Judge rules Colombia Hamas supporter ringleader can be deported

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,332
1,252
113
How fast can he get deported? Or do they have to wait for appeals ?


An immigration judge has ruled that Mahmoud Khalil can be deported from the United States due to his involvement in leading last year’s pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University.

Judge Jamee Comans ruled in Louisiana on Friday that Khalil, 30, can be deported, saying that the U.S. government met its burden of proof to remove him.

"I would like to quote what you said last time that there's nothing that's more important to this court than due process rights and fundamental fairness," Khalil told the court. "Clearly, what we witnessed today, neither of these principles were present today or in this whole process.

"This is exactly why the Trump administration has sent me to this court, 1,000 miles away from my family. I just hope that the urgency that you deemed fit for me are afforded to the hundreds of others who have been here without hearing for months."

Khalil's team of attorneys have until April 23 to file relief applications.

During the hearing Friday, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys also spoke about how Khalil misrepresented himself on his green card application. DHS attorneys said that Khalil was not upfront about some of the organizations he is involved with.

Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency.

Federal officials alleged that Khalil was "inadmissible at the time of his adjustment" because of "fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact" in his status application.

The agency also accused Khalil of failing to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and membership in Columbia University Apartheid Divest.

Following the ruling, Khalil's immigration attorney, Sabrine Mohamah, called the decision "unjust as it is alarming."

"This is a blatant violation of the First Amendment and a dangerous precedent for anyone who believes in free speech and political expression," she said.

"Mahmood is currently imprisoned in Louisiana, a state that detains over 7000 people daily and serves as the second-largest hub for immigration detention in the US. Louisiana's nine detention centers, eight of which are privately operated, include the only Ice facility in the country directly connected to an airport, thus streamlining mass deportations across the state."

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem also weighed in on the ruling, saying that the Columbia University graduate "hates America."

"It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America. When you advocate for violence, glorify and support terrorists that relish the killing of Americans, and harass Jews, that privilege should be revoked, and you should not be in this country," she said. "Good riddance."

On Tuesday, Comans ordered the federal government to provide evidence by Wednesday justifying its attempt to deport Khalil.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded on behalf of the government in a roughly one-and-a-half-page letter sent to the court on Wednesday. He cited a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's removal from the U.S.

The provision allows the Secretary of State to deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the U.S. "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences."

 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,332
1,252
113
You really think its good that the government deports people based on their beliefs about foreign countries?
You could burn an american flag and they wouldn't deport you.
But protest genocide in Israel?
I think its a very good idea that they deport people that come to your country, give out false information in your immigration applications and go block kids from another religion or any other group from going to school.

You take away their freedom. You're a guest in the country that accepts you, you don't like the policies go back to your country of origin if you want to create unrest.

The law has decided that this guy can be deported and if they keep doing it enough of these terrorist supporters, schools will quiet down and the children can go back to school and learn.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,636
24,376
113
I think its a very good idea that they deport people that come to your country, give out false information in your immigration applications and go block kids from another religion or any other group from going to school.

You take away their freedom. You're a guest in the country that accepts you, you don't like the policies go back to your country of origin if you want to create unrest.

The law has decided that this guy can be deported and if they keep doing it enough of these terrorist supporters, schools will quiet down and the children can go back to school and learn.
So if a liberal party came to power and decided to deport extreme right wingers and/or Islamaphobes you'd back them?
 

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
231
297
63
Using legal technicalities to suppress free speech...I honestly cannot understand how Americans still think their constitution is anything more than a scrap of paper with meaningless word scrawled on it 🤷‍♂️
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,165
2,423
113
They went a loooong way to find a Ziojudge. But also violated the rule that you need to face a judge in the jurisdiction where the alleged violation occurred. What a joke of a legal system
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,093
67,609
113
Using legal technicalities to suppress free speech...I honestly cannot understand how Americans still think their constitution is anything more than a scrap of paper with meaningless word scrawled on it 🤷‍♂️
There have always been a large swath of Americans who really hate the idea of speech rights.
 

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
231
297
63
There have always been a large swath of Americans who really hate the idea of speech rights.
What fascinates me is that it's bipartisan but for entirely different reasons. For Democrats it's all about enforcement of woke culture but for Republicans it's anything deemed 'antisemitic'
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,547
3,935
113
This means a lot from the guy that usually replies to threads with: Poorly educated or Every accusation by a Ziontologist is a confession or no fanboy or You might want to take your own advice. 😂
So if a liberal party came to power and decided to deport extreme right wingers and/or Islamaphobes you'd back them?
It’s a simple question for you to tackle. Why keep running? Too complicated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,093
67,609
113
They went a loooong way to find a Ziojudge. But also violated the rule that you need to face a judge in the jurisdiction where the alleged violation occurred. What a joke of a legal system
That ruling was in a different case, if I recall.
 
Toronto Escorts