Munir **********h, Ex-StatsCan Head, Says Harper's Debt Policies Risk Canada's Future

twizz

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
1,974
0
0
The name S H E I K H is blocked out by *********

Lhttp://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/8022198
Daniel Tencer Business Editor, Huffington Post Canada

A former head of Statistics Canada has waded into the federal election campaign, arguing in a newspaper column that the Harper government’s dual policies of fighting deficits and boosting the housing market are risking Canada’s economic future.

In a column published in the Globe and Mail Friday, Munir **********h said Canada has managed to hold down growth in its public debt better than most G7 countries — but at the price of running up risky levels of household debt.

“Could it be that our zeal in balancing our government books come hell or high water may be contributing to the buildup of household debt and risking our future economic prospects, as well as the present?” **********h asks in his column.

“That seems quite likely in an economy in which the private sector is reluctant to invest, and things are not going to be pretty with the crash in oil prices and the resulting slashing of investment in this sector.”
Advertisement
AdChoices

Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed **********h to head Statistics Canada in 2008. **********h resigned in a public letter in 2010, in which he objected to Harper’s controversial decision to end the mandatory census, replacing it with a voluntary National Household Survey.

In words that have since been echoed by numerous economists and statisticians, **********h said the switch to a voluntary census would harm the government’s ability to collect data.

**********h noted in Friday’s column that Canada’s national debt grew far less between 2006 and 2013 than was the case in other G7 countries, growing 10 per cent relative to the economy, while the U.S., U.K., France and Japan saw run-ups in the scale of 35 to 40 per cent in that period, which includes the Great Recession.
Related Articles

But **********h says that, instead, Canada has relied on a massive run-up in household debt. The country has seen “the largest increase in the household-debt-to-income ratio of all the G7 countries, at about 30 percentage points – double the next-largest increase, in Italy, and 50 percentage points higher than the U.S., where household debt ratio fell,” **********h says.

Add up the public debt numbers with the household debt numbers, and Canada has seen some of the highest increases in total debt among G7 countries. That “paints a grim picture for Canada,” **********h writes.

But Canada’s method of having consumers run up debt instead of the government is a riskier way of getting indebted, **********h argues.

“Government borrowing does not impose a future risk, because governments don’t go bankrupt when borrowing to invest intelligently. But increases in household debt do carry that risk,” **********h asserts.

household debt to income

This chart published by Deutsche Bank earlier this year shows Canadian household debt levels rising beyond U.S. household debt levels.

Harper has made several campaign promises so far designed to make things easier for homeowners and homebuyers. He has announced a plan to make permanent the home renovation tax credit, at an annual cost to taxpayers of $1.5 billion. The temporary credit already in place has saved more than 3 million Canadians more than $700 on home renovations, Harper said.

The Conservative leader has also promised to increase the amount first-time home buyers can withdraw from their RRSPs for a down payment, to $35,000 from $25,000.

At the same time, Harper has been heavily critical of political opponents’ spending plans, arguing that deficit spending risks turning Canada into another Greece.

That “does not square well with his own government’s track record of adding $175-billion to federal net debt since 2007-08,’ **********h writes.

“Responsible leadership would use fiscal policy as a stabilization tool, running deficits during bad times (the current situation being one of them) and running surpluses in good times.”

The issue of Canada’s soaring house prices and the high debt levels that come with them has not made much of an impact in the current campaign. A column in Macleans suggests that may be because politicians of all stripes have too much to gain from the housing market’s status quo.

That’s especially true for Harper, whose “core of support is those home-owning Boomers and seniors who would benefit” from further house price hikes, Macleans’ Jason Kirby writes.

However NDP leader Tom Mulcair has expressed concerns that house price growth may have gone too far.

“I think that right now there is a serious danger. I think that [in] some cities the prices are too high, and I also know that young families can’t get into [those markets],” Mulcair said last week.

“There could be a bubble created there, and we could be in for a terrible surprise.”
 
Last edited:

twizz

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
1,974
0
0
http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/8020980

Ralph Goodale Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, Member of Parliament for Wascana and former Finance Minister

CP

On Stephen Harper's watch, Canada has suffered through two recessions. He failed to anticipate either one.

Before the first one (which began in late 2008), Mr. Harper's management was reckless. He ignored warnings about housing bubbles and banking weaknesses in the United States. He overspent by three-times the rate of inflation. He mangled the tax base. He eliminated all previous federal contingency reserves and prudence factors, and put the country back on the verge of a deficit once again -- all BEFORE any downturn actually hit.

Mr. Harper foolishly denied a recession was likely and predicted five consecutive surpluses. He was completely wrong and left the country vulnerable and ill-prepared.

Recovery from that first recession started in the summer of 2009, but it was slow and uncertain. Obsessed with his ideology of austerity -- trying to eviscerate the federal government at every turn -- Mr. Harper failed to lead Canada to full recovery before a second recession began last winter. And despite Conservative bravado about a mythical balanced budget in 2015, the Harper regime remains in deficit for the eighth consecutive year.
Advertisement
AdChoices

As a consequence, Canadians are stuck with $158-billion in new Harper debt -- without much to show for it. There are 160,000 more jobless Canadians today than before Mr. Harper took power. Job quality is at a 25-year low. Household debt is near a record high. Canada's trade deficit this year has topped $13-billion. Business and consumer confidence are down. And Mr. Harper has cemented his reputation for having the worst economic growth record of any Prime Minister since R.B. Bennett in the 1930s.

2015-08-21-1440168313-5113357-EconomicGrowthByPM.png

Even Mr. Harper's most ardent apologists have to admit that this statement is 100 per cent statistically correct. No Prime Minister has done worse on growth in 80 years. But, they say, look at all the troubles he had to contend with.
Related Articles
Tories Shut Down Move To Get Oliver To Testify On Budget Claim
The Conservatives Have Steered Canada Into a Preventable Recession
Mr. Harper's Feeble Leadership Has Resulted in a Feeble Economy
How the Government's Interest Payments Are Costing You
Why Reports Say Canada's Economy Won't Recover For Several Years

That plaintive Conservative whine doesn't hold water. Every government has its challenges to confront. They can and should be measured on how well they cope with the hands they are dealt.

The Liberal government elected in 1993 inherited from its Conservative predecessor a fiscal mess of unprecedented proportions. The annual federal deficit was approaching $40-billion. The accumulated federal debt was the equivalent of nearly 70 per cent of GDP. One-third of every federal tax dollar was gobbled up in debt servicing costs.

The international financial media referred to Canada disparagingly as a candidate for honourary membership in the Third World.

And there were cascading challenges to face: Two international currency crises. A separatist referendum. The SARS pandemic. An ice-storm in central Canada. A hurricane across Atlantic Canada. A massive power failure that shutdown our industrial heartland. The pressing need to rescue the Canada Pension Plan and refinance Canadian medicare. The 9-11 crisis. George W. Bush in Iraq. The beginning of the War in Afghanistan. And the list goes on.

But from this tumult, Canada emerged stronger. The world's financial press wrote about "the Maple Leaf Miracle" and Canada as a "fiscal virtuoso".

The Liberal legacy was a decade of balanced budgets, average annual economic growth over three per cent, consistent trade surpluses every month of every year, 3.4-million net new jobs, lower debt, lower taxes, record high Transfer Payments to the provinces, major investments in such critical priorities as children and families, education, science, innovation and infrastructure, a financial surplus of $13-billion per year, and one of the strongest fiscal situation in the western world.

That's what Mr. Harper inherited in 2006. His tenure also benefited from a slightly stronger global economic growth rate overall than the Liberals had to work with.

But Mr. Harper blew it. Confronted with new challenges (as every prime minister is), he failed to cope with them successfully. His plan is in tatters. He now thrashes about for scapegoats, blaming Obama or the Chinese or the Greeks or the world at large.

Just as in his PMO scandal with Mike Duffy, Mr. Harper cannot bring himself to shoulder his own responsibility. He cannot look Canadians in the eye and tell them the truth.

And that's why this country wants change. Real change, to a new government that is truly better.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts