Dream Spa

Kansas state legislature votes to segregate gays

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
74,140
79,465
113
On Tuesday, the Kansas House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a measure designed to bring anti-gay segregation—under the guise of “religious liberty”—to the already deep-red state. The bill, written out of fear that the state may soon face an Oklahoma-style gay marriage ruling, will now easily pass the Republican Senate and be signed into law by the Republican governor. The result will mark Kansas as the first state, though certainly not the last, to legalize segregation of gay and straight people in virtually every arena of life.

If that sounds overblown, consider the bill itself. When passed, the new law will allow any individual, group, or private business to refuse to serve gay couples if “it would be contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs.” Private employers can continue to fire gay employees on account of their sexuality. Stores may deny gay couples goods and services because they are gay. Hotels can eject gay couples or deny them entry in the first place. Businesses that provide public accommodations—movie theaters, restaurants—can turn away gay couples at the door. And if a gay couple sues for discrimination, they won’t just lose; they’ll be forced to pay their opponent’s attorney’s fees. As I’ve noted before, anti-gay businesses might as well put out signs alerting gay people that their business isn’t welcome.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to barring all anti-discrimination lawsuits against private employers, the new law permits government employees to deny service to gays in the name of “religious liberty.” This is nothing new, but the sweep of Kansas’ statute is breathtaking. Any government employee is given explicit permission to discriminate against gay couples—not just county clerks and DMV employees, but literally anyone who works for the state of Kansas. If a gay couple calls the police, an officer may refuse to help them if interacting with a gay couple violates his religious principles. State hospitals can turn away gay couples at the door and deny them treatment with impunity. Gay couples can be banned from public parks, public pools, anything that operates under the aegis of the Kansas state government.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/...i_gay_segregation_bill_is_an_abomination.html

Stunned that this sort of crap is before the lawmakers even in Jesus-heartland. Surely this is grossly unconstitutional.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0

However, then we have the above.


There are really 53 (The City of Washington, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Marianas Islands etc. . . .) Democrat, Republican, Hippo or whatever Parties the only thing they do as a national organization is run a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate.
 

ig-88

New member
Oct 28, 2006
4,730
4
0
Stunned that this sort of crap is before the lawmakers even in Jesus-heartland. Surely this is grossly unconstitutional.


Constitution doesn't apply; the Civil Rights Act would, if it included sexual orientation, which it doesn't.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
74,140
79,465
113
Constitution doesn't apply; the Civil Rights Act would, if it included sexual orientation, which it doesn't.
There must be an equality before the law provision in the US Constitution!
 

ig-88

New member
Oct 28, 2006
4,730
4
0
There must be an equality before the law provision in the US Constitution!
Yes, gays have right to free speech, to bear arms, to vote, to remain silent, etc. Just about all of which would not be impinged by this legislation.

(i.e. you have no right to a driver's license)

You're right that this smells bad; but the proposed legislation seems to push the limit on what the Kansas gov can do.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,697
21
38
They want to be more like Eastern Europeans who, unfortunately, are very anti-gay.
 

Ridgeman08

50 Shades of AJ
Nov 28, 2008
4,495
2
38
This definitely falls under the "WTF are they thinking!" Column!

Seriously? Did we suddenly move BACK in time?
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Republican thinking at it's best.:crazy: This will really give the minority voters pause to think. So much for the 'melting pot' boast. Actions like this, although they are legal has to backfire at the federal level maybe not in the state, but definitely nationally.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
ox·y·mo·ron
: a combination of contradictory or incongruous words (as cruel kindness); broadly : something (as a concept) that is made up of contradictory or incongruous elements
Except for those who actually think for themselves. Can't say I've felt repressed or threatened by the religion I grew up with.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
ox·y·mo·ron
: a combination of contradictory or incongruous words (as cruel kindness); broadly : something (as a concept) that is made up of contradictory or incongruous elements
Since plenty of Gays and Lesbians are Christian not to mention generally religious, apparently it only appears oxymoronic to those who think as you do.
 
Last edited:

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Religious liberty does not mean that you get to impose your religious beliefs on society. Fuck Kansas. I've been there a few times, it's little more than toothless hillbillies and just a general shithole.
The things you say about Dorothy Gale :rolleyes:
 

kkelso

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2003
2,470
28
48
Religious liberty does not mean that you get to impose your religious beliefs on society. Fuck Kansas. I've been there a few times, it's little more than toothless hillbillies and just a general shithole.
How enlightened.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,028
3,869
113
They should just make it ok to discriminate against sinners.

That way, you can cover all the bases.

Of course, since pretty much everyone is a sinner, it would basically shut down the entire state.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts