Mr. Libby kept the Vice President apprised of his shifting accounts of how he claimed to have learned about Ms. Wilson's CIA employment."

The investigation, Fitzgerald writes, "was necessary to determine whether there was concerted action by any combination of the officials known to have disclosed the information about Ms. Plame to the media as anonymous sources, and also whether any of those who were involved acted at the direction of others. This was particularly important in light of Mr. Libby's statement to the FBI that he may have discussed Ms. Wilson's employment with reporters at the specific direction of the Vice President." (My italics.)

Not clear on the concept yet? Fitzgerald adds: "To accept the argument that Mr. Libby's prosecution is the inappropriate product of an investigation that should have been closed at an early stage, one must accept the proposition that the investigation should have been closed after at least three high-ranking government officials were identified as having disclosed to reporters classified information about covert agent Valerie Wilson, where the account of one of them was directly contradicted by other witnesses, where there was reason to believe that some of the relevant activity may have been coordinated, and where there was an indication from Mr. Libby himself that his disclosures to the press may have been personally sanctioned by the Vice President."


Up until now, Fitzgerald's most singeing attack on Cheney came during closing arguments at the Libby trial in February. Libby's lawyers had complained that Fitzgerald was trying to put a "cloud" over Cheney without evidence to back it up -- and that set Fitzgerald off. As I wrote in my Feb. 21 column, the special counsel responded with fire: "There is a cloud over what the Vice President did that week. . . . He had those meetings. He sent Libby off to [meet then-New York Times reporter] Judith Miller at the St. Regis Hotel. At that meeting, the two-hour meeting, the defendant talked about the wife. We didn't put that cloud there. That cloud remains because the defendant has obstructed justice and lied about what happened. . . .

"That's not something that we put there. That cloud is something that we just can't pretend isn't there."

To those of us watching the investigation and trial unfold, Cheney's presence behind the scenes has emerged in glimpses and hints. (The defense's decision not to call Cheney to the stand remains a massive bummer.) But I suspect that people looking back on this story will see it with greater clarity: As a blatant -- and thus far successful -- cover-up for the vice president.
You got that, BOT?

Fitz, who is eminently more careful and circumspect than Ken Starr ever was, decided he could not push ahead to indict because of the lies and obstruction of justice by Libby -- who was covering up for Cheney.

LOL yourself, asshat.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,732
105
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
TOVisitor said:
Now BOT, you have asked why Fitz didn't indict.

Here's the WaPo's Froomkin on that and Fitz' filing last week.



You got that, BOT?

Fitz, who is eminently more careful and circumspect than Ken Starr ever was, decided he could not push ahead to indict because of the lies and obstruction of justice by Libby -- who was covering up for Cheney.

LOL yourself, asshat.
How many millions for ONE perjury indictment.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,779
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
How many millions for ONE perjury indictment.

OTB
bot now you sound like one of the biggest jackasses on this board.
You were the one defending Ken Starr's witchunt over Bill's blowjob that ran up a tab of over $80 million but that was OK! You're stooges can waste $80 million and it's all fine and dandy!
....and now you carp about wasting, "How many millions for ONE perjury indictment."
Plame's case is a bit more serious than a 'hummer'.
Plame's case deals with treason. Guess your calcified little brain missed that point!

You're starting to sound lately, more and more like your daddy, JAJA!.....:D
 

frasier

Insert comments here!!
Jul 19, 2006
3,377
0
0
In your head
WoodPeckr said:
bot now you sound like one of the biggest jackasses on this board.
You were the one defending Ken Starr's witchunt over Bill's blowjob that ran up a tab of over $80 million but that was OK! You're stooges can waste $80 million and it's all fine and dandy!
....and now you carp about wasting, "How many millions for ONE perjury indictment."
Plame's case is a bit more serious than a 'hummer'.
Plame's case deals with treason. Guess your calcified little brain missed that point!

You're starting to sound lately, more and more like your daddy, JAJA!.....:D
If you would be just 50% right, you really belief that Fitzgerald would have stopped? The moveon.org and Daily Kos machine would have fueled the machine, but even they couldn't find anymore.
The case is closed..stick with the facts, the rest is hogwash and wishful thinking...since when do blogs constitute news?
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,779
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
frasier said:
...since when do blogs constitute news?
That's like saying, since when does Faux News, constitute news?.....:rolleyes:
 

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
frasier said:
If you would be just 50% right, you really belief that Fitzgerald would have stopped? The moveon.org and Daily Kos machine would have fueled the machine, but even they couldn't find anymore.
The case is closed..stick with the facts, the rest is hogwash and wishful thinking...since when do blogs constitute news?
Now do tell, frasier. What machine would that be?

Are you implying that Fitzgerald was taking his marching orders from moveon? Cuz if you are, that is a fantasy of the right wing that I have never heard anyone articulate before.

Stick with the facts? Yes, stick with the facts frasier.

Libby lied before a Grand Jury of the US Federal Court. He obstructed justice. He purjured himself. He helped to out a covert agent of the CIA.

THOSE are the facts.

And what blogs are you talking about?

Both of those articles appeared in respectable news sources -- not Breitbart -- and refer to a filing last week in Federal Court by Prosecutor Fitzgerald.

Or are you on one of your "Well, I didn't read any of the posts so far in this thread, but I will comment anyway" jags?
 

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
onthebottom said:
How many millions for ONE perjury indictment.

OTB
That's really, really hilarious, BOT. You, who are posting almost daily about the peccadilloes of a Clinton's blowjob, show no shame whatsoever in asking how many millions were spent on the Plame investigation.

There are memorials in Langley to agents who were assassinated as a result of Plame's outing.

The right wing in action. Trivializing death. Again.
 

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
More from Fitz' filing last week (h/t Byron York):

“The reasons why Mr. Libby was not charged with an offense directly relating to his unauthorized disclosures of classified information regarding Ms. Wilson,” Fitzgerald writes, “included, but were not limited to, the fact that Mr. Libby’s false testimony obscured a confident determination of what in fact occurred, particularly where the accounts of the reporters with whom Mr. Libby spoke (and their notes) did not include any explicit evidence specifically proving that Mr. Libby knew that Ms. Wilson was a covert agent.
I will translate for the mentally challenged upthread:

Fitz didn't indict because Libby was obstructing the investigation by lying. Fitz knew that to indict Cheney or Rove, he would have to have them dead to rights.

Contrast that with Ken Starr.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,732
105
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
You promise it's the last time, somehow I think not.

OTB
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,530
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
WOW


TOV says she was covert so she must have been one of the voices in its head. :eek:
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
papasmerf said:
WOW


TOV says she was covert so she must have been one of the voices in its head. :eek:
Although I agree with Woody, TOV is such a condescending little SOB it's difficult to side with him.

Do you get the feeling in high school, TOV ruled the roost at the chess club?
 

TOVisitor

New member
Jul 14, 2003
3,317
0
0
onthebottom said:
You promise it's the last time, somehow I think not.

OTB
When you stop cutting and pasting from the Amanda Carpenters of the world, who deny that Plame was covert, I will stop posting about Plame.

This is typical right wing behavior: believe the rantings of Amanda Carpenter over evidence shown in open court by a Federal Prosecutor to a jury of 12 citizens.

When the facts don't fit the situation, just change the facts.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,732
105
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
lookingforitallthetime said:
Although I agree with Woody, TOV is such a condescending little SOB it's difficult to side with him.

Do you get the feeling in high school, TOV ruled the roost at the chess club?
I don't think TOV has ever ruled the roost, no matter how modest and there in lies the problem.

OTB
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
onthebottom said:
I don't think TOV has ever ruled the roost, no matter how modest and there in lies the problem.

OTB
I don't know......the chess club gang can be quite malleable.

.............so I've heard.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,732
105
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
lookingforitallthetime said:
I don't know......the chess club gang can be quite malleable.

.............so I've heard.
Perhaps AV.....
 

frasier

Insert comments here!!
Jul 19, 2006
3,377
0
0
In your head
TOVisitor said:
Now do tell, frasier. What machine would that be?

Are you implying that Fitzgerald was taking his marching orders from moveon? Cuz if you are, that is a fantasy of the right wing that I have never heard anyone articulate before.

Stick with the facts? Yes, stick with the facts frasier.

Libby lied before a Grand Jury of the US Federal Court. He obstructed justice. He purjured himself. He helped to out a covert agent of the CIA.

THOSE are the facts.

And what blogs are you talking about?

Both of those articles appeared in respectable news sources -- not Breitbart -- and refer to a filing last week in Federal Court by Prosecutor Fitzgerald.

Or are you on one of your "Well, I didn't read any of the posts so far in this thread, but I will comment anyway" jags?
The very same machine that currently hijacks the Democratic party...MOVEON.ORG and the Daily Kos..and has guys like you and Woody furthering their cause.
The Democratic Party has turned in to something that would make Truman turn in his grave..the D's have been hijacked by the socialist left and Hillary is their spokes person....
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,779
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
frasier said:
The Democratic Party has turned in to something that would make Truman turn in his grave..the D's have been hijacked by the socialist left and Hillary is their spokes person....
You must be hitting Dubya's BLOW BIGTIME!
What about the GOP being highjacked by the war mongering fascists of the GOP far Reich-Wing!!! You know the one's Colin Powell referred to as a bunch of 'Fucking Crazies'!
Ike is probably turning over in his grave along with Lincoln.
At least Colin sees these nutzy neocons for the dangerous fools they are, why don't you? Or do you support these far right GOP neocon fascists?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts