Latest Climate alarmist claim: Humans Are Fueling Global Warming By Just Breathing, Study Claims

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,889
2,863
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing, a new study suggests.

“Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming,” according to research released last week in the UK journal PLOS.

The methane and nitrous oxide exhaled by humans make up about 0.1 of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, the writeup said.

The gases are in addition to the carbon dioxide that humans exhale.

The study, led by Dr. Nicholas Cowan from the UK Center for Ecology and Hydrology, involved 104 adult volunteers and found that nitrous oxide was breathed out by every one of them, while 31 percent exhaled methane.

Those who did not exhale methane in their breath still probably released the gas “ion flatus,” the study said, referring to burping and flatulence.


Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing: new study (nypost.com)
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,071
5,444
113
Lewiston, NY
No wonder they wouldn't let George Floyd breathe...
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,800
2,451
113
Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing, a new study suggests.

“Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming,” according to research released last week in the UK journal PLOS.

The methane and nitrous oxide exhaled by humans make up about 0.1 of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, the writeup said.

The gases are in addition to the carbon dioxide that humans exhale.

The study, led by Dr. Nicholas Cowan from the UK Center for Ecology and Hydrology, involved 104 adult volunteers and found that nitrous oxide was breathed out by every one of them, while 31 percent exhaled methane.

Those who did not exhale methane in their breath still probably released the gas “ion flatus,” the study said, referring to burping and flatulence.


Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing: new study (nypost.com)
wait until extension rebellion finds out the common knowledge about human respiration
they might start killing folks (really bad) or commit mass suicide (bad... sort of ) to reduce 'our carbon foot print
while i view all life as precious mass suicide by extension rebellion would have to be attributed to natural selection

if our breath is being blamed for causing global warming, one really has to start questioning the false narrative
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
wait until extension rebellion finds out the common knowledge about human respiration
they might start killing folks (really bad) or commit mass suicide (bad... sort of ) to reduce 'our carbon foot print
while i view all life as precious mass suicide by extension rebellion would have to be attributed to natural selection

if our breath is being blamed for causing global warming, one really has to start questioning the false narrative
I thought you ran away from all the climate change debates since you couldn't debate the science or facts.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,969
2,441
113
This is a common science fiction plotline (See season 1 of "The 100", as an example). Of course, the emergency turns out to be false, but a lot of evil ensues because of it. Life imitates art.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
This is a common science fiction plotline (See season 1 of "The 100", as an example). Of course, the emergency turns out to be false, but a lot of evil ensues because of it. Life imitates art.
You mean 'Don't Look Up'
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,800
2,451
113
I thought you ran away from all the climate change debates since you couldn't debate the science or facts.
you thought?

you thinking would be a first

you are incapable of recognizing real science or facts
that happens when you fail out of high school and/ or become an uncompromising fool ideologue
your twisted pathological need to intentionally mislead others does not help you either

you are universally trusted to be wrong and a source of comic relief, not to be taken seriously
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
you thought?

you thinking would be a first

you are incapable of recognizing real science or facts
that happens when you fail out of high school and/ or become an uncompromising fool ideologue
your twisted pathological need to intentionally mislead others does not help you either

you are universally trusted to be wrong and a source of comic relief, not to be taken seriously
That's more like it!
A spittoon of self righteous bile and anger.

It still makes me LOL every time you claim that only you can recognize 'real science'.
You have a handful of retired geologists, oil lobbyists and clowns and think that's the 'real science'.

NASA, AAAS, IPCC, Nobels, every university, every high school and pretty much every scientist who actually studies the climate knows that climate change is happening. Pretty much everyone except the 5% of science deniers can see its happening around them.

But there you are thinking only you and Anthony Watts know the truth.

Its so hilarious.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,800
2,451
113
That's more like it!
A spittoon of self righteous bile and anger.

It still makes me LOL every time you claim that only you can recognize 'real science'.
You have a handful of retired geologists, oil lobbyists and clowns and think that's the 'real science'.

NASA, AAAS, IPCC, Nobels, every university, every high school and pretty much every scientist who actually studies the climate knows that climate change is happening. Pretty much everyone except the 5% of science deniers can see its happening around them.

But there you are thinking only you and Anthony Watts know the truth.

Its so hilarious.

what is hilarious is watching you fumble your way through an attempt at sounding like you understand the science
it became glaring obvious that you do not understand fundamentals taught at the grade school or high school level

again climate change is happening. it always changes, has for billions of years and very likely will continue to change

what is not happening are the catastrophic events your propaganda claims
the same propaganda used to scare the living shit out of children

what is not hilarious but sickening is you climate alarmists are using innocent children to try and push your evil political agenda
truly repulsive and despicable behavior
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
what is hilarious is watching you fumble your way through an attempt at sounding like you understand the science
it become glaring obvious that you do not understand fundamentals taught at the grade school or high school level

again climate change is happening. it always changes, has for billions of years and very likely will continue to change

what is not happening are the catastrophic events your propaganda claims
the same propaganda used to scare the living shit out of children

what is not hilarious but sickening is you climate alarmists are using innocent children to try and push your evil political agenda
truly repulsive and despicable behavior
That's an opinion, a willfully ignorant one, but just that.
Opinion.

This is science, combining projections with updates checked against measurements.
Not opinion,.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: K Douglas

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,095
7,676
113
Room 112

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
what is hilarious is watching you fumble your way through an attempt at sounding like you understand the science
it became glaring obvious that you do not understand fundamentals taught at the grade school or high school level

again climate change is happening. it always changes, has for billions of years and very likely will continue to change

what is not happening are the catastrophic events your propaganda claims
the same propaganda used to scare the living shit out of children

what is not hilarious but sickening is you climate alarmists are using innocent children to try and push your evil political agenda
truly repulsive and despicable behavior
Hey larue.

How do explain the heat in the oceans?

 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,129
3,107
113
Hey larue.

How do explain the heat in the oceans?

282 days isn't a long enough timeframe to draw any conclusions.
I'll save you the trouble of reading this study but you can if you want to...hint...no big difference for thousands of years. You can hold off on making pasta in the boiling Atlantic for now.

Summary:
Understanding how warm intervals affected sea level in the past is vital for projecting how human activities will affect it in the future. Hoffman et al. compiled estimates of sea surface temperatures during the last interglacial period, which lasted from about 129,000 to 116,000 years ago. The global mean annual values were ∼0.5°C warmer than they were 150 years ago and indistinguishable from the 1995–2014 mean.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aai8464

p.s. you're being played.
 

whynot888

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2007
3,515
1,401
113
what is hilarious is watching you fumble your way through an attempt at sounding like you understand the science
it became glaring obvious that you do not understand fundamentals taught at the grade school or high school level

again climate change is happening. it always changes, has for billions of years and very likely will continue to change

what is not happening are the catastrophic events your propaganda claims
the same propaganda used to scare the living shit out of children

what is not hilarious but sickening is you climate alarmists are using innocent children to try and push your evil political agenda
truly repulsive and despicable behavior
A while back me and Larue got into a heated argument and disagreed on certain things, but i will give credit when its due and he is absolutely bang on with this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
282 days isn't a long enough timeframe to draw any conclusions.
I'll save you the trouble of reading this study but you can if you want to...hint...no big difference for thousands of years. You can hold off on making pasta in the boiling Atlantic for now.

Summary:
Understanding how warm intervals affected sea level in the past is vital for projecting how human activities will affect it in the future. Hoffman et al. compiled estimates of sea surface temperatures during the last interglacial period, which lasted from about 129,000 to 116,000 years ago. The global mean annual values were ∼0.5°C warmer than they were 150 years ago and indistinguishable from the 1995–2014 mean.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aai8464

p.s. you're being played.
1) how many years does that chart cover, skoob?
2) your study only points out that the heat registered in the ocean right now is higher than anything in the last 129,000 years

Do you really think you're smart enough to be in this conversation?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,129
3,107
113
1) how many years does that chart cover, skoob?
2) your study only points out that the heat registered in the ocean right now is higher than anything in the last 129,000 years

Do you really think you're smart enough to be in this conversation?
I even took the time to cut/paste the important part and you just ignore it. No wonder you are so easily sucked in by your masters.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,182
21,591
113
I even took the time to cut/paste the important part and you just ignore it. No wonder you are so easily sucked in by your masters.
Oh, you really don't understand the paper or my comment.
My bad, I didn't think you were that slow.

Carry on, how about those jays?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts