Toronto Girlfriends

MCCARTHYISM 2023: ARAB JOURNALIST IN OZ FIRED FOR HER VIEWS

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,550
736
113
" In one recent post, she said 2023 would be remembered as a year when calling for a cease-fire seemed more offensive than “using propaganda, misinformation and disinformation to justify a genocide in the making.”

The question remains, will the 156 lawyers who launched the campaign be hauled before the professional body that licenses them?


"Mr. Lyons said the ABC “faced one of its darkest days” last Tuesday when The Melbourne Age and its sister publications outlined how a letter-writing campaign pressured the ABC’s top two leaders in Ms. Lattouf’s case.

“I was embarrassed that a group of 156 lawyers could laugh at how easy it was to manipulate the ABC,” Mr. Lyons said"



A Post on Gaza Leads to Turmoil at Australia’s Public Broadcaster
The hiring and forced departure of a Lebanese Australian journalist has exposed long-simmering issues at one of the country’s most trusted institutions.

  • Share full article




A view of building emblazoned with the ABC logo.

Natasha FrostDamien Cave
By Natasha Frost and Damien Cave
Reporting from Melbourne and Sydney, Australia
Jan. 23, 2024
Sign up for the Israel-Hamas War Briefing. The latest news about the conflict. Get it sent to your inbox.

The social media post simply pointed to a report from Human Rights Watch, but it was critical of Israel and came from a Lebanese Australian journalist whom critics considered biased.
Antoinette Lattouf, a well-known figure in the Australian media, was on a brief contract with the country’s main public broadcaster when she posted the Instagram story with the caption: “HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war.”
The next day, as pro-Israel lawyers continued a private campaign to have her ousted — which had begun before she started the job — Ms. Lattouf was told by managers at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that her radio hosting gig would conclude early.



The dispute over whether that was justified, now mired in legal wrangling, has thrown one of Australia’s most trusted institutions into strife and, on Monday, resulted in a rare “vote of no confidence” in its top editor. It has become another example of how intense debate over the Israel-Hamas conflict is revealing deep fault lines of identity and divided opinion in different parts of the world.

Image
A woman in a burgundy top.

Antoinette Lattouf said the Australian Broadcasting Corporation unlawfully dismissed her amid outside pressure.Credit...Peter Morris


The ABC, publicly funded and with an obligation to represent all stripes of Australian life, is confronting the collision of two contentious issues. First, how do news outlets and their employees cover hot-button topics in a time of stark political divides and strong personal brands? And second, as its journalists allege, has Australia’s beleaguered public broadcaster been so weakened by underfunding and right-wing political attacks that it will not stand up for its journalists, especially people of color and women?
At a fraught union meeting of about 200 employees on Monday, John Lyons, the ABC’s global affairs editor, who was set to fly to Israel on Tuesday, said the broadcaster’s independence and reputation had been “compromised” by its willingness to yield to outside pressure on such an important matter.
Mr. Lyons said the ABC “faced one of its darkest days” last Tuesday when The Melbourne Age and its sister publications outlined how a letter-writing campaign pressured the ABC’s top two leaders in Ms. Lattouf’s case.
“I was embarrassed that a group of 156 lawyers could laugh at how easy it was to manipulate the ABC,” Mr. Lyons said, according to multiple sources. Members of the union voted 129 to 3, with dozens of abstentions, to pass a motion saying that they had “lost confidence” in David Anderson, the ABC’s managing director and top editor.



In a statement, Mr. Anderson said he had “always defended the ABC’s journalism” and would continue to do so. The ABC did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In recent years, many ABC journalists — some Indigenous, others of Arab, Asian or African descent — have left after complaining that they experienced racism or were held to different standards than white colleagues.


David Anderson, the managing director at the ABC, was the subject of a “vote of no confidence” on Monday.Credit...Rohan Thomson/EPA, via Shutterstock

A man in a dark suit speaking from a lectern.

Stan Grant, a high-profile Indigenous Australian journalist, publicly resigned in May, after a torrent of racist abuse over his role in coverage of the coronation of King Charles III. At the time, he said he had received no public support from the organization. Nour Haydar, a political reporter, also resigned earlier this month, citing concerns about coverage of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as well as the ABC’s treatment of culturally diverse staff.

Diversity struggles are not unique to the national broadcaster. A study of Australian media in 2022 found that only around 10 percent of hosts and reporters on the air during a two-week period were from a non-European background, far below their proportion of the population.



Ms. Lattouf, 40, had been a frequent contributor at the ABC. The author of “How to Lose Friends and Influence White People,” she has called for greater diversity in the media and has often criticized Israel’s military actions in Gaza. In one recent post, she said 2023 would be remembered as a year when calling for a cease-fire seemed more offensive than “using propaganda, misinformation and disinformation to justify a genocide in the making.”
Last month, the ABC hired her to fill in for a host on a Sydney radio station for five days. On her first day, she was informed by a manager that “Jewish lobbyists were unhappy she was on the air,” according to legal filings, and urged to avoid potentially controversial topics on social media.
The following day, in an Instagram story, she shared a Human Rights Watch post that accused Israel of starving civilians in Gaza “as a weapon of war.” Colleagues at the ABC had separately covered the report. Less than 24 hours later, Ms. Lattouf was told that she would not be returning to the air for the final two days of the contract.
Ms. Lattouf has filed an unlawful dismissal dispute, saying that she was discriminated against for her race and political opinion.
“It’s devastating, personally,” Ms. Lattouf said in an interview, “but I think more so it’s devastating in the message it sends.”



In an open letter, Elaine Pearson, the Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said that the removal of Ms. Lattouf “could have a chilling effect on the ability of Australian journalists to share human rights content from reputable organizations.” She urged the ABC to “clarify its policies around what staff are permitted to repost” — echoing a request from its journalists.
In legal filings, the broadcaster denied that Ms. Lattouf’s political opinion or race had anything to do with its decision. It now says that it did not fire her, and it has called on the Fair Work Commission, a government employment tribunal, to dismiss the dispute.
The ABC has also said lobbying played no role in taking her off air, though the leaked WhatsApp messages published by local media showed the extent of pressure directed at management.
In the group chat, one lawyer wrote that she had told the ABC that Ms. Lattouf’s employment “should be terminated immediately,” encouraging other lawyers to write letters “so they feel there is an actual legal threat.” She added that she had already threatened to escalate the legal matter even though “I know there is probably no actionable offense against the ABC.”
Members of the group did not respond to requests for comment. In interviews with the Australian news media, they have not denied that the messages are theirs, while arguing that there was no coordinated campaign to get Ms. Lattouf fired. Some have since reported being subjected to death threats and abuse.



Their efforts appear to have dovetailed, in the minds of many ABC journalists, with a wider culture war. Conservative politicians often accuse the broadcaster of being too left-wing and have slashed its budget. Between 1985 and 2020, the ABC saw a nearly 30 percent decrease in real funding, according to a report from the progressive group GetUp.
Media critics frequently note that Australia’s conservative media leadership, especially at outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, have also relentlessly sought to undermine the ABC, which it sees as its publicly funded competition.
In 2017, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, a Sudanese Australian journalist, said she was all but bullied out of the ABC — and Australia — after drawing attention to the plight of refugees in offshore detention. The partisan outrage, fueled partly by heated coverage in News Corp outlets, led to a pig’s head being dumped at the Islamic primary school she attended.
The ABC’s funding insecurity has partially abated under the center-left government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. But pressure — from government, powerful corporations and advocates, mostly but not exclusively from the right — remains intense.
For Ms. Lattouf, the recourse is clear. She said she is hoping to be reinstated at the broadcaster after a formal apology.
“I love the ABC,” she said, “and I plan to get back on it.”
Natasha Frost writes The Times’s weekday newsletter The Europe Morning Briefing and reports on Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. She is based in Melbourne, Australia. More about Natasha Frost
Damien Cave is an international correspondent for The Times, covering the Indo-Pacific region. He is based in Sydney, Australia. More about Damien Cave
A version of this article appears in print on Jan. 24, 2024, Section A, Page 8 of the New York edition with the headline: Reaction to Social Media Post Enflames Tension at Australia’s Public Broadcaster. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
 

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,550
736
113
AND AT BARNARD IT IS: "IMPERMISSIBLE POLITICAL SPEECH"



Barnard College’s Restrictions on Political Speech Prompt Outcry
Professors and free speech advocates are protesting a decision by the college to monitor and remove pro-Palestinian statements and other speech the college deems too political.

  • Share full article



Students are seen from behind walking up a staircase on Barnard’s campus lined by grassy steps, with buildings on either side.

Barnard College is regulating when and how protests can take place on campus. Credit...Bing Guan for The New York Times

Students are seen from behind walking up a staircase on Barnard’s campus lined by grassy steps, with buildings on either side.

Sharon Otterman
By Sharon Otterman
Jan. 24, 2024, 3:00 a.m. ET
Sign up for the Israel-Hamas War Briefing. The latest news about the conflict. Get it sent to your inbox.

Three weeks after the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel, the Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Barnard College in New York posted a statement on its departmental website in support of the Palestinian people.
Below the statement, the professors posted links to academic work supporting their view that the struggle of Palestinians against “settler colonial war, occupation and apartheid” was also a feminist issue. Two days later, they found that section of the webpage had been removed, without warning, by Barnard administrators.
What happened next has sparked a crisis over academic freedom and free expression at Barnard at a time when the Israel-Hamas conflict has led to tense protests on American college campuses and heated discussions about what constitutes acceptable speech.
Asked to explain why the page was removed, college administrators told the department that the statement and links were “impermissible political speech,” a statement from the department said.



The Barnard administration then, in late October and November, rewrote its policies on political activity, website governance and campus events, giving itself wide latitude to decide what was and was not permissible political speech on campus, as well as final say over everything posted on Barnard’s website.
The moves caught the attention of the New York Civil Liberties Union, which wrote a letter to Barnard’s new president, Laura Rosenbury, in December, warning that the website and political speech policies violated fundamental free speech principles and were “incompatible with a sound understanding of academic freedom.”
  • .
“Such a regime will inevitably serve as a license for censorship,” the letter said.
In a statement, the Barnard administration said that it had barred college resources from being used for political activity for at least a decade. Another policy barring political signs from being posted on campus was not directed at any ideology, it contended.
“Barnard supports the academic freedom of our faculty and the free expression of our faculty and students,” Kathryn Gerlach, a Barnard spokeswoman, said in an email.
Janet Jakobsen, a professor of women’s, gender and sexuality studies, said that the removal of her department’s pro-Palestinian material was only one of the new challenges to free expression that students and faculty were experiencing.



Faculty members who have posted pro-Palestinian signs on their office doors have been asked to remove them or put them inside, she and other faculty said. And about two dozen students who attended a peaceful, but unauthorized, pro-Palestinian campus protest in December have been summoned to appear before a college disciplinary committee.

“The purpose of academic freedom and free expression is precisely to contribute to democratic discussion,” Dr. Jakobsen said. “And so to treat our students as if their participation in participatory democracy is so deeply dangerous, that a demonstration at which there is no disruption should be disciplined, is a very strong statement.”
Since the Oct. 7 attacks, administrators have been facing pressure from some donors, alumni and students and faculty to limit some pro-Palestinian speech on the grounds that opposing Zionism or the state of Israel can veer into antisemitism and can make those who support Israel feel uncomfortable.
Colleges often defend the measures as necessary for security and to create a calmer environment. (During a pro-Palestinian demonstration at Columbia last Friday, for example, some Barnard and Columbia students said someone sprayed them with a foul-smelling chemical, and several sought medical treatment after.)
At both Columbia and Barnard, an all-women’s college that is formally part of Columbia University but has its own leadership and policies, administrators have asked the community to refrain from slogans and words that others may find hurtful. Both institutions have also issued reworded administrative rules that officially apply to everyone. But critics say that in reality, they are being used to curtail views the college does not want aired.



Under new rules Barnard emailed to faculty on Nov. 6, for example, all academic departments must submit changes to the content of their websites to the Office of the Provost for review and approval. All content on the college’s website may be amended or removed without notice, a related policy states.
Arthur Eisenberg, executive counsel with the N.Y.C.L.U., said that the policy gives the administration discretion to determine what is permissible academic discourse on the website. “And that’s the problem,” he said.
While the pro-Palestinian statement was taken down, for example, a statement by the Africana Studies Department decrying anti-Black racism and state-sanctioned violence in the wake of the killing of George Floyd in 2020 was permitted to stay up.
Barnard also issued a policy on Nov. 13 defining political activity in a way that many faculty members say was broader than previously understood. Rather than just barring partisan activity like rallies from campus, the policy now defines it as “all written communications that comment on specific actions, statements, or positions taken by public officials or governmental bodies at local, state, federal, and international levels.”
Faculty can make such statements so long as they make clear they are speaking for themselves but not the college. But political statements cannot be posted on the Barnard website without approval, and “no member of the college may post signs containing political statements” on the college grounds.



A newly articulated events policy also requires that 28 days’ notice must be given before most public demonstrations on campus are held.
In response to the administration’s actions, more than 1,000 Columbia and Barnard faculty, students and alumni have signed a letter saying that academic freedom is under attack at Barnard. More than 100 Barnard faculty members have also signed a letter sent to President Rosenbury on Sunday expressing concern over the recent summoning of roughly 20 students to “inquiry meetings” about accusations that they violated the code of conduct.
A new group, Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine, published a letter on the school newspaper’s website on Monday, pledging to “take back” Barnard and Columbia. The letter said the group would fight efforts to “curtail speech that is critical of the actions taken by the State of Israel, that sympathizes with Palestinians, or that attempts to place the current conflict in a longer historical context.”
The Barnard faculty also held a vote in December affirming the “Chicago Principles,” a commitment to free expression, several professors said.
In its letter to President Rosenbury, the N.Y.C.L.U. suggested that instead of blocking academic speech on the Barnard website, faculty be permitted to publish freely provided they make clear with disclaimers that their views are not necessarily that of the college.



The Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies has now created its own website that is not administered by the college, and posted its pro-Palestinian statement and resources there. It has for the past two months been in discussions with Barnard’s provost office about permitting a link from its official website to this website, Dr. Jakobsen said.
Only two of the resources — including a newly published book chapter by a faculty member — have been permitted to be published on the main Barnard website so far, she said.
Sharon Otterman is a Times reporter covering higher education, public health and other issues facing New York City. More about Sharon Otterman
  • Share full article


 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,944
5,386
113
Lewiston, NY
" In one recent post, she said 2023 would be remembered as a year when calling for a cease-fire seemed more offensive than “using propaganda, misinformation and disinformation to justify a genocide in the making.”

The question remains, will the 156 lawyers who launched the campaign be hauled before the professional body that licenses them?


"Mr. Lyons said the ABC “faced one of its darkest days” last Tuesday when The Melbourne Age and its sister publications outlined how a letter-writing campaign pressured the ABC’s top two leaders in Ms. Lattouf’s case.

“I was embarrassed that a group of 156 lawyers could laugh at how easy it was to manipulate the ABC,” Mr. Lyons said"



A Post on Gaza Leads to Turmoil at Australia’s Public Broadcaster
The hiring and forced departure of a Lebanese Australian journalist has exposed long-simmering issues at one of the country’s most trusted institutions.

  • Share full article




A view of building emblazoned with the ABC logo.

Natasha FrostDamien Cave
By Natasha Frost and Damien Cave
Reporting from Melbourne and Sydney, Australia
Jan. 23, 2024
Sign up for the Israel-Hamas War Briefing. The latest news about the conflict. Get it sent to your inbox.

The social media post simply pointed to a report from Human Rights Watch, but it was critical of Israel and came from a Lebanese Australian journalist whom critics considered biased.
Antoinette Lattouf, a well-known figure in the Australian media, was on a brief contract with the country’s main public broadcaster when she posted the Instagram story with the caption: “HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war.”
The next day, as pro-Israel lawyers continued a private campaign to have her ousted — which had begun before she started the job — Ms. Lattouf was told by managers at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that her radio hosting gig would conclude early.



The dispute over whether that was justified, now mired in legal wrangling, has thrown one of Australia’s most trusted institutions into strife and, on Monday, resulted in a rare “vote of no confidence” in its top editor. It has become another example of how intense debate over the Israel-Hamas conflict is revealing deep fault lines of identity and divided opinion in different parts of the world.

Image
A woman in a burgundy top.

Antoinette Lattouf said the Australian Broadcasting Corporation unlawfully dismissed her amid outside pressure.Credit...Peter Morris


The ABC, publicly funded and with an obligation to represent all stripes of Australian life, is confronting the collision of two contentious issues. First, how do news outlets and their employees cover hot-button topics in a time of stark political divides and strong personal brands? And second, as its journalists allege, has Australia’s beleaguered public broadcaster been so weakened by underfunding and right-wing political attacks that it will not stand up for its journalists, especially people of color and women?
At a fraught union meeting of about 200 employees on Monday, John Lyons, the ABC’s global affairs editor, who was set to fly to Israel on Tuesday, said the broadcaster’s independence and reputation had been “compromised” by its willingness to yield to outside pressure on such an important matter.
Mr. Lyons said the ABC “faced one of its darkest days” last Tuesday when The Melbourne Age and its sister publications outlined how a letter-writing campaign pressured the ABC’s top two leaders in Ms. Lattouf’s case.
“I was embarrassed that a group of 156 lawyers could laugh at how easy it was to manipulate the ABC,” Mr. Lyons said, according to multiple sources. Members of the union voted 129 to 3, with dozens of abstentions, to pass a motion saying that they had “lost confidence” in David Anderson, the ABC’s managing director and top editor.



In a statement, Mr. Anderson said he had “always defended the ABC’s journalism” and would continue to do so. The ABC did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In recent years, many ABC journalists — some Indigenous, others of Arab, Asian or African descent — have left after complaining that they experienced racism or were held to different standards than white colleagues.


David Anderson, the managing director at the ABC, was the subject of a “vote of no confidence” on Monday.Credit...Rohan Thomson/EPA, via Shutterstock

A man in a dark suit speaking from a lectern.

Stan Grant, a high-profile Indigenous Australian journalist, publicly resigned in May, after a torrent of racist abuse over his role in coverage of the coronation of King Charles III. At the time, he said he had received no public support from the organization. Nour Haydar, a political reporter, also resigned earlier this month, citing concerns about coverage of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as well as the ABC’s treatment of culturally diverse staff.

Diversity struggles are not unique to the national broadcaster. A study of Australian media in 2022 found that only around 10 percent of hosts and reporters on the air during a two-week period were from a non-European background, far below their proportion of the population.



Ms. Lattouf, 40, had been a frequent contributor at the ABC. The author of “How to Lose Friends and Influence White People,” she has called for greater diversity in the media and has often criticized Israel’s military actions in Gaza. In one recent post, she said 2023 would be remembered as a year when calling for a cease-fire seemed more offensive than “using propaganda, misinformation and disinformation to justify a genocide in the making.”
Last month, the ABC hired her to fill in for a host on a Sydney radio station for five days. On her first day, she was informed by a manager that “Jewish lobbyists were unhappy she was on the air,” according to legal filings, and urged to avoid potentially controversial topics on social media.
The following day, in an Instagram story, she shared a Human Rights Watch post that accused Israel of starving civilians in Gaza “as a weapon of war.” Colleagues at the ABC had separately covered the report. Less than 24 hours later, Ms. Lattouf was told that she would not be returning to the air for the final two days of the contract.
Ms. Lattouf has filed an unlawful dismissal dispute, saying that she was discriminated against for her race and political opinion.
“It’s devastating, personally,” Ms. Lattouf said in an interview, “but I think more so it’s devastating in the message it sends.”



In an open letter, Elaine Pearson, the Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said that the removal of Ms. Lattouf “could have a chilling effect on the ability of Australian journalists to share human rights content from reputable organizations.” She urged the ABC to “clarify its policies around what staff are permitted to repost” — echoing a request from its journalists.
In legal filings, the broadcaster denied that Ms. Lattouf’s political opinion or race had anything to do with its decision. It now says that it did not fire her, and it has called on the Fair Work Commission, a government employment tribunal, to dismiss the dispute.
The ABC has also said lobbying played no role in taking her off air, though the leaked WhatsApp messages published by local media showed the extent of pressure directed at management.
In the group chat, one lawyer wrote that she had told the ABC that Ms. Lattouf’s employment “should be terminated immediately,” encouraging other lawyers to write letters “so they feel there is an actual legal threat.” She added that she had already threatened to escalate the legal matter even though “I know there is probably no actionable offense against the ABC.”
Members of the group did not respond to requests for comment. In interviews with the Australian news media, they have not denied that the messages are theirs, while arguing that there was no coordinated campaign to get Ms. Lattouf fired. Some have since reported being subjected to death threats and abuse.



Their efforts appear to have dovetailed, in the minds of many ABC journalists, with a wider culture war. Conservative politicians often accuse the broadcaster of being too left-wing and have slashed its budget. Between 1985 and 2020, the ABC saw a nearly 30 percent decrease in real funding, according to a report from the progressive group GetUp.
Media critics frequently note that Australia’s conservative media leadership, especially at outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, have also relentlessly sought to undermine the ABC, which it sees as its publicly funded competition.
In 2017, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, a Sudanese Australian journalist, said she was all but bullied out of the ABC — and Australia — after drawing attention to the plight of refugees in offshore detention. The partisan outrage, fueled partly by heated coverage in News Corp outlets, led to a pig’s head being dumped at the Islamic primary school she attended.
The ABC’s funding insecurity has partially abated under the center-left government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. But pressure — from government, powerful corporations and advocates, mostly but not exclusively from the right — remains intense.
For Ms. Lattouf, the recourse is clear. She said she is hoping to be reinstated at the broadcaster after a formal apology.
“I love the ABC,” she said, “and I plan to get back on it.”
Natasha Frost writes The Times’s weekday newsletter The Europe Morning Briefing and reports on Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. She is based in Melbourne, Australia. More about Natasha Frost
Damien Cave is an international correspondent for The Times, covering the Indo-Pacific region. He is based in Sydney, Australia. More about Damien Cave
A version of this article appears in print on Jan. 24, 2024, Section A, Page 8 of the New York edition with the headline: Reaction to Social Media Post Enflames Tension at Australia’s Public Broadcaster. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
History in the making. In the long run, history is going to treat the Zionist murderers and their supporters harshly...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,059
28,261
113
History in the making. In the long run, history is going to treat the Zionist murderers and their supporters harshly...
Fired for linking to a report from Human Rights Watch.

The zionists are getting desperate to try to shut down all reporting on their genocide.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,484
6,986
113
Wow, a reporter fired for violating company policy on perceived neutrality which gets turned into a complain she was fired because of her race.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,484
6,986
113
You think posting from Human Rights Watch is 'biased' now?
...
Based on how often you're posting here, I don't know if you've ever been employed but her bosses decided that wading in to the conflict violated her employment contract and harmed their reputation as an honest source of news which their business model is based on.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,059
28,261
113
Based on how often you're posting here, I don't know if you've ever been employed but her bosses decided that wading in to the conflict violated her employment contract and harmed their reputation as an honest source of news which their business model is based on.
Being fired for posting HRW reports is not about 'honest sources', its about people trying to shut down debate and bad news about Israel.
But that's all you've got left now.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,484
6,986
113
Being fired for posting HRW reports is not about 'honest sources', its about people trying to shut down debate and bad news about Israel.
But that's all you've got left now.
As I said, her company has a policy against social media posts on issues that might make them seem unbalanced.

It's funny how you scream so rabidly when anti-Israel voices are held to account for their actions while demanding pro-Israeli voices be silenced.
 
Toronto Escorts