http://www.cbc.ca/news/trending/ads...n-toronto-everybody-confused-1.3149776Ireland wants its expatriates to come home.
Go Home Irish
- Thread starter SkyRider
- Start date
The link will not connect.
Irish people are clannish, even when they are away from Ireland they stick together. They tend to drink and they are loud.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/24/two-irish-students-berkeley-balcony-collapse-dublin
Irish people are clannish, even when they are away from Ireland they stick together. They tend to drink and they are loud.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/24/two-irish-students-berkeley-balcony-collapse-dublin
A third generation Irishman told me that. I did not disagree with him after seeing some of his relatives from the old country.
BTW- Red never agrees with anyone unless they are in his clan.
Well you know, it's like that age old question: Who is responsible for the death of Jesus? Some blame it on the Romans, some blame it on the Jews. Personally, I blame it on the blacks. Can't say why, really, but I do. 
PS> I am second generation Irish and if these Irish stereotypes don't stop Im going to drink a lot of whiskey and Guinness and start punching people.
PS> I am second generation Irish and if these Irish stereotypes don't stop Im going to drink a lot of whiskey and Guinness and start punching people.The Irish in my family came here for a reason and though the famine is no longer an issue, I see no reason to 'return'.
I wonder if people here on this thread make the distinction between people from Northern Ireland (particularly the Ulster Protestants from there) and the people from the Republic of Ireland.
Don Rickles, the first insult comic has a nice joke about the Irish. For those of you who don't know he insults everyone in a way that has heart and equality so take this accordingly. He quipped...
"Why do we need the Irish... because they put out fires. At the scene of a fire you'll hear an Irish Fire Captain yelling "Flynn, O'Malley, Flaherty... get in there and put out that fire!!!!!" Meanwhile the Jews are sitting on the side going "Herbie, we need more wood" and the blacks are saying "Man they gonna blame us for this!""
"Why do we need the Irish... because they put out fires. At the scene of a fire you'll hear an Irish Fire Captain yelling "Flynn, O'Malley, Flaherty... get in there and put out that fire!!!!!" Meanwhile the Jews are sitting on the side going "Herbie, we need more wood" and the blacks are saying "Man they gonna blame us for this!""
These days it's probably more appropriate for the whites to be saying, "Man they are going to blame us for this". Whites are the new N@#%#@s of America.
Yeah. That sure seems to match what's happening. Oh no, there come some white guys in hoodies. Better cross the street.
Of course there are some white guys getting the blame, like the white guy who shot up that church.
At one time,virtually all the cops in NYC were Irish. It was, and still is to a large degree, a dirty dangerous job that nobody wanted to do. See the TV series "Copper".
Dylan Roof, you mean. The kid who was radicalized by Wikipedia.
Where to begin....You spend much of your day in the great outdoors, and you have observed that the sky generally looks blue. Yet in newspapers and on television the sky is always red.
You notice the discrepancy between what you know and what you are told, and since, in this episode of The Twilight Zone, you are sufficiently strong-willed not to accept an obvious falsehood, you refuse to comply with the media’s systematic mischaracterization of the sky’s true color. You also realize that something is very wrong.
My own revelation came in response to affirmative action. Various authority figures and liberal learned elders informed me that affirmative-action preferences do not really constitute racial discrimination against whites. Since I am not a moron, I knew that I was being lied to on an important subject. It is arithmetically impossible to construct a system of racial preferences that does not entail racial discrimination.
The beginning of Dylann Roof’s radicalization came, if we can trust his online manifesto, from reading the Wikipedia article on the Trayvon Martin case. “I was unable to understand,” he writes, “what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right.”
George Zimmerman’s innocence is, much like the hotness of the sun or the blueness of the sky, not a debatable proposition but a certain fact, despite diligent efforts by television reporters, with malice aforethought, to convince the public otherwise. Any accurate summary of the case, like the account that Roof found on Wikipedia, will lead a rational observer to side with Zimmerman over Martin. A jury in Florida properly came to the same conclusion.
Since Roof is not a moron, he knew that the legal system and the dominant media were jointly, with some assistance from President Obama, attempting to convict and imprison an innocent man, and he found that fact disturbing, as any moral person would.
He became even more disturbed when he discovered, through the modern miracle of a search engine, that Black-on-White crime is statistically common and White-on-Black crime comparatively rare: “I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?” Despite abundant evidence of a real pattern of Black violence against Whites, the media had elected, as part of their longstanding effort to sustain a false pattern, to publicize the death of a Black thug instead.
It is worth stressing again that none of this should be debatable. George Zimmerman was rightly exonerated on the evidence. Belief in his guilt would require either literal stupidity or a willed effort to ignore physical evidence.
And even if Zimmerman had been guilty, and even if we were able to accept the doubtful proposition that Zimmerman is a light-skinned German rather than a mixed-race Hispanic, this make-believe instance of White-on-Black violence would remain atypical. Interracial violence is, as matter of statistical fact, disproportionately Black-on-White. Anyone with an internet connection and an inclination, as Roof put it, to “type in the words ‘black on White crime’ into Google” will soon discover the truth. Pat Buchanan, relying on 2007 crime statistics, reports that “a black male was forty times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse.”
Roof’s conclusion that something is very wrong was therefore unavoidable, given his willingness to seek out evidence rather than avoid it. The crime statistics he found, on the website of the Council of Conservative Citizens and elsewhere, are true. Most violent interracial crime, as the Council reports, is Black-on-White. On this subject Roof could have avoided racialist sources and consulted instead the professional antiracist Tim Wise, who has acknowledged that “there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes.”
These facts were not invented by devious “racists” attempting to deceive the gullible; the real deceivers are those in the media and in the racial-grievance industry who deviously promote a vision of victimized Blacks routinely assaulted by hate-filled Whites. To manufacture evidence for their false vision they do not hesitate to propagandize for the imprisonment of obviously innocent men, such as George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson.
Dylann Roof’s crime in Charleston was about as contemptible as any crime could be. He not only murdered innocent people; he also murdered them, as he has apparently acknowledged, after they had welcomed him into their church and had shown him kindness and Christian fellowship. His crime merits the maximum penalty, and he will surely receive it.
Yet it is impossible, despite his terrible crime, to deny the intelligence behind the manifesto he apparently wrote, and it is impossible not to share his sense of disturbed surprise at a politicized media behemoth that so systematically and maliciously misrepresents the truth. All of Roof’s thoughts, up until the moment he decided to become a killer, were rational and insightful.
Tragically, Roof stupidly and wickedly chose to assist the mainstream media , by providing a genuine example of anti-Black racial crime in place of the false examples that they were previously forced to manufacture.
Where to begin....You spend much of your day in the great outdoors, and you have observed that the sky generally looks blue. Yet in newspapers and on television the sky is always red.
You notice the discrepancy between what you know and what you are told, and since, in this episode of The Twilight Zone, you are sufficiently strong-willed not to accept an obvious falsehood, you refuse to comply with the media’s systematic mischaracterization of the sky’s true color. You also realize that something is very wrong.
My own revelation came in response to affirmative action. Various authority figures and liberal learned elders informed me that affirmative-action preferences do not really constitute racial discrimination against whites. Since I am not a moron, I knew that I was being lied to on an important subject. It is arithmetically impossible to construct a system of racial preferences that does not entail racial discrimination.
The beginning of Dylann Roof’s radicalization came, if we can trust his online manifesto, from reading the Wikipedia article on the Trayvon Martin case. “I was unable to understand,” he writes, “what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right.”
George Zimmerman’s innocence is, much like the hotness of the sun or the blueness of the sky, not a debatable proposition but a certain fact, despite diligent efforts by television reporters, with malice aforethought, to convince the public otherwise. Any accurate summary of the case, like the account that Roof found on Wikipedia, will lead a rational observer to side with Zimmerman over Martin. A jury in Florida properly came to the same conclusion.
Since Roof is not a moron, he knew that the legal system and the dominant media were jointly, with some assistance from President Obama, attempting to convict and imprison an innocent man, and he found that fact disturbing, as any moral person would.
He became even more disturbed when he discovered, through the modern miracle of a search engine, that Black-on-White crime is statistically common and White-on-Black crime comparatively rare: “I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?” Despite abundant evidence of a real pattern of Black violence against Whites, the media had elected, as part of their longstanding effort to sustain a false pattern, to publicize the death of a Black thug instead.
It is worth stressing again that none of this should be debatable. George Zimmerman was rightly exonerated on the evidence. Belief in his guilt would require either literal stupidity or a willed effort to ignore physical evidence.
And even if Zimmerman had been guilty, and even if we were able to accept the doubtful proposition that Zimmerman is a light-skinned German rather than a mixed-race Hispanic, this make-believe instance of White-on-Black violence would remain atypical. Interracial violence is, as matter of statistical fact, disproportionately Black-on-White. Anyone with an internet connection and an inclination, as Roof put it, to “type in the words ‘black on White crime’ into Google” will soon discover the truth. Pat Buchanan, relying on 2007 crime statistics, reports that “a black male was forty times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse.”
Roof’s conclusion that something is very wrong was therefore unavoidable, given his willingness to seek out evidence rather than avoid it. The crime statistics he found, on the website of the Council of Conservative Citizens and elsewhere, are true. Most violent interracial crime, as the Council reports, is Black-on-White. On this subject Roof could have avoided racialist sources and consulted instead the professional antiracist Tim Wise, who has acknowledged that “there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes.”
These facts were not invented by devious “racists” attempting to deceive the gullible; the real deceivers are those in the media and in the racial-grievance industry who deviously promote a vision of victimized Blacks routinely assaulted by hate-filled Whites. To manufacture evidence for their false vision they do not hesitate to propagandize for the imprisonment of obviously innocent men, such as George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson.
Dylann Roof’s crime in Charleston was about as contemptible as any crime could be. He not only murdered innocent people; he also murdered them, as he has apparently acknowledged, after they had welcomed him into their church and had shown him kindness and Christian fellowship. His crime merits the maximum penalty, and he will surely receive it.
Yet it is impossible, despite his terrible crime, to deny the intelligence behind the manifesto he apparently wrote, and it is impossible not to share his sense of disturbed surprise at a politicized media behemoth that so systematically and maliciously misrepresents the truth. All of Roof’s thoughts, up until the moment he decided to become a killer, were rational and insightful.
Tragically, Roof stupidly and wickedly chose to assist the mainstream media , by providing a genuine example of anti-Black racial crime in place of the false examples that they were previously forced to manufacture.
Wow. What a wordy post to try and act like us whites are now the victim. That you also give credence to the fucked up racist views of a mass murderer is an extremely sad commentary on who you are.
Fact is that we have a huge advantage in life by being white males. Statistically we get paid more, hold the vast majority of power jobs, are less likely to get stopped by the police, and countless other benefits.
You might be upset because you haven't taken advantage of all the benefits of being a white man in Canada but that doesn't change the fact of how easier it is for us and doesn't mean you get to blame minorities.
p.s. Zimmerman deserved to be charged. He's a fucked up anger prone wannabe cop. If he did that in Canada he'd be rotting in jail and rightfully so.
Fact is that we have a huge advantage in life by being white males. Statistically we get paid more, hold the vast majority of power jobs, are less likely to get stopped by the police, and countless other benefits.
You might be upset because you haven't taken advantage of all the benefits of being a white man in Canada but that doesn't change the fact of how easier it is for us and doesn't mean you get to blame minorities.
p.s. Zimmerman deserved to be charged. He's a fucked up anger prone wannabe cop. If he did that in Canada he'd be rotting in jail and rightfully so.
"
Actually I don't blame racial minorities. They at least are intelligent enough to band together and take advantage of people like you who drink the Kool-Aid of white liberal guilt. It's ok, in the minds of those of your ilk for people like the President of the United States, for instance, to have attended a Black Nationalist church for 20 years. It's ok for Eva Longoria to belong to La Raza (the race, a Hispanic Nationalist movement) etc etc. But for a white person to say that he cares about members of his race, oh boy, does that ever upset you. Why?
Yeah, he deserves" to rot in prison for being a fucked up anger prone wannabe cop". LOL. I didn't realize that that, even if it is true, is an offence for which someone can be imprisoned.
Maybe Zimmerman shouldn't have followed Martin that night but he was Neighbourhood Watch and it was Martin who jumped HIM and hit his head repeatedly on the pavement while Zimmerman yelled for help, as all the credible eyewitness reports and the physical examination of Zimmerman proved. If it had happened here, Zimmerman wouldn't be rotting in a prison cell. He would be dead because he wouldn't have had a gun to defend himself and it would be Martin who was rotting in a prison cell for murder.
You seem ashamed to be white. People like you make me vomit. Maybe you should give up all these advantages and go to live in Nigeria or Pakistan and see how the people there treat you.
And why do we need the disenfranchised? Because someone has to still use mimeographs...
I don't think he is ashamed to be white. He recognizes truth from racist bullshit. It's also amazing how you and your ilk always finish by saying get out of the country if you want to hold an opinion different than mine. Do you understand what free speech means?
Hardly ashamed. I'm just well aware that we have it good here compared to minorities. I also don't take my frustrations out on minorities when I know they lie at my own feet.
And yes, I find it pathetic racist crap when someone feels a racists mass murderer's "intelligent manifesto" justification as "rational and insightful".
It has nothing to do with free speech. The point I believe Carvher was making was that it is whites who first started to care about other racial groups. Whites, for instance, didn't start slavery but they ended it. And then they went on to start blatantly racist anti-white programs like Affirmative Action and not report black on white crime or Hispanic on black crime. It's always white on "minority" crime that gets the headlines. Actually though, in California, where I lived for 10 years, whites ARE the minority and in LA, you sure as shit don't want to walk into a non-white neighbourhood without being armed.
So yes, try going and living in an all-black or all-Hispanic or all-Muslim neighbourhood and see how nicely they treat you. It would certainly be an eye-opener for you.
