Monique- Ottawa

[Dacor]

Monique

I was in Ottawa last week. Tried her number three times. No answer. That was disheartening.

I too had a hard time getting a hold of her until I emailed her. she replied within a few hours and things went smooth from there on.

She did mention to me that she doesn't keep her phone on all the time. It seems to me that she's not one of those "money hungry" SPs. She turns her phone on when she wants clients.

BTW: If you're a sucker for beautiful eyes, you MUST see her.

 

[ricflairjuniour]

Who is better looking, facially, Monique or Nicole ?

 

[tooltime35]

Monique, by a mile.

Nicole is not really all that great, folks. Not compared to monique at least

 

[johnyj]

Monique gets my vote by far. She is striking -those eyes!!

 

[Spanky McDougal]

well

I think Monique has the edge for the prettiness (but the difference might be 1 point on the classic 10 pt scale). I would give Nicole the edge on body though. As far as I am concerned, Nicole's body more closely approximates the 'ideal' for her body type.

 

[tooltime35]

Here is the final polling data....the conclusion to this sily forum....

I went to se Nicole after reading slobbering posts about the girl and seeing slinky online photos. She shows up at the door in cargo pants and a tshirt. Looks a little on the unmanicured side with a greasy kind of look. I'm thinkin --- I know where this is going, another one for the research file, but no screaming whoop of a time. when she loses the cargo pants, I find tatoos - kinda big ones. For $150? No thanks. Big boobs that define gravity by their use of it.

I go to Monique's after reading similarly slobbering reviews.. the door opens and she is like hiding behind it. I literally have to peer around and figure, should I look or should I just run? If she's hiding is that a good thing?

This girl is unbelievable. Very attractive and she is wearing this long pink mesh neglige with a mathing thong. Just like the EC pics, but she is actually thinner than the web site gives off. Slight, slight stretch marks on the butt is all the markings. If you want a GFE, she actually looks like one and feels like one. CBJ is pheonmenal and she is NORMAL, like in the head normal.

Anyhow fellas, monique takes the cake. She also delivers what she sells. She is in the category of Christa, and Carol Ann/Pauline in terms of looks. She is like Carol or Sandy in the service department

 

[peterpiper]

monique

I agree, this woman is phenominal. As for hiding behind the door, I too encounter this each time I viset her. I mentioned it to her jokingly, she explained that she simply doesn't know who is in the hallway and is being descrete. Doesn't need anyone seeing her open the door dressed like that etc. Made sense after she explained it to me. She has it hands down -face, body and personality, as far as I'm concerned,

 

[selection]

who are they?

Christa, and Carol Ann/Pauline, are they in Ottawa? and which sandy are you talking about? Ya for the door thing a lot of sp's that do incall do that its to be discreet. It's your show, your paying for it not the others is the way I see it ahahah

 

[Spanky McDougal]

To be fair, I think whether someone prefers Monique or Nicole will depend on what they are looking for.

To conclude that Monique takes the cake is an opinion, a vote. It is informative in that sense. If the majority of people prefer a girl over another, then that is informative because you too are more likely to prefer said girl.

If I could only see Monique or Nicole exclusively, I would choose Monique. That's my vote.

If I want others to make an informed choice, then I give them all the 'objective' information I can. From there, we are all left to judge which description best fits our subjective needs.

Slobering opinions just like opinions supported by arguments (e.g. the presence of tatoo) are both votes based on subjective experiences, and nothing more.

 

[Spanky McDougal]

Clarification

I just wanted to correct an ambiguity in my review of Monique. They way I worded one of my sentences, it seems like I am implying that I had a bad experience with Nicole (i.e. 'blood everywhere'). This is not the case.

I was trying to say that I have had bad experiences, like the time I went out-of-province and received a visit from a menstrating call girl. I have also had great experiences, like when I went to see Nicole. Monique was also a great experience.

I hope this has clarified my intended meaning, and I hope that nobody misunderstood me. I would hate to think that Nicole lost business because of me.

 

[too2shy]

Re: Clarification

I just wanted to correct an ambiguity in my review of Monique. They way I worded one of my sentences, it seems like I am implying that I had a bad experience with Nicole (i.e. 'blood everywhere'). This is not the case.

I was trying to say that I have had bad experiences, like the time I went out-of-province and received a visit from a menstrating call girl. I have also had great experiences, like when I went to see Nicole. Monique was also a great experience.

I hope this has clarified my intended meaning, and I hope that nobody misunderstood me. I would hate to think that Nicole lost business because of me.

lol. i was thinking.. not cool.. not cool.. bloods gross. trust me. gross. i've encountered it like 4or5 times with different sps.. all who seem to be like.. oh. just that.... !!!!

 

[too2shy]

Here is the final polling data....the conclusion to this sily forum....

I went to se Nicole after reading slobbering posts about the girl and seeing slinky online photos. She shows up at the door in cargo pants and a tshirt. Looks a little on the unmanicured side with a greasy kind of look. I'm thinkin --- I know where this is going, another one for the research file, but no screaming whoop of a time. when she loses the cargo pants, I find tatoos - kinda big ones. For $150? No thanks. Big boobs that define gravity by their use of it.

I go to Monique's after reading similarly slobbering reviews.. the door opens and she is like hiding behind it. I literally have to peer around and figure, should I look or should I just run? If she's hiding is that a good thing?

This girl is unbelievable. Very attractive and she is wearing this long pink mesh neglige with a mathing thong. Just like the EC pics, but she is actually thinner than the web site gives off. Slight, slight stretch marks on the butt is all the markings. If you want a GFE, she actually looks like one and feels like one. CBJ is pheonmenal and she is NORMAL, like in the head normal.

Anyhow fellas, monique takes the cake. She also delivers what she sells. She is in the category of Christa, and Carol Ann/Pauline in terms of looks. She is like Carol or Sandy in the service department

yawn. care to slobber on

my

B==o

and then you can write a slobbering review of it! for this "sily forum" =)

 

[ladylover]

yawn? I found that review to be very helpful and acurate.

 

[too2shy]

yawn? I found that review to be very helpful and acurate.

members of this forum dont tend to knock other peoples prior reviews or call them "slobbering" even after a whole 26posts. just a general rule of thumb. and heck.. its not even good manners =)