Myopia in reality

[Liminal]

I agree, you use some tired cliches

Your version:

"America is the true satan of the world!

How original!"

But remember, you said it.

 

[Wired For Sound]

Liminal: I knew you were going to say that!

Can't express the concepts yourself?

If we want to read other peoples works, we can. Your post is more than fifty percent the work of someone else. In addition, there is almost no relevance to what Monkeylove posted. It's like you don't know how to engage in the debate and try to reframe it into a contest of pasted quotes from the only sources you are familiar with.

LOL, you've got no clue. What a fool you are. The point I was making by quoting John Locke was that those first to defend liberty of conscience were NOT the poseur liberals but the real (or classical) liberals who are now referred to as Libertarians.

And how was I to prove that if I didn't quote someone like Locke at length?

I cannot understand what idolatry, covetousness, uncharitableness, and idleness have to do with the Monkeylove's post. The connection is so weak as to be meaningless.

Such a fool you are. Read the entire quote and think of it's ESSENTIAL MEANING to freedom of thought. Do you need to be spoon fed as well?

Why can't you offer original insights or at least personal opinions that you can defend yourself with reason.

OOOOOH yeah, original like your self loathing anti Americanism? (and don't tell me you can't be self loathing because you're not Amercan, your freedom that you love today was most fully developed in the USA). Liminal you're sooooo original. LOL, you're soooo controverial.

In truth, you are such a conformist and also extremely credulous: "Israeli soldiers routinely use Palestinians as shields when entering houses." Liminal will not provide a reference out of fear that I'll say that he isn't original. The problem with Liminal is he doesn't get that it's Islamic Jihad, et al, that use innocents as shields not the Israelis. Try to use reason when evaluating the validity of what you read, Liminal.

 

[DenWa]

Liminal...you need to get laid...simmer down before you fall off that soapbox.

 

[Liminal]

Locke was the first?

What if he was second? Does that make one iota of difference?

Monkeylove's post has nothing to do with who was first, second, third or thirtieth. That was never remotely the content of his message

Yet, to you, like a student in public school, the best you could come up with was who you thought was first.

Maybe you can explain why, who came first, is central or substantive to Monkeylove's post.

You won't because you don't have the intellectual horsepower.

 

[papasmerf]

Whos' on first

Whats on second

I don't know..................third base

I don't give a damn..........He's our short stop


(somethings you just can not resist)

 

[Liminal]

In regards to Israeli soldiers

In regards to Israeli soldiers using Palestinians as Human Shields.

What would constitute proof for you?

News reports in Israeli newspapers?

Israeli court decisions?

Reports from B'Tselem?

Please, have the courage to answer.

 

[Liminal]

Is it written in secret ink?

From your post Wired, the quote you chose to respond to:

"Originally posted by monkeylove
....According to you the US is infallible and all the world's woes are cause by liberals, leftists and non-neoconservatives, brilliant logic. These same “liberals” fought for equal rights in the US when the conservatives were in favor of segregation!!! Think where we would be today with an unopposed McCarthyism; there is validity in all view points, maybe you should try a little tolerance and acceptance of differing view. Oh I forgot there is no “right” view but your own!... "

Where does Monkeylove make a reference to Locke in here? Where did Monkeylove make a claim to anyone being first?

Is it written in secret ink? Do you have to read it backwards?