Another one of those underage stings, but this time in Mississauga.
It’s so obvious to . Thanks for posting.
Another one of those underage stings, but this time in Mississauga.
Hi.It’s so obvious to . Thanks for posting.
I believe that is actually the same room as the previous one.Hi.
How do you know? What makes it obvious?
I'm not doubting you, bur I'm curious to know what to look for.
Thanks.
Yup you nailed it.I believe that is actually the same room as the previous one.
Might be the same person? But dressed differently.
Most ads tend to have at the very minimum a lot of cleavage. There is nothing in this one.
The 18 age also can be a contributing factor, with all the other stuff.
That and you message said person a request to meet up and they will say they are like really young.. or younger then they said or will say like 15 or something.
Could be wrapping up for the night..ads gone
ads gone
Well I would imagine that is one of the officers that's involved in this, and would be the first person you meet and if you continue....It was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.
In escort age, 35 is the old 29. Not that I am complaining.Well I would imagine that is one of the officers that's involved in this, and would be the first person you meet and if you continue....
Well then yeah.
But I agree 29 does seem like a reasonable deduction for that person's age.
Just by looking at those pics, I now know what the extreme special service meansIt was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.
I have it set so I only search in DurhamIt was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.
It was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.
That's ViviIt was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.
Ahh, I did not realize you got the wrong ad there.It was gone when I looked, but this come up.
No way she is underaged, I wonder if the pics are accurate [she looks older than the 29 listed age but still fine.
Very noice.