Reverie

I'm just saying...you get a remote

twizzler2

Not Just Candy Anymore
Sep 17, 2005
734
0
0
AFP - US doctors are seeking female volunteers to test an "Orgasmatron", an implanted device that will trigger instant ecstasy, the weekly British magazine New Scientist reports.

The innovation was accidentally discovered more than two years ago, when a surgeon conducted a routine pain-relief operation on a woman.

The procedure entails inserting two electrodes into the spine and applying tiny pulses of electricity.

Patients are conscious throughout the operation so that they can say when they feel less pain.

In this case, the woman had a spontaneous orgasm, and that prompted the surgeon, pain specialist Stuart Meloy, to take the idea further.


He found that it worked so well for women who had chronic sex problems that he patented it as a possible treatment for female sexual dysfunction.

He has now received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to test a $US13,000 ($A18,150) orgasm-giving device about the size of a heart pacemaker.

In the first stage of the trial, wires connected to a battery pack are inserted through the skin and into the woman's spinal cord, a procedure that Meloy says is no riskier than having an epidural.

In the second stage, a self-contained device will be implanted beneath the skin and can be switched on and off with a remote control.

So far only one woman has completed the first stage of the trial, and another is about to be signed up. Eight more are needed.

"I thought people would be beating my door down to be part of the trial," a disappointed Meloy told New Scientist.

"But so far I am struggling to find people."

Meloy's approach has run into hostility among some sex therapists, who say sexual dysfunction in women is usually caused by psychological factors and point to "non-invasive" methods, such as a vibrator, for providing an orgasm.



©AAP 2003
 

antlerman

All about the fun!
Jun 28, 2005
1,681
1
38
this is great.....

I started to write about why this is such a bad idea....but as I wrote more I found that this could be a benifit to both sexes after all......
Why not list some funny places to install the remote for these things..........

.......... if they install the control device in the TV remote then women will never complain about us flipping through the TV channels........ooo.....aaahhh...I hate that show....aahhh eeee...i hate that show too.........mmmmmm......eeeee.......dam baby we need to get the full channel package so you have more choices.....

Or...

The red light on the hockey nets at the great hockey game.........women will want to go to every game..................
 

Stacey_luvxxx

Locita Chicita
Sep 12, 2005
445
0
0
Near you
profiles.yahoo.com
turn that dial!!!

antlerman said:
I started to write about why this is such a bad idea....but as I wrote more I found that this could be a benifit to both sexes after all......
Why not list some funny places to install the remote for these things..........

.......... if they install the control device in the TV remote then women will never complain about us flipping through the TV channels........ooo.....aaahhh...I hate that show....aahhh eeee...i hate that show too.........mmmmmm......eeeee.......dam baby we need to get the full channel package so you have more choices.....

Or...

The red light on the hockey nets at the great hockey game.........women will want to go to every game..................
oooohhhh Baby, You can flip my remote any time, you STUD!!!!!! And as for the hockey game... it would be much better to install the remote on the net that Kobe Bryant scored 81 points the other night....hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh...oooohhhhh yessssssssssssssss

LOL
 

The Lurker

All grown up. :O
Sep 7, 2005
1,982
0
0
Stacey_luvxxx said:
oooohhhh Baby, You can flip my remote any time, you STUD!!!!!! And as for the hockey game... it would be much better to install the remote on the net that Kobe Bryant scored 81 points the other night....hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh...oooohhhhh yessssssssssssssss

LOL

LOL. Hey Antlerman, at least we would be able to win an battle with Stacey with this potent tool!

"Oh so you think s.... BZZZZzzzzzzzt!" :D
 

twizzler2

Not Just Candy Anymore
Sep 17, 2005
734
0
0
it does lead to possiblities

if you had such a remote, would you hide it ?

It could virually end nagging as we know it.

"Have you taken out the Gar..." BUZZZZZZ

"Can you help weed the flower...." BUZZZZZ

people would walk through malls, airports, or just down the street pointing their remote at unsuspecting women. BUZZZZ


the possibilities are endless...
 

The Lurker

All grown up. :O
Sep 7, 2005
1,982
0
0
twizzler2 said:
if you had such a remote, would you hide it ?

It could virually end nagging as we know it.

"Have you taken out the Gar..." BUZZZZZZ

"Can you help weed the flower...." BUZZZZZ

people would walk through malls, airports, or just down the street pointing their remote at unsuspecting women. BUZZZZ


the possibilities are endless...

Ha ha I like the way you think! Finally men would get the upper hand in convos too.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts