Kim Kardashian fails law exam for a second time
‘There are so many stressful things going on, I just have to do better in the future’
www.independent.co.uk
Kim Kardashian fails ‘baby bar’ law exam for a second time
- Thread starter Charlemagne
- Start date
www.independent.co.uk
I haven't taken a law exam in ages, I'd be curious to see what the questions are like.
The "baby bar exam" is apparently a mandatory exam that has to be taken if you are studying law at a non Bar accredited school. So students at a state U or an Ivy League school do not have to take it and are assumed to be competent to progress to 2nd year law school. I guess it is to winnow down the #'s of no-hopers and keep them away from the actual Bar exam.
Canadian law schools are all Bar accredited and therefore the "baby bar exam" does not exist up here.
So I am guessing it's a set of standard exam questions on first year contracts, torts, crim law, constitutional law etc.
Not a fan of Kim K or her spotlight craving family.Kim Kardashian fails law exam for a second time
‘There are so many stressful things going on, I just have to do better in the future’
However, I believe she is sincere about prison reform and she has had success in obtaining clemency for several inmates.
I think the world needs more lawyers like her.
Always respect someone trying to better themselves.
She said she's going to keep studying and take it again.
She said she's going to keep studying and take it again.
Now I am really curious what that would like like cold. (I'd fail, obviously, but I'd be interested in what the questions looked like. )
Normally, they're fact situations that give rise to legal issues - i.e. "Tommy Tortfeasor owns 2 rottweilers. He carefully locks the door on the dog run in his back yard, but the dogs adroitly scale the 6' link fence and accost a 4 year old child, Vance Victim. They knock VV to the ground, in their excitement and he breaks his wrist, but they are friendly and affectionate and do not attack or otherwise harm the child. Vance's parent does not promptly take Vance to emerg, but takes him to a faith healer. As a result, V's wrist becomes septic and his arm must be amputated at the elbow. Who is liable and to what extent?"
I remember that structure from my 1st amendment law tests. But I'd still be intrigued since the question was posed.
Of course, you usually have to write out not just who is liable and to what extent but your reasoning (at least that is my recollection).
Yes.
And the facts are always complex and borderline, so there are multiple possible answers, but one is more correct than the others.
Yup. I totally blew an answer because I went with the second-level correct interpretation.
I am not a Kardashian watcher but it seems to me that whatever one might think of the whole Kardashian reality saga, the fact is that Kim has had a lot going on in her life- the last I heard she was separating from Kanye because Yeezy was completely out of control and refusing to take medication for his bi-polar disorder after a failed attempt to run for POTUS; plus, she also has a young child and a crazy transgendered relative who has been making a total fool of herself running for the GOP gubernatorial nomination in California.
Meanwhile, she is trying to better herself by attending school…I can see how that would be hard with everything she has going on but she’s sticking with it and she is obviously not getting any special favours or treatment from the school. So…I wish her well and I hope she’s successful with her schooling. She obviously has plenty of money and doesn’t have to work at all if she doesn’t want to, yet she obviously wants to be able to contribute and do something with her life so good for her.
Meanwhile, she is trying to better herself by attending school…I can see how that would be hard with everything she has going on but she’s sticking with it and she is obviously not getting any special favours or treatment from the school. So…I wish her well and I hope she’s successful with her schooling. She obviously has plenty of money and doesn’t have to work at all if she doesn’t want to, yet she obviously wants to be able to contribute and do something with her life so good for her.
I heard that the Supreme courts of Canada and USA routinely requests his learned opinions.
MSM
Bill Gates/George Soros et al
Libtards
Jewish Space Lasers
All joint and severally vicariously liable.
-SchongConey, Esq.
cum laude, University of Terb 2021
Last edited:
