Mirage Escorts

GM Starts Volt Buyback

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,761
114
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Government Motors at work....

GM Starts Volt Buyback

By SHARON TERLEP

General Motors Co. has arranged to buy back Chevrolet Volts from some owners who asked to return the cars amid a federal safety investigation of the car's battery, the company said on Friday.

GM Chief Executive Dan Akerson said around a half dozen owners asked to return their vehicles earlier this week and the company agreed. The auto maker also is working with other Volt owners who asked to return the battery-powered vehicles.

"We are really trying to show that we are a different company," Mr. Akerson said, adding that he and some other executives plan to personally buy the returned Volts for their own use. "We are setting a new standard for customer service."

Mark Reuss, GM's North America chief, said less than a dozen out of around 6,000 owners have asked to return their vehicles.

The buybacks came amid confusion around the company's policy regarding returns. On Friday, two Volt owners said GM had refused to buy back their vehicles. Also Friday, GM product chief Mary Barra had indicated any buybacks were not automatically approved. "As we go through a process and we think it's the right thing to do, we will make that decision," Ms. Barra said.

Volt owner Valeria Davitt, of Beaumont, Calif., said she requested a loaner vehicle from GM but when she spoke to a representative from GM, "I was told that the media had gotten it all wrong and there would not be any buybacks."

Stephen Friedman, another Volt owner, said a member of GM's "Volt Advisor Team" said in an email that media reports quoting GM CEO Dan Akerson on the buyback offer were "out of context" and the company would decide "on a case by case basis" whether a buyback was warranted.

After the rejections were presented to GM, Mr. Reuss said the executives advised employees who keep regular contact with Volt owners to do "whatever it takes" to make them happy. GM has since contacted both customers to approve a buyback, the company said.

"There are a couple of mistakes that have been made, but we all trying to do the right things," he said. "We are moving fast." He said GM's policy on returns is clear: "If someone wants us to buy back the car we're going to buy back the car."

Repurchase requests will be handled by an official within GM who has the authority to repurchase the vehicles, he said. Mr. Reuss declined to say what mechanism GM would use to determine the repurchase price.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,958
5,790
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
At least they are NOT exploding like iPhones....
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,958
5,790
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
If you listen to our GOPer friends they will tell ya DEMS and Obama caused it!....:eyebrows:
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,529
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
If you listen to our GOPer friends they will tell ya DEMS and Obama caused it!....:eyebrows:


So who pushed for the over priced battery operated death trap??


Not your GOP it was the tree hugging, people shruggin loony left.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,958
5,790
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Actually REAL scientists say it should be done ....incurious one....;)
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,761
114
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
More news...

Chevrolet Volt Battery Issues Growing, Safety Findings May Have Been Suppressed

Following on from the announcement that GM is looking at redesigning the Chevrolet Volt’s lithium-ion battery system in the wake of several highly publicized fires resulting from test crashes, comes further news that both the automaker and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration delayed disclosure of their original findings by months.

Apparently, way back in June, General Motors heard about a Volt fire that happened three weeks after said vehicle was crash tested, yet it wasn’t until November that the company, or NHTSA disclosed there was a potential problem, urging both dealers and customers to drain the battery pack immediately following an accident.

As a result the public relations nightmare surrounding Chevy’s halo vehicle appears to be deepening, though a good deal of the blame in this case also rests with NHTSA.

Joan Claybrook, a former adminstrator at NHTSA believes part of the reason for the delay was the “fragility of Volt sales.” Yet she also believes that “NHTSA could have put out a consumer alert, not to tell them [customers] for six months makes no sense to me.”

GM designed a complex cooling system for the Volt’s lithium ion battery pack to help regulate its temperature (lithium-ion units are known for overheating), yet until July it hadn’t finalized a standard proceedure to power down the battery system, the Volt had already been on sale in the US for six months at that juncture.

The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, which crash tested a Volt back in February reported no incidents of fire as resulting from the accident, yet when a second crash test was performed in August, General Motors sent a technician to power down the battery.

An interesting point on the subject been raised by Clarence Ditlow, executive director for the Center of Auto Safety in Washington D.C. He said that he is “surprised that NHTSA didn’t drain the battery after crash testing as it is standard procedure to empty the fuel tank on conventional gasoline powered vehicles.” He also says that the NHTSA incident underlines the need for “greater transparency when conducting crash tests,” as well as setting proper industry standards when it comes to new technologies.

A spokesman for GM said the company felt it didn’t need to initially disclose the issue because the original fire was an isolated occurrence and happened some time after the vehicle was crashed. “It’s kind of odd in many respects,” said Rob Peterson. “The question became: What was making this happen and what do we have to do?”

Nonetheless in wake of the findings; GM is now working with both NHTSA and the Society of Automotive Engineers to develop standards for all electric vehicles when it comes to crash testing. It’s also continuing with its program of providing concerned Volt owners with free loaner vehicles; so far 33 of roughly 5,000 customers have signed up.

[Source: Automotive News]
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,958
5,790
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
LOL!!!
Ya mean GM is acting like Toyota during the Prius debacle???....:D
 

JEFF247

New member
Feb 23, 2004
1,816
2
0
Finger Lakes, NY
www.XXXand.US
What a shocker, Government Motors lays a big stinking turd. That doesn't happen very often, unless of course you include the Post Office, Amtrak, Social Security, Education, Energy, and on and on and on. Republicans suck just as bad as Democrats. They both suck, and they've proved it over the past 20 years. Unfortunately most Americans think it's the other guys elected turd that's the problem and they keep the same old crap year after year.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
If ONLY the OIL lobbyists didn't (force?) GM to kill the electric car back in the 90s, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car? who knows how advanced GM would have been within the electric car industry.
It's inevitable that cars of the future will be electric and run on some more efficient, cleaner fuel...

.......but so long as there's oil...............$$$$
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,958
5,790
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
GM could fark BIG OIL back by mass producing vehicles run on natural gas, while at the same time Government orders plenty of CNG filling stations built. This way all that CNG planned for export, could be used to fuel NG vehicles in North America....;)
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts