New Showcase Shows -- Are you watching?

LeatherDoll

More Than U Want Me to Be
Has anybody caught either of the two new Canadian productions on Showcase, Slings and Arrows or Playmakers?

They are both incredibly good.

I am so happy to have some good tv on again. I only have the enhanced cable - up channel 70 or so - but I think it is interesting that I almost never watch anything below 31 - and if I do it is inevitably 27 (W), ctv, cbc, or global (although that, admittedly some of these are Canadian simulcasts of American shows like CSI - cause its so damn sexy - or Chasing Jordan). There is actually, lots of stuff I like (although there is not a single sit-com you could convince me to watch except The Newsroom), which is a nice change from the exclusive litany of idiotic reality shows that we had been plagued with for a while. Now that the writers have figured out that they need to write these super complex ensemble cast character studies in order to keep the actors employed (and thus, themselves) in response, we are really finally seeing what creative talent is actually out there. And with the increase in cable channelling, the money is appearing to allow these shows to develop and be produced.

Showcase remains my favorite - particularly because of the high Canadian content. The new stuff is great, although (and I know I'll get flamed for this - but I wish you wouldn't bother cause I don't want this thread to be hijacked with it) I will never understand how Trailer Park Boys managed to sneak in.

I've just been so impressed with the super high quality of both of these new ones that I thought I'd mention it, in case you haven't checked them out.

Slings and Arrows - with Paul Gross - is based, likely, on Stratford - and deals with an theatre company in a smallish town. Its a "behind the scenes" look at the theatre, but the scripts are so brilliant that they have managed to work in enormous amounts of inredibly good Shakespeare (through rehearsals) and watching the process of a director getting response from the actors is awesome. The characters are wonderful, with the overt premise being the death of the Artistic Director forcing the return of a once brilliant actor who had a breakdown. He is still brilliant, but a little disheveled in his recovery and he is being haunted by the newly dead man, who keeps appearing and giving him moral support and advice. There is a nice mix of interpersonal and "acting" storylines. Really funny. And the writing is outstanding - some of the descriptions of the meaning of works are pure art. If you have any love for the theatre or Shakespeare, you will adore this show. Chances are you will love it even if you don't already have the appreciation - this show will surely create it. (Monday at 10?)

Playmakers, on the other hand, is a super slick presentation of the inner workings of a professional football team. Plenty of familiar faces, and lots of new ones. Enormous cast. Heavy story lines. Film noire naration from different players overlaying their thoughts with their actions. They outed a gay player this season, and the depictions of homophobia were so harsh I really had a hard time watching it. The manipulations of the management are incredible; lots of cover-ups and bullying. Most of these are not nice people. Storylines include personal relationships as well as the struggles of team mates and management. Most of the on field stuff is done in short scenes - usually depicting the outcome of some behind the scenes struggle played out during the game or practice. (Saturday at 10)

Whatever, I know its just tv, but these are so worth catching. Say what you want about the past, but Canadian tv rocks. (And, if you check out the past, about 1/2 of what was done here was always really good - look at Traders or Due South)

Anyone else watching?
 

Goober Mcfly

Retired. -ish
Oct 26, 2001
10,124
11
38
NE
The fact that you don't regard "Trailer Park Boys" as quality TV speaks volumes on your intelligence when it comes to television shows.
 

The Brus

Guest
Nov 30, 2004
166
0
0
Windsor
I think Marj Helgenberger on CSI is the hottest MILF on television. I wonder, if Grissom is such a taskmaster, why he would let Catherine Willows wear low-cut tops and tight pants when working at the CSI lab.
 

LeatherDoll

More Than U Want Me to Be
Goober, you are so damn boring ...

Goober Mcfly said:
The fact that you don't regard "Trailer Park Boys" as quality TV speaks volumes on your intelligence when it comes to television shows.
You know, my opinion of you drops daily. Luckily its a pretty short fall.

What is wrong with you that you must continually resort to name calling over the pettiest of mundane of things? We don't share the same sense of humour, that is no surprise - I'd be horrified if we did, but really - get off it.

I suggest you just put me on your ignore list and move the hell along. You have absolutely no class at all.
 

LeatherDoll

More Than U Want Me to Be
Oh yeah, one more ...

First, I correct the name to Crossing Jordan.

Second, the other Canadian show that is incredibly funny and brilliantly written is CBC's "This is Wonderland". (Tuesday at 9). It takes place at the court house of Old City Hall in Toronto and the cast of insanity is mind-boggling. This one is really a little hard to explain - you just need to see it.
 

Goober Mcfly

Retired. -ish
Oct 26, 2001
10,124
11
38
NE
LeatherDoll said:
You know, my opinion of you drops daily. Luckily its a pretty short fall.

What is wrong with you that you must continually resort to name calling over the pettiest of mundane of things? We don't share the same sense of humour, that is no surprise - I'd be horrified if we did, but really - get off it.

I suggest you just put me on your ignore list and move the hell along. You have absolutely no class at all.
Actually, if you had any reading comprehension skills at all, you'd see that it was a compliment.
 

LeatherDoll

More Than U Want Me to Be
Well, so much for this thread not being hijacked.

Well, it is a standard practice of abusers and oppressors to present themselves such that they can be construed or interpretted in more than one way or with enough double entendre that when confronted they can simply sit back smugly and reply that the offended party has simply misunderstood or it was a joke (and where is your sense of humour?).

Perhaps if your clarification of my "error" in interpretting your response hadn't included further personal insult I might have given it some consideration.

In addition, since I adhere to the substantive approach to analytic reasoning, I must place your actions in context to assist me in my decision as to which of the inferences your ambiguous comment was intended to reflect. I, therefore, based my interpretation not just on the immediate post, but also on the behaviour you are so clearly displaying all over the board, and have done in many other threads in which I have participated where you find it necessary to state your opinion of the people or topic involved in the thread despite your own clear lack of knowledge or interest (which makes one wonder why you bothered reading it except to insert your rude, insulting, and always ad hominim - name calling - comments!)

Ironically, your recently acclaimed sense of freedom and liberation at now being able to post such comments (since you are no longer a moderator) has taken the form of silencing oppression of the freedom of inquiry and expression of others.

I try very hard not engage in negative interplay - not in any context of my life. I want my interactions to be clearly understood, my intentions unambigous, and my position to need no further clarification. If you expect that I am to interpret angry or sacrastic commentary as compliment, particularly in light of your postings and responses elsewhere, you better make it clear. Perhaps you could learn to use the similies? :rolleyes:

I'm not really sure what is going on with you, but it is really hard for me to believe that all the anger and hostility you are displaying is purely fictional and meant to increase the comedic/humour level of the site. I hope if you don't feel better soon that you at least stop feeling the need to stop throwing it at others.

In the meantime, I'm really not interested. I have already violated my own standard (of not rewarding bad behaviour) by responding and giving you the attention you are so clearly craving, but I think my point is clear and I am done.

If you wish to start interacting with me in a respectful and appropriate manner, I might reconsider my opinion.

Sorry.
 
Y

yychobbyist

LD, you gotta stop using calm rational and reasoned argument lasting paragraphs (rather than words) with Goober. He has a hard time focussing.
 

auto doctor

New member
Aug 25, 2004
549
0
0
In a Korn field
www.korn.com
I think LD would make a great Mod...and easily pass for Fang's brother.(My apology Ms LD.)

But thank you for putting Goober's tail between his legs.

Bravo.....
 
Last edited:

soulglue2000

New member
May 19, 2003
4
0
0
Palymakers Canadian?

I do not think Playmakers is a Canadian show. It is produced for ESPN by Orly Adelson Productions which is based out of Los Angeles. it has been shown on ESPN in the U.S. for close to a year now. Iv'e never seen it, but remember it being mocked on sports-talk radio when it first came out.

Hope you can still enjoy the show LeatherDoll
 

Goober Mcfly

Retired. -ish
Oct 26, 2001
10,124
11
38
NE
Oh good Lord.

Well, it is a standard practice of abusers and oppressors to present themselves such that they can be construed or interpretted in more than one way ......
So I'm an abuser and/or an oppressor now?

Perhaps if your clarification of my "error" in interpretting your response hadn't included further personal insult I might have given it some consideration.
I'm sorry, but when presented with such lovely epithets as "get off it", "move the hell along", and "You have absolutely no class at all", I tend to get a bit defensive. You have to give me credit that my "personal insult" to you was very mild, even if your fragile ego construes it as one. Furthermore, my contention with you has always been that you do not actually understand the posts you are reading before attempting to blindside those that you "disagree with" with a haughty, holier-than-thou, seven-dollar word infested diatribe stating your self-righteous views which, by the way, are the only views that anyone half as intelligent and educated as yourself would hold. Anyone who disagrees with you is, by exception then, an idiotic uneducated mouth-breather for whom you do not have so much as the time of day.

In addition, since I adhere to the substantive approach to analytic reasoning, I must place your actions in context to assist me in my decision as to which of the inferences your ambiguous comment was intended to reflect...........
Wow, judge much? As I stated in my last paragraph, the ability to put six syllable words together is no basis for a standard of intelligence. And furthermore, if one disagrees with your eminence, that does not mean that one is bereft of knowledge or interest. This is a discussion board, not a Let's-see-what-LeatherDoll-thinks-so-we-can-all-conform-to-her-superior-intellect board.

Ironically, your recently acclaimed sense of freedom and liberation at now being able to post such comments (since you are no longer a moderator) has taken the form of silencing oppression of the freedom of inquiry and expression of others.
Seeing as you are a researcher, I would like to see proof of where my being a retarded asshat poster has "oppressed the freedom of inquiry and expression of others".

I try very hard not engage in negative interplay - not in any context of my life. ..............
Two things:
1. I am not responsible for what you think nor am I responsible for your perception on reality. That's something you, your id, ego and super-ego need to resolve amongst yourselves.
2. I am not like you. I do not need to be like you, do not need to post like you, do not even need to use proper grammar, yo. I am who I am, and if you have a problem with that I think you might want to check your own self-worth.

I'm not really sure what is going on with you, but it is really hard for me to believe that all the anger and hostility you are displaying is purely fictional and meant to increase the comedic/humour level of the site. I hope if you don't feel better soon that you at least stop feeling the need to stop throwing it at others.
All those who think that my rant yesterday was serious, please say "Aye". All those who obviously are lacking in a sense of humour, and who have just stated that they "must place your actions in context" to figure out my motives, please say some more six syllable words.

In the meantime, I'm really not interested. I have already violated my own standard (of not rewarding bad behaviour) by responding and giving you the attention you are so clearly craving, but I think my point is clear and I am done.
Again, two things:
1. Where do you get off calling my behaviour "bad"
2. It is standard practice of trolls to state wild accusations and to state that they are "done with the conversation" when challenged.

If you wish to start interacting with me in a respectful and appropriate manner, I might reconsider my opinion.
Let's review.

I stated something positive which you took as an attack. Then you spewed this at me:
You know, my opinion of you drops daily. Luckily its a pretty short fall.

What is wrong with you that you must continually resort to name calling over the pettiest of mundane of things? We don't share the same sense of humour, that is no surprise - I'd be horrified if we did, but really - get off it.

I suggest you just put me on your ignore list and move the hell along. You have absolutely no class at all.
...and you are stating that I am not interacting with you in a respectful and appropriate manner?

Wow. You've got big brass ones.

Me too. Sheesh.

*quotes edited for brevity
** no fancy fonts for clarity
 

wrong hole

huh...
May 4, 2003
4,890
0
0
25 malbury lane
I miss 'moderator goober'
 
Y

yychobbyist

Wow, a multi sylabbic, multi-sentence post from Goober. Weird.
 
Toronto Escorts