Politically, economically, culturally, etc. Are you happy with the direction we are heading towards?
Is the world moving in the right direction?
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
Yes, it's time for change or replacement of the current hegemony.
The current global system is not designed for true cooperation, equity, or progress; instead, it largely benefits the West. In an era of increasing globalization, a new world order—rooted in unity, sustainability, technological advancement, and impartiality—could address pressing challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and geopolitical conflicts.
The existing global governance framework does not enhance international cooperation or ensure stability. Instead, it often functions as a punitive mechanism to maintain Western hegemony. Multinational institutions and diplomatic processes remain largely West-centric, fostering division rather than collaboration. A new world order, however, could shift the focus toward mutual benefit and collective progress, encouraging cooperation over competition.
Economic reforms under a new world order could also promote fairness and reduce inequality. The current system disproportionately benefits a few powerful nations, leaving many others at a disadvantage. An alternative global economy—one that prioritizes fair trade, wealth distribution, access to education, healthcare, and security—is increasingly preferred over the dominance of Western economic structures.
Moreover, a unified global approach to technological and environmental challenges would accelerate innovation and sustainability. Issues like climate change and resource depletion demand coordinated international efforts. A new world order could establish fair global policies to eliminate double standards, invest in renewable energy, and ensure responsible technological advancements that benefit all nations rather than a select few.
While the idea of a new world order may be met with skepticism, it ultimately envisions a world built on peace, equality, and progress for all. By fostering international unity and upholding fair standards for all of humanity, this new approach could create a future that serves the collective good, rather than the interests of only the most powerful.
The current hot chapter is mostly based on xenophobia - irrational fear of immigrants whereas the immigrants bring economic growth; work force support, innovation and talent and gobal connectivity.
The current global system is not designed for true cooperation, equity, or progress; instead, it largely benefits the West. In an era of increasing globalization, a new world order—rooted in unity, sustainability, technological advancement, and impartiality—could address pressing challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and geopolitical conflicts.
The existing global governance framework does not enhance international cooperation or ensure stability. Instead, it often functions as a punitive mechanism to maintain Western hegemony. Multinational institutions and diplomatic processes remain largely West-centric, fostering division rather than collaboration. A new world order, however, could shift the focus toward mutual benefit and collective progress, encouraging cooperation over competition.
Economic reforms under a new world order could also promote fairness and reduce inequality. The current system disproportionately benefits a few powerful nations, leaving many others at a disadvantage. An alternative global economy—one that prioritizes fair trade, wealth distribution, access to education, healthcare, and security—is increasingly preferred over the dominance of Western economic structures.
Moreover, a unified global approach to technological and environmental challenges would accelerate innovation and sustainability. Issues like climate change and resource depletion demand coordinated international efforts. A new world order could establish fair global policies to eliminate double standards, invest in renewable energy, and ensure responsible technological advancements that benefit all nations rather than a select few.
While the idea of a new world order may be met with skepticism, it ultimately envisions a world built on peace, equality, and progress for all. By fostering international unity and upholding fair standards for all of humanity, this new approach could create a future that serves the collective good, rather than the interests of only the most powerful.
The current hot chapter is mostly based on xenophobia - irrational fear of immigrants whereas the immigrants bring economic growth; work force support, innovation and talent and gobal connectivity.
Last edited:
Does the world in the thread title refer to mainly the collective
west that is the sum of: America, Canada, UK, Europe, Australia
and New Zealand? This part of the world comprises most of the
world's major democracies wherein leaders in general have a clear
mandate to run their countries in the right direction. Democracy
is not pefect but has been proven to be the least worse of all forms
of government. As such it seems safe to say they must be moving
in a direction near the right one.
west that is the sum of: America, Canada, UK, Europe, Australia
and New Zealand? This part of the world comprises most of the
world's major democracies wherein leaders in general have a clear
mandate to run their countries in the right direction. Democracy
is not pefect but has been proven to be the least worse of all forms
of government. As such it seems safe to say they must be moving
in a direction near the right one.
It's a pendulum. I think for real progress it's going to be needed. The present leadership and political structures are not on the people's side. They are imo further right than in the 60's when real things happened.
It's unfortunate, and people are going to suffer. But they are suffering now.
Its not an accelerationist pendulum.
According to Plinkett capital accumulates at the top and those societies collapse. The EU will do fine, but the US will collapse.
Most of the world will suffer massively when we hit 2º and higher in the next decade or so. That won't lead to a cycle, just collapse.
It is going downhill a slippery slope of fascism.
It will take a few years to come back to normalcy.
It will take a few years to come back to normalcy.
Yes.
People are tired of the woke left ideology drifting dangerously close to Marxism.
