Flashback: Kamala Harris said she believed women who accused Biden of inappropriate touching

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
3,997
942
113
How things change over time LOL

'I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it'


Sen. Kamala Harris, who was announced as presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s running mate on Tuesday, once said that she believed women who accused Biden of inappropriate touching.

“I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” the California senator told reporters in April 2019.
Biden had been accused by a number of women of inappropriate touching and kissing, including by a Nevada politician who said he came up behind her at a 2014 campaign stop and kissed her on the back of her head.

“He’s going to have to make that decision for himself,” Harris said when asked if Biden, who hadn’t announced a presidential bid at the point, should still run. “I wouldn’t tell him what to do.”

Biden released a video addressing the allegations at the time, in which he said, “Social norms are changing. I understand that, and I’ve heard what these women are saying. Politics to me has always been about making connections, but I will be more mindful about respecting personal space in the future. That’s my responsibility and I will meet it.”

Nearly a year later, Biden would be accused of sexual assault by former aide Tara Reade, which is the most serious allegations he had faced and one he vehemently denied. Harris, who had by that point dropped out of the presidential race, said that Reade “has a right to tell her story.”

“And I believe that and I believe Joe Biden believes that, too,” she said on a San Francisco Chronicle podcast, before saying that “women must be able to speak without fear of retaliation.”

However, she also said that she could “only speak to the Joe Biden I know. He’s been a lifelong fighter, in terms of stopping violence against women.”
“The Joe Biden I know is somebody who really has fought for women and empowerment of women and for women’s equality and rights,” Harris said.

On that same podcast she said about her status in the veepstakes that she would be “honored to serve with Joe.”

 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
How things change over time LOL

'I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it'


Sen. Kamala Harris, who was announced as presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s running mate on Tuesday, once said that she believed women who accused Biden of inappropriate touching.

“I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” the California senator told reporters in April 2019.
Biden had been accused by a number of women of inappropriate touching and kissing, including by a Nevada politician who said he came up behind her at a 2014 campaign stop and kissed her on the back of her head.

“He’s going to have to make that decision for himself,” Harris said when asked if Biden, who hadn’t announced a presidential bid at the point, should still run. “I wouldn’t tell him what to do.”

Biden released a video addressing the allegations at the time, in which he said, “Social norms are changing. I understand that, and I’ve heard what these women are saying. Politics to me has always been about making connections, but I will be more mindful about respecting personal space in the future. That’s my responsibility and I will meet it.”

Nearly a year later, Biden would be accused of sexual assault by former aide Tara Reade, which is the most serious allegations he had faced and one he vehemently denied. Harris, who had by that point dropped out of the presidential race, said that Reade “has a right to tell her story.”

“And I believe that and I believe Joe Biden believes that, too,” she said on a San Francisco Chronicle podcast, before saying that “women must be able to speak without fear of retaliation.”

However, she also said that she could “only speak to the Joe Biden I know. He’s been a lifelong fighter, in terms of stopping violence against women.”
“The Joe Biden I know is somebody who really has fought for women and empowerment of women and for women’s equality and rights,” Harris said.

On that same podcast she said about her status in the veepstakes that she would be “honored to serve with Joe.”

Do you think she also believed Stormy and Karen and the other 25 women who accused the chosen one of rape and sexual assault?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Do you think she also believed Stormy and Karen and the other 25 women who accused the chosen one of rape and sexual assault?
Is that a "whatabout" tactic?

Don't you find it a bit amusing that she accused the person who she will now support for the presidency? You seem to gloss over that tid bit of factual information to deflect to Trump.

TDS perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEYHEY

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
Is that a "whatabout" tactic?

Don't you find it a bit amusing that she accused the person who she will now support for the presidency? You seem to gloss over that tid bit of factual information to deflect to Trump.

TDS perhaps?
LOL. So you are saying that it is OK that your fearless leader is a serial adulterer, an accused rapist, an accused sexual assaulter, an admitted pussy grabber (which by the way is assault), a defrauder with his phony school and foundation but it is a bridge too far for her to now support someone who is alleged to have done something "inappropriate"? Is that your point?

And by the way commenting or criticizing someone conduct which is deserving of comment or criticism is not hate. Your knee jerk response to criticism of your fearless leader is TDS. Why not deal with the actual comments or criticisms. Your fallback simply confirms the comment or criticism.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
LOL. So you are saying that it is OK that your fearless leader is a serial adulterer, an accused rapist, an accused sexual assaulter, an admitted pussy grabber (which by the way is assault), a defrauder with his phony school and foundation but it is a bridge too far for her to now support someone who is alleged to have done something "inappropriate"? Is that your point?

And by the way commenting or criticizing someone conduct which is deserving of comment or criticism is not hate. Your knee jerk response to criticism of your fearless leader is TDS. Why not deal with the actual comments or criticisms. Your fallback simply confirms the comment or criticism.

Your entire response is the precise definition of TDS. I couldn't have come up with a better example. Spewing a blather of accusations and biased judgements is exactly my point in response to your TDS-inspired outrage.
Thank you for that.
Now let's move on...

Part of the TDS affliction is imagining what other people say.

Where did I say anything about anything being ok with anyone being convicted of any crime? Your narrative-switching tactic is off the mark, sorry.

The point, which you clearly missed, is the irony that the person who accused Biden of being a racist and unwanted touching, will now support him as his VP.

Does that even register with you? Do you get how both funny and hypocritical that is?

Suspend your TDS for a few minutes and let that sink in.

This isn't about accusations...it's about who has made those accusations...his own VP!!!! hahahaha The Dems are fucked.
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,015
7,034
113
It's the false equivalency issue. Like saying, "bob jaywalks and bill murders, so they're both breaking the law..."
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
Your entire response is the precise definition of TDS. I couldn't have come up with a better example. Spewing a blather of accusations and biased judgements is exactly my point in response to your TDS-inspired outrage.
Thank you for that.
Now let's move on...

Part of the TDS affliction is imagining what other people say.

Where did I say anything about anything being ok with anyone being convicted of any crime? Your narrative-switching tactic is off the mark, sorry.

The point, which you clearly missed, is the irony that the person who accused Biden of being a racist and unwanted touching, will now support him as his VP.

Does that even register with you? Do you get how both funny and hypocritical that is?

Suspend your TDS for a few minutes and let that sink in.

This isn't about accusations...it's about who has made those accusations...his own VP!!!! hahahaha The Dems are fucked.
Tell me which of the things I listed is untrue?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Tell me which of the things I listed is untrue?

You are still missing the point.

Why are you focusing on accusations against Trump when this is about accusations about Biden made by the person who would be his VP?

Context, context, context.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
You are still missing the point.

Why are you focusing on accusations against Trump when this is about accusations about Biden made by the person who would be his VP?

Context, context, context.
LOL. Why do you question Kamla's ability to support Biden in the face of accusations when you support the chosen one in the face of convictions and lawsuits and sworn testimony and his own admissions. I have said that there are accusations against Biden of impropriety. That is much less egregious conduct than the convictions, judgments sworn evidence, allegations of rape, fraud etc., etc.

Your entirely predictable replies just continue to prove my point.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
Completely different context.

Graham didn't run against Trump.
Graham isn't Trump's VP.

Nice try...but another typical failure on your part trying to distract.
One of your lamer attempts to distinguish among many very lame attempts.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
One of your lamer attempts to distinguish among many very lame attempts.
One of your lame attempts to come back with an answer that has zero substance other than insults.

The typical death knell of one that has lost an argument.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,113
21,996
113
Completely different context.

Graham didn't run against Trump.
Graham isn't Trump's VP.

Nice try...but another typical failure on your part trying to distract.
Irony is beyond you, isn't it?
You failed to understand the meaning of irony.
Ironic, isn't it?
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
One of your lame attempts to come back with an answer that has zero substance other than insults.

The typical death knell of one that has lost an argument.
Do you seriously think there is a huge difference between Graham as a a GOP candidate for the nomination as POTUS and now a ranking senator who basically lives up the chosen one's ass and the now VP candidate. Are you just trying to make yourself look dumber than usual.
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,015
7,034
113
Unfortunately i think LG has some uncomfortable disclosures in his future. Oh well. Meantime let's see how all this plays out.
 
Toronto Escorts