Letter to Joe Biden on U.S. pause on LNG export permits

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,330
2,667
113
Ghawar
Jan 26, 2024

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500

The Honorable Jennifer Granholm
Secretary
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20585

Dear President Biden and Secretary Granholm,

We write to express deep concerns with the Department of Energy’s (DOE) review of
criteria necessary to approve permits for liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects and the disastrous pause to all pending non-FTA export permit applications. This “LNG Plan” without input from Congress could have significant economic, environmental, and national security consequences domestically and globally. It would be reckless to jeopardize our advantage, especially in a world where energy is frequently being used as a geopolitical weapon.

U.S. LNG exports have served as a vital lifeline for countries in Europe and across the globe. Nearly half of U.S. LNG exports have been delivered to Europe to date, with a significant increase in exports following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. When European imports of LNG increased by 60 percent in 2022, U.S. LNG met that demand.

Without U.S. LNG exports, European leaders would have to decide between depriving their own citizens of energy or actively funding Russia’s war on Ukraine. Moreover, in December 2023, Russia exported LNG at record levels. Russia is also in the process of dramatically expanding its future LNG export capacity.

Now, Iran-backed forces have provoked war in the Middle East and are threatening
shipping lanes through which LNG is shipped to Europe and Asia. At the same time, Iran is seeking to benefit from the war by ramping its own domestic LNG exports to displace the very supplies it helped to disrupt.

American LNG exports have enhanced our geopolitical influence and international
energy security across the board since 2016. In addition to Europe, U.S. LNG has a significant impact on energy security in Asia. Japan and South Korea have been the top two destinations for importing U.S. LNG. Taiwan also imports U.S. LNG, and India is rapidly increasing its imports as well. According to EIA, the four Asian countries accounted for one-fifth of U.S. LNG exports between January and October of 2023. Stable and secure supplies of U.S. LNG are critical to their energy security.

LNG exports from the United States are also uniquely suited to decrease global
emissions. Both China and India, two of the largest polluters globally, are top destinations for U.S. LNG exports. Efforts to limit the export of LNG from the United States thus directly undermines the ability to reduce emissions through the use of clean-burning natural gas.

Limiting U.S. LNG exports does not have any impact on the world’s demand for natural gas. Instead, countries including Russia and Iran will simply produce more energy that is subject to less stringent environmental regulations. As a result, limiting American LNG exports in the name of stopping climate change could do just the opposite and add to global emissions.

Finally, the export of U.S. LNG provides significant economic benefits across the
country. According to an ICF study, increased exports of U.S. LNG could create more than 450,000 jobs and increase GDP by $73 billion.9 Given the recent growth in the domestic LNG industry, those benefits could be even greater today and in the future.

We strongly urge you to stop this shortsighted effort. As the President of the United States and as the Secretary of Energy, you should be championing – not undermining – American LNG exports and the environmental, economic, and national security benefits to the United States and our allies.

Sincerely,
________________________
Bill Cassidy, M.D.
United States Senator

James E. Risch
United States Senator

John Barrasso
United States Senator

Steve Daines
United States Senator
...................................................
 
Last edited:

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,330
2,667
113
Ghawar
Biden is helping Russia out by putting a lid on growth of
U.S. energy export to Europe and Asia. The old fool is going
to piss off U.S. allies in Europe and Ukraine big time. Putin
will of course be pleased to no end.




I’ll Fight Back Against Biden’s LNG Pause
I plan to block every State and Energy department nominee until he relents.
.....................
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,464
2,410
113
I sometimes wish Alberta would just turn off the taps for a few weeks. This would be a great time of year. The howls from the U.S. and you know where would be heard from the moon. Probably way more effective than kneecapping their pensions.

 
Last edited:

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,330
2,667
113
Ghawar
Alberta can stop flow of natural gas to Ontario through
the Trans Canada Pipeline and Gulf oil producers can
place a ban on export of oil to eastern Canada; All on
the noble intent of helping us to combat climate change.
That should teach climate sheeple a valuable lesson on
the deadly consequence of meeting the zero emission
target set by Trudeau and Guilbeault (by 2050?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not getting younger

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,330
2,667
113
Ghawar
Putin might have had a hand in lending support to the
climate movement.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investigate Russia’s covert funding of US anti-fossil fuel groups
03/01/22

In 2014 – the same year Russia annexed Crimea – then-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen warned that Russia was covertly working to undermine European and U.S. fossil fuel production.

Three years later, in 2017, Reps. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) and Randy Weber (R-Texas) sent a lengthy letter to then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin making a similar accusation. Importantly, their letter connected some of the dots highlighting Russia’s covert efforts to fund various environmental organizations that were trying to limit or end U.S. hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for shale gas and oil.

The media and Democrats mostly shrugged their collective shoulders at these allegations. They were far too busy trying to prove the now-discredited Russian-Trump election collusion to be bothered with a more plausible Russian-environmental activist collusion.

Maybe Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will force those naysayers to reconsider the accusations and evidence and begin new investigations.

According to The Guardian, Rasmussen, who was also a former prime minister of Denmark, claimed in a presentation to a think tank in London, “I have met allies who can report that Russia, as part of their sophisticated information and disinformation operations, engaged actively with so-called non-governmental organizations (NGOs) – environmental organizations working against shale gas – to maintain European dependence on imported Russian gas.”

He declined to give details, saying only, “That is my interpretation.” NATO’s press office said the remarks were Rasmussen’s personal views, not official NATO policy.

But a NATO official did tell The Guardian, “Russia has been using a mix of hard and soft power in its attempt to recreate a sphere of influence, including through a campaign of disinformation on many issues, including energy.”

While environmental NGOs denounced Rasmussen’s claims, money can be laundered through various organizations in such a way that the final recipient (e.g., a non-profit environmental activist group) has no idea of the funding’s real origins.

And that’s where the Smith-Weber letter comes in.

The letter notes that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton complained in a speech to a private audience in 2016, “We were even up against phony environmental groups, and I’m a big environmentalist, but these were funded by the Russians …”

Smith and Weber assert that the Russian government and “complicit parties” had a scheme that “allows money originating from foreign countries like Russia to funnel through Bermuda-based shell companies to environmental groups in the United States with the aim of disrupting the U.S. energy industry.”

They alleged that “tens of millions of dollars” were handed to Bermuda-based Klein Ltd., which then funneled the money to the Sea Change
Foundation, which distributed the funds to various NGOs.

Clearly, environmental groups have had some success with their anti-fracking efforts. New York, Washington and Maryland have banned fracking. California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued and executive order last year banning fracking in the state by 2024.

As for Europe, fracking was never really embraced.

The Smith-Weber letter includes much more detail than I can here, so look at their letter for yourself. It does not establish Russian culpability, but it does provide a solid basis for further investigation — if Congress and the media are finally interested.

And they just might be. Given Russian President Vladimir Putin’s horrendous and unjustified invasion of Ukraine, there could be a lot of interest in investigating Putin’s foreign mischief.

In hindsight, it is increasingly apparent that Putin has been preparing for his Ukrainian invasion for years. Dominating the global energy market by
covertly working to limit U.S. production would have been a huge coup — in more ways than one.

Instead, over the past decade the United States became the world’s energy powerhouse, producing 11.3 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2020, compared to Russia’s 10.50 million barrels per day, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

As for natural gas, the EIA says the United States produced 33.5 trillion cubic feet in 2020, verses 22.5 trillion cubic feet for Russia.

Had Russia dominated global energy production, Putin would be in a better position to thumb his nose at countries critical of his invasion — and deprive his critics of needed oil and gas. Putin can still squeeze his critics, but the U.S. energy industry may be able to temper the impact.

If Democrats and the media are still interested in finding some type of Russian collusion, maybe they should begin by investigating whether Russia actually has been covertly funneling money to environmental NGOs.

 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts