1+What is so wrong with admitting Linux is complex? I've yet to find a physicist who'll say that String Theory is simple. Just admit it. No shame. Be proud of being able to use something that the average person finds incomprehensible.
Agreed.
1+What is so wrong with admitting Linux is complex? I've yet to find a physicist who'll say that String Theory is simple. Just admit it. No shame. Be proud of being able to use something that the average person finds incomprehensible.
I've heard of WINE , but I haven't used it. I may, in the future try it out.hiya islandman, have you tried WINE?
if not, you might want to click Menu, hop into Package Manager, click the Search icon, then in the popup window search for WINE...then Mark Wine 1.2 & Wine-Doors, maybe Wine 1.2-gecko...click apply...then you should be able to run Windows EXE programs, or even actually run program setup installers.
the few programs I like in Windows, I can actually run fine in Linux if I really want to...one if a fractal graphics program, it does very complex calculations and I was very surprised that it worked...another program generates tide prediction charts which I use when I walk to the beach to surf fish. I also miss the NotePad++ programmer's editor in Windows...I installed it, so if I really want to I can still use it to access some of it's powerful features.
these websites are great in hopes of finding Linux equivalents of the Windows-based programs:
http://linuxappfinder.com/
http://www.linuxalt.com/
cheers!
I honestly believe it is more a case of being different than complex.What is so wrong with admitting Linux is complex?
I am more interested in knowing what difficulties you encountered with linux which led to your previous comments.What is so wrong with admitting Linux is complex? I've yet to find a physicist who'll say that String Theory is simple. Just admit it. No shame. Be proud of being able to use something that the average person finds incomprehensible.
That is my one of my two gamer tags sh0rtbus or xm03_l35t3rXHave a little mercy for those of us who took the short bus to school.
Not really. When you receive a word document, edit it and save it and send it back and they say they can't read it, you're in deep doo-doo. Folks that don't know anything should stick with windows. sharper folk with special needs can use linux if applicable. and then there's mac (I was at a internet coffee shop a few days ago and had to listen to one jerk tell a lady how great mac was. how EVERYBODY who had one LUVVED it! LUVVED!!!I finished what i wanted to do using my low powered windows 7 starter netbook and left). Your hammer may be fancier but we both hit the same nail.For the average user who surfs the web and deals with standard doccuments, linux is exactly the same as anything else. Where linux gets comlicated is if you want to do more customization.
Like that never happens with Word. Most embarassingly, it happens regularly with PowerPoint. Open a PowerPoint presentation on a different computer, and it is always interesting to see what changes. Even using the same version of PowerPoint does not protect the presentation.Not really. When you receive a word document, edit it and save it and send it back and they say they can't read it, you're in deep doo-doo. Folks that don't know anything should stick with windows.





