Royal Spa

NON Super Bowl Teams

spankingman

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2008
3,648
323
83
Teams who HAVE NOT played in the big one to date.

DETROIT Will they ever?

CLEVELAND

HOUSTON

JACKSONVILLE

NEW ORLEANS
Up until Sunday afternoon I would have included Chicago-St. Louis-Arizona Cardinals.
 
Last edited:

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
Hurricane Hank said:
Are you too young to remember "The Fridge" and "The Greatest Show On Turf?"
Its possible you were just saying that jokingly but if you werent I think
when Spankingman said Chicago and St.Louis, I believe he was referring to the Cardinals franchise, not the Bears and Rams.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
spankingman said:
Teams who HAVE NOT played in the big one to date.

DETROIT Will they ever?

CLEVELAND

HOUSTON

JACKSONVILLE

NEW ORLEANS
Up until Sunday afternoon I would have included Chicago-St. Louis-Arizona Cardinals.
Interesting, this was actually a topic of discussion on NFL Total Access on NFL NEtwork today. Jim Mora said he thinks of these teams New Orleans will win the SB first because they have a great offense they have a good coach and they just need to fix up the defense. TD said he thinks Houston because they have the QB, WR, RB, they have some pieces on defense and they have a bright future.
 

spankingman

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2008
3,648
323
83
Non

Right you are!!!! The Cardinals "started" in CHICAGO moved to St.LOUIS then ARIZONA.
 
Jacksonville was expected to do well this year but injuries really hampered them. Cleveland has some talent...but was soooooooo poorly coached...who knows what they can do. The saints were an enigma this year...you just never knew which team would show up. They have been a slight disappointment since losing to the Bears in the NFC Championship game 2 years ago. As far as Houston and the lions are concerned...woefully inept is all that can be said. Will they ever...well...who can say...did ANYONE...ANYONE...have the cards picked to go to the Super Bowl this year???
 

popsiclepete

New member
Aug 17, 2003
361
0
0
spankingman said:
Teams who HAVE NOT played in the big one to date.

DETROIT Will they ever?

CLEVELAND

HOUSTON

JACKSONVILLE

NEW ORLEANS
Up until Sunday afternoon I would have included Chicago-St. Louis-Arizona Cardinals.
Thanks for bringing up the Browns not playing in the Super Bowl.

I was in the 7th grade watching "the drive" versus the Broncos.

I hope Elway burns in hell!
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
notanerd said:
Jacksonville was expected to do well this year but injuries really hampered them. Cleveland has some talent...but was soooooooo poorly coached...who knows what they can do. The saints were an enigma this year...you just never knew which team would show up. They have been a slight disappointment since losing to the Bears in the NFC Championship game 2 years ago. As far as Houston and the lions are concerned...woefully inept is all that can be said. Will they ever...well...who can say...did ANYONE...ANYONE...have the cards picked to go to the Super Bowl this year???
Houston in the 2nd half of the season was a very good team. In fact I expect them to be a good team next season and surprise a lot of people. The problem for the TExans this year were turnovers from the QB position and Matt Schaub not being able to stay on the field consistently due to injuries. I watched several Texans games and they have a very good RB in Slaton, a premier WR in Johnson , a good QB in Schaub. They have some players on defense with Mario Williams, Amobi Okoye, Demeco Ryans, etc.
IF they can limit the turnovers from the QB position and be healthy at the QB postition they have a much higher win total than they had last season.

As for CLE, they do have some talent but their problems have been on offense -dropped passes, on defense they had zero pass-rush this season. They were getting no pressure on QBs at all.

The Saints are loaded in talent offensively but defensively the secondary is weak and they did suffer some injuries in the defensive backfield as well , most notably to Mike McKenzie and Tracy Porter. Up front the need a pass-rushing end.

AS for Jacksonville the injuries to the O-line killed them this year, they couldnt run the ball effectively and they couldnt pass-protect for Garrard which led to more turnovers from the QB position than they had last year.
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,231
0
36
GTA
spankingman said:
Right you are!!!! The Cardinals "started" in CHICAGO moved to St.LOUIS then ARIZONA.
I did not realize that... were they called the Chicago Cardinals??
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,231
0
36
GTA
popsiclepete said:
Thanks for bringing up the Browns not playing in the Super Bowl.

I was in the 7th grade watching "the drive" versus the Broncos.

I hope Elway burns in hell!
LOL... me too... I am not a huge Browns fan, but I really liked those Browns teams, and Kosar was great...
 

bigdik

as in " you are such a "
Feb 16, 2003
1,461
0
36
Wherever I shouldn't be
slowandeasy said:
I did not realize that... were they called the Chicago Cardinals??
Morgan Athletic Club
Normals
Racine Cardinals
Chicago Cardinals
St. Louis Cardinals
Phoenix Cardinals
Arizona Cardinals

And by many of their fans over the years, those fucking Cardinals;)
 

homonger

I'm not really back
Oct 27, 2001
5,187
0
0
popsiclepete said:
Thanks for bringing up the Browns not playing in the Super Bowl.

I was in the 7th grade watching "the drive" versus the Broncos.

I hope Elway burns in hell!
Technically, the original Browns franchise has played in a Super Bowl, but as the Baltimore Ravens. I know all Browns fans disavow any association with that team, but in terms of teams never playing in a SB, it is the expansion team Cleveland Browns that we're talking about.
 

Captain Fantastic

...Winning
Jun 28, 2008
3,273
0
36
homonger said:
Technically, the original Browns franchise has played in a Super Bowl, but as the Baltimore Ravens. I know all Browns fans disavow any association with that team, but in terms of teams never playing in a SB, it is the expansion team Cleveland Browns that we're talking about.
Fact Nazi! :cool:
 

Philander13

Member
Jul 13, 2005
52
0
6
popsiclepete said:
Thanks for bringing up the Browns not playing in the Super Bowl.

I was in the 7th grade watching "the drive" versus the Broncos.

I hope Elway burns in hell!
Yes, I remember that game and the other AFC championship game where Ernst Byner fumbled on the one yard line ... God, it's hard being a Browns fan !!

The only comforting thing was the Elway and the Broncos got throughly trounced in the Superbowl in both those years. The Browns may not have been able to beat the Giants or Redskins but at least there would have been better games where it wouldn't be till the fourth quarter till the winner was decided.
 

bigdik

as in " you are such a "
Feb 16, 2003
1,461
0
36
Wherever I shouldn't be
Philander13 said:
Yes, I remember that game and the other AFC championship game where Ernst Byner fumbled on the one yard line ... God, it's hard being a Browns fan !!

The only comforting thing was the Elway and the Broncos got throughly trounced in the Superbowl in both those years. The Browns may not have been able to beat the Giants or Redskins but at least there would have been better games where it wouldn't be till the fourth quarter till the winner was decided.
Ok, the Redskins? Sure
No one was going to beat that particular Giants team.
No one.
The AFC team that stacked up best at the end of the regular season was the Seahawks, and they missed the playoffs.
 

popsiclepete

New member
Aug 17, 2003
361
0
0
homonger said:
Technically, the original Browns franchise has played in a Super Bowl, but as the Baltimore Ravens. I know all Browns fans disavow any association with that team, but in terms of teams never playing in a SB, it is the expansion team Cleveland Browns that we're talking about.

You're right in regards to coming back as an expansion team....

BUT!.....

I believe part of the deal of Modell going to Baltimore was that the franchise would keep its records as Browns records and that whatever the Ravens did would be totally seperate. The franchise would just stay dormant for a few years and pick up as though it never left.

Therefore, the Ravens playing in that game and winning means we have never played in a Super Bowl! (weird to be happy about that but I am)

Hope my spelling is correct Homonger lol
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
popsiclepete said:
You're right in regards to coming back as an expansion team....

BUT!.....

I believe part of the deal of Modell going to Baltimore was that the franchise would keep its records as Browns records and that whatever the Ravens did would be totally seperate. The franchise would just stay dormant for a few years and pick up as though it never left.

Therefore, the Ravens playing in that game and winning means we have never played in a Super Bowl! (weird to be happy about that but I am)

Hope my spelling is correct Homonger lol
Yes, popsiclepete, you are 100% correct, the Baltimore Ravens did not take the Browns records with them to Baltimore. I remember hearing that too many years ago that the records would stay in Cleveland.
 
Toronto Escorts