Select Company Escorts

Lol Amber Heard

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
81,013
107,388
113

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch

Depp sued her in England and the English judge called him a liar and laughed him out of court. Depp appealed. The Court of Appeal laughed his ass out of court. So he once again recruited his employees and hangers-on and sued her in America. I predict that he will lose again.
I thought he sued the Sun. Not her. This is about her directly. The Sun posted an article they believed to be true based on AHs lies. Big difference.

She is a joke and fucking lair. I know you believe her and her pussy power but many people are finally seeing through her.
 
Last edited:

springbloom

Active member
Apr 30, 2022
161
109
28
She doesn't even if have 50m even if she loses. What happens ? Courts put a lien on her future paychecks ?
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
She doesn't even if have 50m even if she loses. What happens ? Courts put a lien on her future paychecks ?
They can. If Depp wants. I think he just wants to prove he is not the abusive aggressor like she is lying about. He lost two major franchises and has been blacklisted in Hollywood. This would see him be able to start his career again. Those two franchises are now fucked for him. He won’t go back even if they asked and I don’t blame him, but at least he can start working on other projects and put this bitch and her abuse behind him.

I don’t think she will be working in Hollywood any time soon.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,639
17,694
113

Depp sued her in England and the English judge called him a liar and laughed him out of court. Depp appealed. The Court of Appeal laughed his ass out of court. So he once again recruited his employees and hangers-on and sued her in America. I predict that he will lose again.
I've been watching Camille Vasquez dissect Amber during cross examination and Ms. Vasquez is killing her. I will be having dirty thoughts about Ms. Vasquez for the rest of the day.



I'm on team Depp!
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
I've been watching Camille Vasquez dissect Amber during cross examination and Ms. Vasquez is killing her. I will be having dirty thoughts about Ms. Vasquez for the rest of the day.



I'm on team Depp!
She is destroying Heard and I am loving every minute of it. LOL.
 

Mr.Know-It-All

Giver of truth
Jul 26, 2020
2,072
1,399
113
Last edited:

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
81,013
107,388
113
You also predicted that Colin Kaepernick was going to play in the NFL again one day.
Heard is a fraud.
Well, if I was wrong on Kaepernick, then I have to be wrong on Heard as well. Right?

I actually don't remember making that prediction on Kaepernick. And I don't recall Kaepernick having a 120-page legal judgment calling Johnny Depp a liar and wife-beater. But aside from that, I'm sure you're 100% correct.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sonic Temple

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
81,013
107,388
113
I thought he sued the Sun. Not her. This is about her directly. The Sun posted an article they believed to be true based on AHs lies. Big difference.

She is a joke and fucking lair. I know you believe her and her pussy power but many people are finally seeing through her.
He sued the Sun and the case was about whether Heard lied about him. Different parties, same issues.
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
He sued the Sun and the case was about whether Heard lied about him. Different parties, same issues.
It is not the same issue at all. Not legally and as a lawyer you know that. The burden of proof is completely different. They are a third party and have different legal rights and defences. That is a big difference.

But at least get your facts right when stating your opinion counsellor. He didn’t sue Heard and lose in the UK. He sued the paper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soccersweeper

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
81,013
107,388
113
It is not the same issue at all. Not legally and as a lawyer you know that. The burden of proof is completely different. They are a third party and have different legal rights and defences. That is a big difference.

But at least get your facts right when stating your opinion counsellor. He didn’t sue Heard and lose in the UK. He sued the paper.
Actually the burden of proof is the same. And Heard was a witness in the UK case. She may / may not also have been a third party, but it didn't matter because The Sun straight-up won against Depp and didn't have to proceed on the third party claim. And yes, Depp sued the paper when it printed all the exact same stuff from Heard that Depp is suing Heard about now. And the evidence in the 2 cases is exactly the same, although the parties are different. And Depp got catastrophically beaten up in the UK case.

And third party defences etc weren't an issue in the UK claim because the third party claim never proceeded, even if it was filed against Heard. Because the paper won against Depp on the facts.
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Actually the burden of proof is the same. And Heard was a witness in the UK case, not a third party. And yes, Depp sued the paper when it printed all the exact same stuff from Heard that Depp is suing Heard about now. And the evidence in the 2 cases is exactly the same, although the parties are different. And Depp got catastrophically beaten up in the UK case.
1. The paper is the third party between Heard and Depp. I thought that was clear but maybe my wording was misunderstood

2. The burden of a reporter is different then the burden of the direct person defaming another. I’m not a lawyer but even I know that.

3. Hears is getting destroyed in this case. Period.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
81,013
107,388
113
1. The paper is the third party between Heard and Depp. I thought that was clear but maybe my wording was misunderstood

2. The burden of a reporter is different then the burden of the direct person defaming another. I’m not a lawyer but even I know that.

3. Hears is getting destroyed in this case. Period.
Actually the Sun was the defendant. And Depp was found to be lying in the UK case. So there was no issue of whether the reporter had special legal protections. The judge just said Depp was lying. Go read the judgment.

And a good lawyer can make pretty much anyone look bad. Depp's problem is that he gets beaten up even more badly than Heard does.
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,157
10,751
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Actually the Sun was the defendant. And Depp was found to be lying in the UK case. So there was no issue of whether the reporter had special legal protections. The judge just said Depp was lying. Go read the judgment.

And a good lawyer can make pretty much anyone look bad. Depp's problem is that he gets beaten up even more badly than Heard does.
He will win and you will have to eat crow.

Or I will. I guess we will see. I will be able to admit it but will you???? I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts