Select Company Escorts

Oh joy, another big farking earthquake in Indonesia...

SophiasPleasures

When Sexy Gets Nasty ;-)
Mar 21, 2004
68
0
0
East!
www.sophiaspleasures.com
That is very sad :( Let's hope this earthquake doesn't create a tsunami like the last 9.0 one did over there....





.
 

great bear

The PUNisher
Apr 11, 2004
16,170
57
48
Nice Dens
Those poor people cannot buy any luck. When shit happens they get torrents of it.
 

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
Does anyone know how many miles radius an 8.5 can do as far as destruction.
I know this is a relative question but I still wanna hear some opinions.

Any geologists in da house???????????
 

Tick

New member
Dec 18, 2002
149
0
0
Latest reports confirm it as an 8.7, it's force was felt 300+ miles from the epicentre and it did signifigant damage to an island off the coast of Sumatra.

The reports of death tolls are anywhere from a few, to dozens, or more. Still, nothing to compare to the last one, which is a good thing.
 

n_v

Banned
Aug 26, 2001
2,006
0
36
Escohort said:
No Tsunami at least.
Tsunami's usually hit within 3 hrs, if none has hit within this time you're safe
So now you're the expert eh? :p
 

Why Not?

Member
Aug 24, 2001
909
1
18
Escohort said:
Does anyone know how many miles radius an 8.5 can do as far as destruction.
I know this is a relative question but I still wanna hear some opinions.

Any geologists in da house???????????
Not that I’m a seismologist but, there are so many factors at play here that it is difficult to say.

Was the earthquake shallow or deep in the crust?
Was the movement horizontal or vertical?
Was it under water or on land?
What type of seismic waves were mostly generated by the quake? Surface waves (l & r) or body waves (p & s)?
See: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/image_glossary/bodywave.html
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/image_glossary/surface_wave.html
What ratio of p-waves (compressional), s-waves (shear), r-waves (rayleigh) and l-waves (love) reached you?
What are the ground conditions in the area where the damage may occur (i.e. is the building built on rock, consolidated soil or porous and saturated river bed sediments?)
Is the building to be damaged located near the ocean where it can be hit with a Tsunami? (They can travel 1,000’s of km.)
Is there a large land mass between you and the Tsunami-generating earthquake?

Having said all this, a Richter 8.7 earthquake is a very, very big quake. It is currently ranked as the 7th largest quake ever recorded.
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/10maps_world.html

Sorry if this was a bit too technical but you asked for it.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Fascinating show on PBS last night about the 1883 eruption of Krakatoa off the southern end of Sumatra (not far from the recent earthquakes). The immensity of the blast was absolutely staggering.

When the volcano, effectively three volcanos grouped together, finally blew itself apart, it released a force equivalent to 200 megatons of TNT. A one megaton blast would be roughly the same as 78 Hiroshima bombs.

The tsunami created was nearly 40m high.

The final blast was heard over 1/12th of the world's surface, and the shock wave generated in the air, circled the earth 7 times.

Weather was affected across the globe for over three years, sunsets turning blood red at night as far away as Europe.

The eruption ripped the island apart, though the volcanic dome has been rebuilding since 1927. Currently Anak Krakatoa (Son of Krakatoa) is approaching the same size as the volcano was in 1883.
 
Last edited:

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
They say that if an asteroid ever hit earth it would simultaneously trigger many volcanoes around the world to blow. Thereby creating enough smoke to cover the entire earth with volcanic dust for a few months.
(and blocking out sunlight)
 

Why Not?

Member
Aug 24, 2001
909
1
18
Escohort said:
How did the volcano create a tsunami?????
Was it from the lava hitting the water??????
fridrikk said:
Lave domes which were underneath the vocanoes blew up generating immense shock waves which in turn generated tidal waves. Java was less than 26 miles from the island and took the full brunt of of waves.
Asterix said:
Caused when the volcano collasped in on itself. Fortunately, because the wave was generated from a "point source", the tsunami was somewhat localized.

http://www.drgeorgepc.com/Tsunami1883Krakatoa.html
I am suspicious of a single source explanation for the explosive forces and the Tsunamis. From the reading that I have done over the last couple of years there was more than one tsunami wave from several explosions and I have seen several explanations of what caused them.

The type of lava that comes out of a Krakatoa type volcano is both viscous and rich in dissolved gases (as opposed to the liquid runny types of lava in Hawaii). As the lavas near surface these gases come out of the lava like a warm shaken beer which is uncapped. The high viscosities of the lava can temporarily plug the volcano giving the opportunity for the build up of gas and resulting huge explosions.

The last of these explosions at Krakatoa completely obliterated the island. This explosion alone would have caused a wave but the blowing apart of the island and partial emptying and collapse of the magma chamber under it would have allowed a huge amount of sea water to rush in. The inrush of water would also create a wave. Then that water would be exposed to a very large amount of molten rock. It would flash to steam and create a huge steam explosion. The instantaneous conversion of say 1 cubic kilometre of sea water to steam would create an explosion which could easily rival any nuclear weapon.

So it is possible that all of these affects contributed to the explosions and tsunamis with earlier explosions being mostly the lava and later ones a mixture. The PBS program seemed to debunk the potential for a steam explosion because of the coarse size of the pumice fragents exposed in a rock outcrop of the debris left behind after the explosion (steam explosions create fine pumice). However, I noted that only the bottom metre of about 20 m of rock was coarse and there were known to be several explosions. This observation fits with the summary of other peoples speculations above. Several people believe that that at least some of the later explosions were steam related.
 

Why Not?

Member
Aug 24, 2001
909
1
18
Escohort said:
They say that if an asteroid ever hit earth it would simultaneously trigger many volcanoes around the world to blow. Thereby creating enough smoke to cover the entire earth with volcanic dust for a few months.
(and blocking out sunlight)
I would think that if the earth were hit by a decent sized asteroid any volcanos that were triggered would be the least of our problems. The vapourized asteroid and resulting fires on a continental scale would be the biggest problem.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts