http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ENG20090929&articleId=15447
Flying Pigs Saga Continued: WHO admits no deadly mutation of H1N1 Swine Flu
by F. William Engdahl
September 29, 2009
The World Health Organization, the UN agency (ir-)responsible for
declaring a Phase 6 “PANDEMIC” global alert over what it calls H1N1
Influenza A or Swine Flu, whose chief Dr Margaret Chan has repeatedly
warned that while Swine Flu to date had been rather mild, that the
emergency declaration was necessary because it “could mutate”
aggressively into a deadly pandemic killing millions, now admits well
into the flu season in the Northern Hemisphere that H1N1 has apparently
not mutated.
Margaret Chan, the head of the World Health Organization, at a meeting
with health officials in her native Hong Kong, has just stated that
the swine flu virus has not yet mutated into a more deadly strain. WHO
Director of the Initiative for Vaccine Research, Dr Marie-Paule Kieny,
reinforced that statement in a press conference September 24 in Geneva
when she stated, “we are lucky that the pandemic is moderate in severity
that most people experience a mild illness and recover spontaneously.”
That means recovery with no vaccination, no Tamiflu or other dangerous
”antiviral” drugs. Just with letting nature take its course.
Last summer, when the WHO decided to declare a global “pandemic
emergency” over what it called the H1N1 Influenza A global spread,
it also announced in a notice buried among its press releases that most
countries had stopped testing ill populations for H1N1, and that the WHO
therefore simply arbitrarily “assumed” all patients with a stated set
of symptoms were automatically H1N1 victims. So the H1N1 pandemic case
counts, to quote the WHO, “no longer reflect actual disease activity.”
The symptoms the WHO listed as indication that a patient has H1N1? A
fever, cough, sore throat, headache... in short, all the symptoms of
a common cold. The pandemic declaration by the agency entrusted by
the UN with monitoring and guarding the world’s health came anyway,
on recommendation of the WHO’s “experts,” the Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts, or SAGE.
However, even though the WHO admits it is not testing patients for H1N1
around the world, they also state that the H1N1 “pandemic virus”
is becoming more common than the common seasonal flu virus. A simple
question in the interest of accuracy: How in hell's blazes do they know
that if they stopped testing around the world? Gut feeling? WHO’s
“intuition” that everyone who has a fever, cough, headache and or
sore throat around the world automatically must have H1N1? The alarming
aspect of this entire charade is that it will likely have severe health
consequences for millions or tens of millions of some three billion
people around the world targeted to get injections of largely untested
so-called H1N1 Swine Flu vaccines.
Vaccines for South nations?
Equally bizarre is the fact that in her latest comments, the WHO’s
Chan seemed preoccupied with how to get vaccines to poorer countries
mainly in the Southern Hemisphere. Yet the same WHO Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts, SAGE, states on the WHO official website that H1N1
does not pose a major risk to the Southern Hemisphere.
The number of swine flu cases is now expected to rise as the Northern
Hemisphere moves into winter, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan says. But
she claims that the biggest challenge in combatting the pandemic would
be ensuring enough vaccines got to the world's poorest countries. Three
billion doses could be produced worldwide annually, enough to cover
almost half the world's population, Chan said.
The WHO is working to raise a billion dollars to help buy vaccines for
developing countries that cannot produce them themselves. The United
States and several other countries have stated they plan to make 10
percent of their vaccine supply available to others in need. The vehicle
to raise funds for the apparently not-threatened countries of the south is
a public-private partnership of the WHO established in 2000, called GAVI.
Tricks with WHO death data
Another little known fact about the WHO pandemic operation which gives
their dire warnings about H1N1 the necessary gravitas to scare the
dickens out of pregnant women, parents and just about anybody, are the
death statistics constantly cited when data on purported H1N1 cases are
mentioned. As of the last report at end September 2009 the WHO claimed
3917 deaths due to H1N1 Influenza A or Swine Flu.
In most cases, even the WHO and the Atlanta US Government’s CDC has
been forced to admit, deaths were in patients who already had some severe
respiratory disorder or grave illness when they contracted what was named
H1N1 Influenza A. They never to date have offered the slightest proof
that it was not those grave prior illnesses which caused death and that
the flu symptoms were merely a coincident event, what epidemiologists
term an “opportunistic infection.”
But it gets even more interesting. The WHO, it turns out, lumps its
statistics for flu deaths together with those from pneumonia, a completely
separate and far more common illness and a far larger cause of death, in
a disease classification it calls “Influenza and Pneumonia (J09-J18).”
So in 2007 the WHO recorded 21883 deaths attributed to “flu and
pneumonia” without dividing each as to direct cause. But of those
WHO classifications, flu itself only goes for symptoms in categories
J09-J11. The entire rest of the categories deal with pneumonia and
related lung infectious manifestations. Yet far and away the largest
group of deaths from infectious diseases comes from pneumonia, not from
influenza. The number of certified deaths from “influenza virus”,
with or without pneumonia complications was a far less alarming 14
persons in 2007. This clever trick allows pharmaceutical manufacturers
like GlaxoSmithKline or Baxter Labs to promote their “flu” vaccines.
If we are dealing with an illness whose symptoms in the vast majority of
cases are mild and disappear from itself with no medication after five or
more days, and whose mortality rate is at worst infinitesimally small,
there would be no need for panic, no need to line up in queues to get
jabbed with untested vaccines whose contents including various adjuvants
like aluminum hydroxide and nanoparticles are potentially nerve crippling
or even death-causing. But then that would not be “good” for Bill
Gates, David Rockefeller and other members of the Good Club, would it?
Flying Pigs Saga Continued: WHO admits no deadly mutation of H1N1 Swine Flu
by F. William Engdahl
September 29, 2009
The World Health Organization, the UN agency (ir-)responsible for
declaring a Phase 6 “PANDEMIC” global alert over what it calls H1N1
Influenza A or Swine Flu, whose chief Dr Margaret Chan has repeatedly
warned that while Swine Flu to date had been rather mild, that the
emergency declaration was necessary because it “could mutate”
aggressively into a deadly pandemic killing millions, now admits well
into the flu season in the Northern Hemisphere that H1N1 has apparently
not mutated.
Margaret Chan, the head of the World Health Organization, at a meeting
with health officials in her native Hong Kong, has just stated that
the swine flu virus has not yet mutated into a more deadly strain. WHO
Director of the Initiative for Vaccine Research, Dr Marie-Paule Kieny,
reinforced that statement in a press conference September 24 in Geneva
when she stated, “we are lucky that the pandemic is moderate in severity
that most people experience a mild illness and recover spontaneously.”
That means recovery with no vaccination, no Tamiflu or other dangerous
”antiviral” drugs. Just with letting nature take its course.
Last summer, when the WHO decided to declare a global “pandemic
emergency” over what it called the H1N1 Influenza A global spread,
it also announced in a notice buried among its press releases that most
countries had stopped testing ill populations for H1N1, and that the WHO
therefore simply arbitrarily “assumed” all patients with a stated set
of symptoms were automatically H1N1 victims. So the H1N1 pandemic case
counts, to quote the WHO, “no longer reflect actual disease activity.”
The symptoms the WHO listed as indication that a patient has H1N1? A
fever, cough, sore throat, headache... in short, all the symptoms of
a common cold. The pandemic declaration by the agency entrusted by
the UN with monitoring and guarding the world’s health came anyway,
on recommendation of the WHO’s “experts,” the Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts, or SAGE.
However, even though the WHO admits it is not testing patients for H1N1
around the world, they also state that the H1N1 “pandemic virus”
is becoming more common than the common seasonal flu virus. A simple
question in the interest of accuracy: How in hell's blazes do they know
that if they stopped testing around the world? Gut feeling? WHO’s
“intuition” that everyone who has a fever, cough, headache and or
sore throat around the world automatically must have H1N1? The alarming
aspect of this entire charade is that it will likely have severe health
consequences for millions or tens of millions of some three billion
people around the world targeted to get injections of largely untested
so-called H1N1 Swine Flu vaccines.
Vaccines for South nations?
Equally bizarre is the fact that in her latest comments, the WHO’s
Chan seemed preoccupied with how to get vaccines to poorer countries
mainly in the Southern Hemisphere. Yet the same WHO Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts, SAGE, states on the WHO official website that H1N1
does not pose a major risk to the Southern Hemisphere.
The number of swine flu cases is now expected to rise as the Northern
Hemisphere moves into winter, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan says. But
she claims that the biggest challenge in combatting the pandemic would
be ensuring enough vaccines got to the world's poorest countries. Three
billion doses could be produced worldwide annually, enough to cover
almost half the world's population, Chan said.
The WHO is working to raise a billion dollars to help buy vaccines for
developing countries that cannot produce them themselves. The United
States and several other countries have stated they plan to make 10
percent of their vaccine supply available to others in need. The vehicle
to raise funds for the apparently not-threatened countries of the south is
a public-private partnership of the WHO established in 2000, called GAVI.
Tricks with WHO death data
Another little known fact about the WHO pandemic operation which gives
their dire warnings about H1N1 the necessary gravitas to scare the
dickens out of pregnant women, parents and just about anybody, are the
death statistics constantly cited when data on purported H1N1 cases are
mentioned. As of the last report at end September 2009 the WHO claimed
3917 deaths due to H1N1 Influenza A or Swine Flu.
In most cases, even the WHO and the Atlanta US Government’s CDC has
been forced to admit, deaths were in patients who already had some severe
respiratory disorder or grave illness when they contracted what was named
H1N1 Influenza A. They never to date have offered the slightest proof
that it was not those grave prior illnesses which caused death and that
the flu symptoms were merely a coincident event, what epidemiologists
term an “opportunistic infection.”
But it gets even more interesting. The WHO, it turns out, lumps its
statistics for flu deaths together with those from pneumonia, a completely
separate and far more common illness and a far larger cause of death, in
a disease classification it calls “Influenza and Pneumonia (J09-J18).”
So in 2007 the WHO recorded 21883 deaths attributed to “flu and
pneumonia” without dividing each as to direct cause. But of those
WHO classifications, flu itself only goes for symptoms in categories
J09-J11. The entire rest of the categories deal with pneumonia and
related lung infectious manifestations. Yet far and away the largest
group of deaths from infectious diseases comes from pneumonia, not from
influenza. The number of certified deaths from “influenza virus”,
with or without pneumonia complications was a far less alarming 14
persons in 2007. This clever trick allows pharmaceutical manufacturers
like GlaxoSmithKline or Baxter Labs to promote their “flu” vaccines.
If we are dealing with an illness whose symptoms in the vast majority of
cases are mild and disappear from itself with no medication after five or
more days, and whose mortality rate is at worst infinitesimally small,
there would be no need for panic, no need to line up in queues to get
jabbed with untested vaccines whose contents including various adjuvants
like aluminum hydroxide and nanoparticles are potentially nerve crippling
or even death-causing. But then that would not be “good” for Bill
Gates, David Rockefeller and other members of the Good Club, would it?
