Asia Studios Massage

Kyrie Irving Boosts Antisemitic Movie Peddling ‘Jewish Slave Ships’

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,381
3,547
113



Kyrie Irving Boosts Antisemitic Movie Peddling ‘Jewish Slave Ships’
The video is based on a venomously antisemitic book which asserts that "many famous high-ranking Jews" have "admitted" to "worship[ing] Satan or Lucifer."
Jon BlisteinOctober 29, 2022

Kyrie Irving on Oct. 24, 2022. Justin Ford/Getty Imagesnone
Hours before another Brooklyn Nets loss on Thursday, noted “free-thinker” and basketball player Kyrie Irving took to Twitter to boost a movie and book, Hebrews to Negroes, stuffed with antisemitic tropes.

The 2018 film was directed by Ronald Dalton, Jr., and based upon his 2015 book of the same name. A description for the film states that it “uncovers the true identity of the Children of Israel,” while a similar one for the book reads, “Since the European and Arab slave traders stepped foot into Africa, blacks have been told lies about their heritage.” Both suggest Hebrews to Negroesespouse ideas in line with more extreme factions of the Black Hebrew Israelites, which have a long history of misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, and especially antisemitism.

The Black Hebrew Israelite movement is fairly broad, comprising organizations that (per the Anti-Defamation League) “operate semi-independently.” The movement generally coalesces around the notion that Black people are the real descendants of the ancient Israelites, with more extreme factions claiming that Black people have been “robbed of their identity as being ‘God’s chosen people'” (via the Southern Poverty Law Center).

It’s those extremist sects that have often parroted “classic” antisemitic tropes, like claiming European Jews (often referred to as the “synagogue of Satan”) wield outsized control over society, especially in industries like banking and the media. They’ve also pushed antisemitic claims that Jews are responsible for slavery and the “effeminizing of Black men.”

At one point in the purported documentary Irving shared, Dalton (who also narrates the film) brings up the “real truth about the slave trades.” He claims that, when teaching slavery, schools don’t mention the involvement of the Catholic Church, Arab, East African, or Islamic slave traders, or “the Jewish slave ships that brought our West African negro or Bantu ancestors to slave ports owned by [Jews].”

Immediately after, Dalton pivots to the mass media, calling it “the biggest tool of indoctrination, brainwashing, and propaganda that the world has seen” and adding that it’s been “helping Satan deceive the world” for centuries. To back up his claim, Dalton utilizes a fabricated quote that’s been a staple of antisemitic literature for decades. The quote — which details the supposed control Jews have over every facet of society — is attributed to Harold Rosenthal, an aide to former New York Senator Jacob Javits who was killed in a terrorist attack in Istanbul in 1976. The “quote” first appeared two years later, published in a pamphlet called The Hidden Tyranny by a man named Walter White, Jr., who appeared to make up an entire interview with Rosenthal to push this antisemitic theory.

In introducing the phony quote, Dalton pointedly describes Rosenthal as an “Ashkenazi Jew.”

Hebrews to Negroes, the book, contains even more instances of antisemitism. The book’s fourth chapter — “When Did Racism Towards Blacks Start?” — starts by falsely suggesting that anti-Black racism can be traced back to key Jewish texts. “Western Education and Religion tries to teach the world that blacks are cursed with their skin color by the Curse of Ham/Canaan. This is also taught in European Jewish documents and in the teachings of the Talmud book in Judaism. Some can say that it established the base for black racism even before the KKK.”

Another section wonders if there is “any connection” between Lucifer, Satan, Freemasonry, and Judaism and includes the claim, “Interesting enough, in earlier years, many Jews and European Scottish/York Freemasons have claimed that they worship Satan or Lucifer. Many famous high-ranking Jews and Freemasons have written books admitting to this.”

The book also quotes the infamous antisemitic hoax, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It includes a laundry list of industries — from banking to book publishing — that European Jews allegedly dominate before stating, “Using control of our money and the Mass Media, the European Jews gained control of our thinking…” Elsewhere, the book refers to the “Jewish controlled news media.”

When asked for a comment by Nets Daily, the Brooklyn Nets replied: “The Brooklyn Nets strongly condemn and have no tolerance for the promotion of any form of hate speech. We believe that in these situations, our first action must be open, honest dialogue. We thank those, including the ADL, who have been supportive during this time.”

Nets owne Joe Tsai also issued a statement Friday night on Twitter expressing that he “disappointed that Kyrie appears to support a film based on a book full of anti-semitic disinformation.” He added in a follow-up tweet, “This is bigger than basketball.”


On Saturday, Irving dropped the ultimate non-apology, claiming that him being labeled antisemitic is unjustified, even though he literally shared works that are clearly antisemitic.

“I am an OMNIST and I meant no disrespect to anyone’s religious beliefs,” Irving tweeted. “The ‘Anti-Semitic’ label that is being pushed on me is not justified and does not reflect the reality or truth I live in everyday. I embrace and want to learn from all walks of life and religions.”


The broad Black Hebrew Israelite movement, as the Southern Poverty Law Center notes, has its roots in Black Judaism, which began in the South during the late 1800s. The movement’s popularity and influence can be tied to its key tenets of “self-empowerment and economic independence,” while rhetoric “emphasizing the biblical theme of an oppressed nation being led to a promised land, informed black activist thought right up through the speeches of Martin Luther King Jr.”

The SPLC goes on to note that while the belief that Black people were descended from the ancient Israelites was always part of Black Judaism, that didn’t necessarily mean that “other people deserved condemnation or attack.” Nevertheless, the movement (like many movements) had its extremists, who paired those original messages of self-empowerment with more hateful and antisemitic rhetoric as the Black Hebrew Israelite movement evolved during the 20th century.

As for Irving, long before tweeting out Hebrews to Negroes, he appeared to tweet something in line with Black Hebrew Israelite thinking back in March 2021. The statement wasn’t overtly antisemitic, rooted more in that core notion that Black people are the real descendants of the Israelites. “You better stop playing with History,” he wrote. “You better stop lying to your people Europe and America. You better stop feeding BS to the innocent children of God. The Original people are returning, and this time God will intervene at every corner of the Earth.”

(Irving, of course, has been tied to plenty of other conspiratorial thinking over the years, from his recent anti-vaxx skepticism to his curious flat Earth comments a few years ago. At the beginning of October, Irving even shared an old video of Alex Jones railing against the so-called “New World Order.”)

Irving’s ostensible promotion of Hebrews to Negroes comes at a moment when Black Hebrew Israelite thinking, and the antisemitism espoused by its most extreme sects, have been garnering more attention thanks to Kanye West. The rapper’s recent string of comments about Jewish people has been in line with extreme Black Hebrew Israelite thinking, such as his claim that “you guys have toyed with me and tried to blackball anyone whoever opposes your agenda” and his assertion that he “actually can’t be Anti Semitic because black people are actually Jew also.”

This story was updated Oct. 29 to include Brooklyn Nets owner Joe Tsai’s statement and Kyrie Irving’s tweet.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,381
3,547
113
  • Like
Reactions: jsanchez

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,381
3,547
113
How is it antisemitic when they actually did play a part in the slave trade?

From the above article:

Mainstream scholars and Jewish leaders generally see this claim as anti-Semitic. The Anti-Defamation League, the largest Jewish defense organization, on its website includes “the false claim that Jews controlled the Atlantic slave trade” in its description of contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism.

As Yale’s Davis noted in his 1994 article, the claim is similar to numerous other historical efforts to blame Jews for a host of problems and atrocities:

“Jews, partly because of their remarkable success in a variety of hostile environments, have long been feared as the power behind otherwise inexplicable evils. For many centuries they were the only non-Christian minority in nations dedicated to the Christianization and thus the salvation of the world. Signifying an antithetical Other, individual Jews were homogenized and reified as a “race”—a race responsible for crucifying the Savior, for resisting the dissemination of God’s word, for manipulating kings and world markets, for drinking the blood of Christian children, and, in modern times, for spreading the evils of both capitalism and communistic revolution.”
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113

From the above article:

Mainstream scholars and Jewish leaders generally see this claim as anti-Semitic. The Anti-Defamation League, the largest Jewish defense organization, on its website includes “the false claim that Jews controlled the Atlantic slave trade” in its description of contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism.

As Yale’s Davis noted in his 1994 article, the claim is similar to numerous other historical efforts to blame Jews for a host of problems and atrocities:

“Jews, partly because of their remarkable success in a variety of hostile environments, have long been feared as the power behind otherwise inexplicable evils. For many centuries they were the only non-Christian minority in nations dedicated to the Christianization and thus the salvation of the world. Signifying an antithetical Other, individual Jews were homogenized and reified as a “race”—a race responsible for crucifying the Savior, for resisting the dissemination of God’s word, for manipulating kings and world markets, for drinking the blood of Christian children, and, in modern times, for spreading the evils of both capitalism and communistic revolution.”
I must be missing it. Where is it saying they did not play a part in the slave trade?
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,381
3,547
113
It didn't. Where?
I’m not finding this to be a good faith conversation. You just put up a straw man argument and have tasked me with debunking it. I could…but I won’t.

Anyway…in the unlikely event that you sincerely want to understand what is problematic about Kyrie’s post the info is thoroughly explained above. I’m not gonna waste my time trying to spoon feed a toddler who doesn’t wanna eat.

If you actually wanna discuss the article that would be cool but this convo is just dumb.

sorry
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113
I’m not finding this to be a good faith conversation. You just put up a straw man argument and have tasked me with debunking it. I could…but I won’t.

Anyway…in the unlikely event that you sincerely want to understand what is problematic about Kyrie’s post the info is thoroughly explained above. I’m not gonna waste my time trying to spoon feed a toddler who doesn’t wanna eat.

If you actually wanna discuss the article that would be cool but this convo is just dumb.

sorry
Just for record, you are posting the straw man.

It's a fact that they participated, as many other did, in the slave trade. So the new argument becomes "Jews didn't "control" the slave trade" and even worst, it's not treated as an partly true statement, It's looked as a complete lie and anti-Semitic.

That's the very definition of a straw man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mellowjello

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
Just for record, you are posting the straw man.

It's a fact that they participated, as many other did, in the slave trade. So the new argument becomes "Jews didn't "control" the slave trade" and even worst, it's not treated as an partly true statement, It's looked as a complete lie and anti-Semitic.

That's the very definition of a straw man.
Because the the point of your arguement is not to attack "slavers". Its just to attack "jews", and you're using "slavery" as the excuse to do it. It's a basic form of dog whistling. It blows my mind that people still think they being clever with this tactic,when glaringly obvious.

We don't say "the whites are pedophiles" because of the actions of some Catholic priests, right?

Rather than holding individuals to account for their actions, you have decided to use "the Jews did it"... which is of course, fucking ridiculous.

There are words we use to describe people who do that. Anti-Semitic is one of them. It applies here.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Just for record, you are posting the straw man.

It's a fact that they participated, as many other did, in the slave trade. So the new argument becomes "Jews didn't "control" the slave trade" and even worst, it's not treated as an partly true statement, It's looked as a complete lie and anti-Semitic.

That's the very definition of a straw man.
There is a fundamental difference between saying that jews partipated in the slave trade, which I do not know but it would not surprise me if they did, and saying they were responsible for it or controlled it which they shurly did not. His statement was certainly antisemtic. Why not blame christians as a group who certainly did control it.
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113
Because the the point of your arguement is not to attack "slavers". Its just to attack "jews", and you're using "slavery" as the excuse to do it. It's a basic form of dog whistling. It blows my mind that people still think they being clever with this tactic,when glaringly obvious.

We don't say "the whites are pedophiles" because of the actions of some Catholic priests, right?

Rather than holding individuals to account for their actions, you have decided to use "the Jews did it"... which is of course, fucking ridiculous.

There are words we use to describe people who do that. Anti-Semitic is one of them. It applies here.
When you say attack, what do you mean? If you participated in something, that's not an attack.

You can say he used the wrong words, that's debatable. But that's not what is happening. Everything is being labelled anti-Semitic and being wiped off the table.

Not all Catholic Priests are pedophiles, but collectively they all accept that this was done within the organization and take responsibility as a whole. The Pope has been on a world-wide foot kissing tour ever since.

And holding individuals accountable is even more fucking ridiculous. First, they died over 100 years ago so you can't prosecute them. Second, their families don't want to be prosecuted. Third, they are Jewish, the powers standing in the way now are the ones that will stand in the way if you go another direction. Fourth, most important the community approved of this. It wasn't one Jewish person participating and the community saying "Hey what you are doing is totally wrong." No, it was an accepted practice and those that could participate did, without punishment in the community.
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
When you say attack, what do you mean? If you participated in something, that's not an attack.

You can say he used the wrong words, that's debatable. But that's not what is happening. Everything is being labelled anti-Semitic and being wiped off the table.

Not all Catholic Priests are pedophiles, but collectively they all accept that this was done within the organization and take responsibility as a whole. The Pope has been on a world-wide foot kissing tour ever since.

And holding individuals accountable is even more fucking ridiculous. First, they died over 100 years ago so you can't prosecute them. Second, their families don't want to be prosecuted. Third, they are Jewish, the powers standing in the way now are the ones that will stand in the way if you go another direction. Fourth, most important the community approved of this. It wasn't one Jewish person participating and the community saying "Hey what you are doing is totally wrong." No, it was an accepted practice and those that could participate did, without punishment in the community.
You are not fooling anyone.
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113
There is a fundamental difference between saying that jews partipated in the slave trade, which I do not know but it would not surprise me if they did, and saying they were responsible for it or controlled it which they shurly did not. His statement was certainly antisemtic. Why not blame christians as a group who certainly did control it.
Because almost all Christians that participated in Slavery were white. They are already covered.

Jews don't consider themselves part of any white group. So the only way to pin them is to say it explicitly.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Because almost all Christians that participated in Slavery were white. They are already covered.

Jews don't consider themselves part of any white group. So the only way to pin them is to say it explicitly.
Nice to know. Not sure when you became the spokesperson for jews. And all these years I have considered myself white. Who knew?
 
Toronto Escorts