Florida man found guilty in parking lot shooting of unarmed black man

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Florida man found guilty in parking lot shooting of unarmed black man

Michael Drejka shot and killed Markeis McGlockton following a dispute over a handicapped-accessible spot in July 2018.

Aug. 23, 2019, 11:00 PM ET/Updated Aug. 24, 2019, 12:42 AM ET

By Janelle Griffith and Phil Helsel

A white Florida man who fatally shot an unarmed black man during a dispute over a handicapped parking space last year was found guilty of manslaughter on Friday.

Michael Drejka, who killed Markeis McGlockton at the convenience store parking lot in Clearwater, Florida, in July 2018, told detectives he fired at McGlockton because he had been pushed to the ground and feared further attack.

Drejka was remanded into custody Friday night and is scheduled to be sentenced Oct. 10. A presentencing investigation will be completed before the sentencing date.

Drejka did not testify on his own behalf. His defense attorney said Friday during closing arguments that McGlockton caused his own death by shoving Drejka and that Drejka was only protecting himself by firing his gun.

The prosecution rested its case Thursday after two days of testimony. During the trial, which was in Clearwater, the prosecution played video of Drejka's interview with Pinellas County sheriff's detectives hours after the shooting.

In this Thursday, July 19, 2018 image taken from surveillance video released by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Markeis McGlockton, far left, is shot by Michael Drejka during an altercation in the parking lot of a convenience store in Clearwater, Fla.Pinellas County Sheriff's Office via AP file

“I can safely say my family can rest now,” McGlockton’s father, Michael McGlockton, said Friday night after the verdict was delivered. “Now we can start putting the pieces back together and move on.”

Initially, the sheriff's office did not charge Drejka, who has a concealed weapons license, citing self-defense under the state's divisive "stand your ground" law. But almost a month later, prosecutors filed manslaughter charges against Drejka.

Prosecutors had argued that Drejka started the altercation by confronting McGlockton's girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, because she was parked with her children in the handicapped space. They also said Drejka had no reason to fire as McGlockton was retreating.

Jacobs, McGlockton's longtime girlfriend, testified that she feared for her safety before the argument escalated.

She said she had pulled into the handicapped parking space with McGlockton and their young children to buy snacks and drinks.

She said that as she waited for McGlockton, a man began walking around her car. She said she cracked open her window and began arguing with Drejka when he questioned why she was parked in that spot.

Security video shows Drejka confronted Jacobs in her car outside the convenience store. McGlockton, who caught wind of the argument while inside the store, came outside and pushed Drejka to the ground. Drejka pulled a handgun and fatally fired at McGlockton.

“We’re thankful that the jury got it right,” said Michele Rayner-Goolsby, an attorney who represents McGlockton’s parents. “We’re thankful that the jury saw what we saw, saw what everybody saw on that video — that a parking lot vigilante with an ax to grind murdered Markeis McGlockton in cold blood."

Drejka's defense team countered that it was Jacobs who was the aggressor, and "not once did Mr. Drejka threaten" either McGlockton or Jacobs.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/florida-man-found-guilty-parking-lot-shooting-unarmed-black-man-n1045966
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,495
92,956
113
Pretty obvious decision. Self defence has to be reasonable and proportionate. Drejka would have been justified in shooting McGlockton if the latter was attacking him and could have seriously injured him. The video CLEARLY showed that M pushed D to the ground and then took no further aggressive acts. While D was humiliated and perhaps mildly bruised and shaken up, there was no likelihood of further injury. D's defence was total 100% bullshit and he was an ass to take it to trial instead of cutting a quick plea deal.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Someone has to stand up for handicapped people and their parking spots.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
26,780
53,556
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Pretty obvious decision. Self defence has to be reasonable and proportionate. Drejka would have been justified in shooting McGlockton if the latter was attacking him and could have seriously injured him. The video CLEARLY showed that M pushed D to the ground and then took no further aggressive acts. While D was humiliated and perhaps mildly bruised and shaken up, there was no likelihood of further injury. D's defence was total 100% bullshit and he was an ass to take it to trial instead of cutting a quick plea deal.
Lets face it down south a white guy has a fairly good chance of getting off if he shoots a black during an altercation.

D defence breaks down the moment M doesn't follow up after the initial attack.

He probably didn't count on there being video evidence as well. Anyways justice was served here I feel.
 

Nathan 88

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2017
761
477
63
Someone has to stand up for handicapped people and their parking spots.
If someone truly wants to stop people from parking in a handicapped spot they should just phone the police and report it.
Shooting somebody and killing them is not the way to go about it. Now he’s going to have to do some significant jail time.
Definitely not worth it.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,495
92,956
113
Lets face it down south a white guy has a fairly good chance of getting off if he shoots a black during an altercation.

D defence breaks down the moment M doesn't follow up after the initial attack.

He probably didn't count on there being video evidence as well. Anyways justice was served here I feel.
100% agree.

BTW the old common law defence of "provocation" knocks Murder in the Second down to Manslaughter. The fact that D was shoved down on his ass is reasonably enough to make him lose his temper and mitigate the murder rap. But not enough to justify an acquittal on self defence.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
26,780
53,556
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece


BTW the old common law defence of "provocation" knocks Murder in the Second down to Manslaughter. The fact that D was shoved down on his ass is reasonably enough to make him lose his temper and mitigate the murder rap. But not enough to justify an acquittal on self defence.
Without knowing D I will wager he was looking for an opportunity to use his firearm and saw this as the right time.

It's sad that M has to lose his life and everything that he could have accomplished going forward over a parking dispute.

Hopefully the public can learn from this and act accordingly.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts