Responding to this post is the most meaningful 30 seconds spent of my lifeWhat a joke.
I thought he sued the Sun. Not her. This is about her directly. The Sun posted an article they believed to be true based on AHs lies. Big difference.
Depp sued her in England and the English judge called him a liar and laughed him out of court. Depp appealed. The Court of Appeal laughed his ass out of court. So he once again recruited his employees and hangers-on and sued her in America. I predict that he will lose again.
They can. If Depp wants. I think he just wants to prove he is not the abusive aggressor like she is lying about. He lost two major franchises and has been blacklisted in Hollywood. This would see him be able to start his career again. Those two franchises are now fucked for him. He won’t go back even if they asked and I don’t blame him, but at least he can start working on other projects and put this bitch and her abuse behind him.She doesn't even if have 50m even if she loses. What happens ? Courts put a lien on her future paychecks ?
I've been watching Camille Vasquez dissect Amber during cross examination and Ms. Vasquez is killing her. I will be having dirty thoughts about Ms. Vasquez for the rest of the day.
Depp sued her in England and the English judge called him a liar and laughed him out of court. Depp appealed. The Court of Appeal laughed his ass out of court. So he once again recruited his employees and hangers-on and sued her in America. I predict that he will lose again.
She is destroying Heard and I am loving every minute of it. LOL.I've been watching Camille Vasquez dissect Amber during cross examination and Ms. Vasquez is killing her. I will be having dirty thoughts about Ms. Vasquez for the rest of the day.
I'm on team Depp!
You also predicted that Colin Kaepernick was going to play in the NFL again one day.
Depp sued her in England and the English judge called him a liar and laughed him out of court. Depp appealed. The Court of Appeal laughed his ass out of court. So he once again recruited his employees and hangers-on and sued her in America. I predict that he will lose again.
There's no conviction in a lawsuit. She'll just lose and owe moneyLosing hope in the legal system if she doesn't get convicted.
Yep, just like how they got OJShe doesn't even if have 50m even if she loses. What happens ? Courts put a lien on her future paychecks ?
Well, if I was wrong on Kaepernick, then I have to be wrong on Heard as well. Right?You also predicted that Colin Kaepernick was going to play in the NFL again one day.
Heard is a fraud.
He sued the Sun and the case was about whether Heard lied about him. Different parties, same issues.I thought he sued the Sun. Not her. This is about her directly. The Sun posted an article they believed to be true based on AHs lies. Big difference.
She is a joke and fucking lair. I know you believe her and her pussy power but many people are finally seeing through her.
British law is very different from US law re libel/defamation. Which is why UK tabloids get away with almost anything. The Sun case was not well decided or reasoned.He sued the Sun and the case was about whether Heard lied about him. Different parties, same issues.
It is not the same issue at all. Not legally and as a lawyer you know that. The burden of proof is completely different. They are a third party and have different legal rights and defences. That is a big difference.He sued the Sun and the case was about whether Heard lied about him. Different parties, same issues.
Actually the burden of proof is the same. And Heard was a witness in the UK case. She may / may not also have been a third party, but it didn't matter because The Sun straight-up won against Depp and didn't have to proceed on the third party claim. And yes, Depp sued the paper when it printed all the exact same stuff from Heard that Depp is suing Heard about now. And the evidence in the 2 cases is exactly the same, although the parties are different. And Depp got catastrophically beaten up in the UK case.It is not the same issue at all. Not legally and as a lawyer you know that. The burden of proof is completely different. They are a third party and have different legal rights and defences. That is a big difference.
But at least get your facts right when stating your opinion counsellor. He didn’t sue Heard and lose in the UK. He sued the paper.
1. The paper is the third party between Heard and Depp. I thought that was clear but maybe my wording was misunderstoodActually the burden of proof is the same. And Heard was a witness in the UK case, not a third party. And yes, Depp sued the paper when it printed all the exact same stuff from Heard that Depp is suing Heard about now. And the evidence in the 2 cases is exactly the same, although the parties are different. And Depp got catastrophically beaten up in the UK case.
Actually the Sun was the defendant. And Depp was found to be lying in the UK case. So there was no issue of whether the reporter had special legal protections. The judge just said Depp was lying. Go read the judgment.1. The paper is the third party between Heard and Depp. I thought that was clear but maybe my wording was misunderstood
2. The burden of a reporter is different then the burden of the direct person defaming another. I’m not a lawyer but even I know that.
3. Hears is getting destroyed in this case. Period.
He will win and you will have to eat crow.Actually the Sun was the defendant. And Depp was found to be lying in the UK case. So there was no issue of whether the reporter had special legal protections. The judge just said Depp was lying. Go read the judgment.
And a good lawyer can make pretty much anyone look bad. Depp's problem is that he gets beaten up even more badly than Heard does.