Homosexuality...

Nature vs Nurture

  • Nature

    Votes: 53 76.8%
  • Nurture

    Votes: 16 23.2%

  • Total voters
    69
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dave in Phoenix said:
I have no idea what a homosexual lifestyle is. Being gay/straight/lesbian/bi is a natural sexual orientation. It is not a lifestyles as if someone would choose it.

I only used Christian examples since its usually Christians that are the ones spreading the lies both biblically and about somehow it being a lifestyle that one has a choice over.

On marriage - how does gays being married threaten marriage? I just bet gay marriages would last longer than straight with a 50% divorce rate.

I'm not really strong minded on if its called marriage or civil unions, clearly gay and lesbian couples should have the same legal rights that heteros have. Gays have been denied legally so many things which is why they have finially come out of the closet and are political active to demand the rights they should have just like straight couples.

The "Gay Agenda" is simply to be treated fairly and equally as the straight population.

Enough of this - I'm off to the terb party in Hamilton !
Thank you for your reply, Mr. Dave in Phoenix. Some one who engages in Homosexual behaviour and claims it to be 'natural' and 'normal' would be an individual involved in the Homosexual lifestyle. Although, an individual who engages in serial killing or is serial rapist might also claim to live a 'Killer' lifestyle, or a 'Rapist' lifestyle. Using 'Christian' examples in support of your position might very well reveal a bias in your reasoning. I'm not sure what 'lies' you're referring to, but I would point out to you that the Human anus and rectum does not function in Truth and reality as a recepticle. You are most welcome to verify this with a Medical professional, who may take you aside and quietly advise you that in Truth and reality, the anus and rectum functions to expell waste from the body. This is not a lie, Mr. Dave in Phoenix. It is the Truth, plain and simple. Another Truth for your consideration is that Homosexual intercourse produces Death, in the form of a deadly, infectious, incurable and completely preventable anal disease known as AIDS. Heterosexual intercourse produces Life, as is its Evolutionary and Biological purpose. So there you have it. One 'lifestyle' produces Death; the other 'lifestyle' produces Life. This is why intelligent, thoughtful and concerned people oppose Homosexual behaviour and the aggressive Homosexual agenda that vehemently tries to convince everyone that their culture of disease and Death is 'just the same as' and 'equal' to the Heterosexual culture of Life. In my view, adult individuals are free to make their own decisions in Life; although I think that we could all agree that some choices in Life are better then others. Sincerely, Jon .
 
You know if Great Bear and Back Burner ran this thread it could be:

THE GREAT "BEAR BACK" BURNERStory. Ouch:eek:
 
Lol...

Back Burner said:
This thread is still going on? You know what this thread needs?

A GOOD ASS FUCKING
If you have found that you are unable to offer an intelligent or otherwise worthwhile contribution to this discussion, then why not find another Thread to contribute to, Mr. Back Burner? Sincerely, Jon .
 
I have no idea why God created the anus to be so sexually pleaurable - it is full of sexual nerves and anal sex is enjoyed by many women via having a penis within or pleasurable for a hetero male by having female fingers explore. It is a fact the anus is sexually very pleasurably sensitive. I have no idea why but that is the fact.

No anal sex does not result in all the terrible death and disease or they would be lots more dead heterosexuals. Safe sex (condoms) should be used for all anal activities which makes it quite safe for both gays and heterosexuals.

It might be argued that heterosexual sex results in starvation of millions of resulting babies that die since we have overopopulated the earth and many societies can not afford to have more children. China for example had to make it a crime to have more than one child to stop the terrible overpopulation issues.

Perhaps having 10% of humans gay or lesbian is an attempt to overcome the overpopulation of so many unwanted children whose parents are unable to feed and care for.
 
Quest4Less said:
Then wouldn't the "trait" eventually be lost? I mean since it couldn't be passed on - gay couples don't have kids so how do they pass the DNA on?

Wouldn't this logically suggest that it is nurture?

Nope mutation prone genes might be responsible for this. That's why genetic disorders are still present.

Also don't forget that some guys come out after having kids.
 
mmouse said:
If it's only nature, why aren't there as many lesbians as gay men?

IS there a stat for this?

Maybe it's a sex linked trait. E.g. like colourblindness being more prevalent in men than women.
 
I really doubt it's a choice because when looking over options for MPAs and SPs I never consider going for a man. Marco @ HFH will never get my business. Sorry Marco it was a cheap joke I know you're a RMT.
 
acutus said:
With perhaps even a little effort, you might be able to offer your own opinion on the topic, Mr. Lancslad. Sincerely, Jon .


Who made you hall moniter? I have expressed my opinion, but you love to Repeat the same thing Over and Over I thought it best to let Ben Dover speak. When asked about the perils of homosexual coupling he said " Rectum, damn near killed 'em"
 
I would point out to you that the Human anus and rectum does not function in Truth and reality as a recepticle.

I'd point out to you that neither does the Female Mouth. I hope you're not getting any Unnatural Blowjobs.
 
acutus said:
If you have found that you are unable to offer an intelligent or otherwise worthwhile contribution to this discussion, then why not find another Thread to contribute to, Mr. Back Burner? Sincerely, Jon .
You really should take your own advice. Sincerely, ruck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.