New Quest girls - gone?

M

Moderator

TERB only accepts reviews of ladies who advertise somewhere.

As Quest is a personals site, it is not considered advertising for escorting etc.
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
Which I find a silly policy.

This should be a discussion board of all that is happening not a biased board of only the few who pay to promote themselves.
 

neotekz

Member
Apr 24, 2006
150
0
16
is this a new policy? we've review many quest girls in the past. if so what's the reason for this?
 
Jul 28, 2006
1,901
2
36
With all due respect to the mods, the chat line and the website are two different things. And more so if you heard the ads on the chatline; you'd hear that the ladies are very much advertising! LOL! Many of them are ladies who advertise here and on other services as well.
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
exactly. To me if we can only discuss ladies who pay to be here and have the ability of getting our posts deleted then this board is very biased.

So to me this policy sounds more like this is one big advertising site to the ladies who pay the mods.

So makes you wonder how reliable the info is.
 

oleman

Member
Apr 15, 2006
301
0
16
My understanding of the moderator is that the board only reviews professionals, who have professional status by adervtising SOMEWHERE. The board does not review amateurs like your ex-gf or any other girl you picked up.
O.
 

ricardo47

Member
Jun 29, 2006
57
0
6
Ladyluvr69 said:
Which I find a silly policy.

This should be a discussion board of all that is happening not a biased board of only the few who pay to promote themselves.
I agree. If you can only review advertisers or even professionals, it defeats what I thought was the purpose of this board. You should be able to review anyone including my ex gf!!! lol
 
M

Moderator

Review TERB's posting guidelines in the lounge.

Rule # 11 has been in place since the rules were originally posted in 2004, as has rule #7 which prohibits posting of personal information.

And, Ladyluvr69, if you read the rules carefully, you'll note that they don't have to advertise HERE.
 
Jan 21, 2004
113
9
18
No Fixed Address
With all due respect Mod, Quest reviews have been tolerated in spite of the rules for some time. A quick search of "Quest" in the Ottawa section is proof of that.

Some of us count on Terb as a valuable resource when looking into the safety aspect of meeting Quest girls. If we can't review them, can we at least post to confirm a successful liason, as opposed to a grab the money and take-off type of experience. (Perhaps limit Quest info to one specific Quest thread?)

I'm not sure the initial intent of the policy meant to exclude the "pro amateur". Many girls who started on Quest have gone on to become terb advertisers, I believe 427Jenn/Cookie out of Mississauga is a possible example.

At the next Moderator's Conference could we ask you to review the intent of this policy?
 
M

Moderator

PM your concerns to Fred Zed.

The intent of the rules is to prevent personal information from being posted on TERB. Some possible personal information was posted lately, which lead to the removal of the thread in question.

None of the mods have time to determine if information posted is personal or professional, therefore the prudent course of action is to remove such threads and posts.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,924
898
113
Ladyluvr69 said:
Which I find a silly policy.

This should be a discussion board of all that is happening not a biased board of only the few who pay to promote themselves.
Seems like someone said something like this lately.

"Actually NO

CMJ has rules.

The staff at CMJ can provide you that information and only them.

Sorry. "

Seems a little hypocrtical no?
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
Moderator said:
Review TERB's posting guidelines in the lounge.

Rule # 11 has been in place since the rules were originally posted in 2004, as has rule #7 which prohibits posting of personal information.

And, Ladyluvr69, if you read the rules carefully, you'll note that they don't have to advertise HERE.

Ok I misunderstood. My mistake. I Apologize for jumping the gun. I am man enough to admit I was wrong.

But... There are many quests girls that advertise of craigslist and although its a free site it should still be an accepted site.
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
maurice93 said:
Seems like someone said something like this lately.

"Actually NO

CMJ has rules.

The staff at CMJ can provide you that information and only them.

Sorry. "

Seems a little hypocrtical no?
mmm COMPLETELY different.

I did not say its acceptable to post personal information. I said we should be allowed to review Anyone.

Did you not read?

The post on CMJ was asking for their information.


So.......
 

Meesh

It was VICIOUS!
Jun 3, 2002
3,954
256
83
Toronto
Ladyluvr69 said:
mmm your not too bright are you. COMPLETELY different.

I did not say its acceptable to post personal information. I said we should be allowed to review Anyone.

Can you read?

The post on CMJ was asking for their information.


So.......
Nice style you have there, ladyluvr.

The mod could easily have phrased his response to you as...

"mmmm....you're not too bright, are you ladyluvr. Can you read?" And how would you have taken that??

Try a little diplomacy instead of putting someone down.
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
Meesh said:
Nice style you have there, ladyluvr.

The mod could easily have phrased his response to you as...

"mmmm....you're not too bright, are you ladyluvr. Can you read?" And how would you have taken that??

Try a little diplomacy instead of putting someone down.
LOL read his response first. I was merely responding to him but Ill reword it
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,924
898
113
Ladyluvr69 said:
mmm your not too bright are you. COMPLETELY different.

I did not say its acceptable to post personal information. I said we should be allowed to review Anyone.

Can you read?

The post on CMJ was asking for their information.


So.......
Well, I'd rather be dumb, then someone who thinks a certain spa is the "Ultimate Spa".
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
maurice93 said:
Well, I'd rather be dumb, then someone who thinks a certain spa is the "Ultimate Spa".

Dude I reworded it so reword yours. And remember who started it...it was not me
 

Ladyluvr69

Active member
Jan 9, 2007
396
41
28
tired of peoples attitudes and when you respond other people attack you and not the one who started it

Meesh your a jerk and I hope you get attacked like you like to do it.
 
Last edited:

Meesh

It was VICIOUS!
Jun 3, 2002
3,954
256
83
Toronto
LMAO.

Somebody says a post of yours is hypocritical and you take it as an attack.

You suggest that that person is 'not too bright' but that's just a response.

You reword your post, but don't bother to apologize.

And then the infamous and oh, so 'grown-up' "you started it!"

And you're leaving because of THEIR attitudes???

Don't let the door hit you on the way out, 'dude.'
 
Toronto Escorts