Europe 'far from' discussing foreign troop deployment to Ukraine, Merz says

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,642
2,446
113
Ghawar
May 18, 2025

Europe is "far from" discussing foreign troop deployment to Ukraine, as efforts focus on securing an unconditional ceasefire, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on May 17, Reuters reported.

"There is no reason to talk about (troops) at the moment, we are far from that. We want the weapons to stop, the killing to end," Merz said during a joint press conference with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

His comments come amid growing interest in a potential multinational force to monitor a future peace agreement in Ukraine, even as Russian strikes continue.

A so-called "coalition of the willing" led by U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron has pushed the idea, emphasizing that a "reassurance force" would monitor an eventual ceasefire, not engage in combat with Russia.

Merz stressed that the next diplomatic step is to establish a viable framework for peace negotiations and determine potential security guarantees for Ukraine once a truce is in place.

The statement comes after peace talks held in Istanbul on May 16, which were the first direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine since 2022.

The Russian delegation — composed of lower-level aides — reiterated maximalist demands including Ukraine's neutrality, withdrawal from all annexed regions, and an end to foreign military aid.

President Volodymyr Zelensky, who had invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to participate in direct talks, condemned the absence of top Russian leadership as a signal Moscow is not serious about ending the war.

Ukraine accepted a U.S.-proposed unconditional 30-day ceasefire in March. Russia rejected it and continued its attacks, including a record-setting drone attack on May 18.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov earlier rejected the idea of deploying European peacekeepers in Ukraine.

"We cannot allow NATO's military infrastructure to get that close to our borders," Peskov told ABC News on May 11.

While U.S. President Donald Trump has ruled out sending American troops, U.S. officials have indicated Washington could support the coalition with intelligence-sharing and logistics.

European leaders continue to weigh next steps amid Moscow's intransigence and Kyiv's calls for stronger guarantees and tougher sanctions in the absence of a ceasefire.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,642
2,446
113
Ghawar
European Troops Could be Deployed to Ukraine Under Trump Proposal: Report

Apr 22, 2025

European troops could be deployed to Ukraine under a potential ceasefire deal brokered by President Donald Trump, according to report on efforts to end the bloodshed following Russia's invasion of its neighbor.

Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin and the State Department for comment by email.

Why It Matters

Russia has issued stern warnings to NATO allies who are considering sending troops to Ukraine as part of a ceasefire deal being negotiated between Washington and Moscow.

What To Know

As Trump works on securing a deal between Russia and Ukraine to bring the conflict to an end, a senior administration official told The New York Post that terms of his proposal could include deploying European forces to Ukraine.

"The hard part is what does a security force look like—we're calling that a 'resiliency force,'" the official said. "The resiliency force is part of the security guarantees that the Ukrainians want and we hope they get."

There may also be a separate peacekeeping force to monitor a potential ceasefire which could be made up of a "joint commission" of Russians, Ukrainians and a third, non-NATO country, the official said.

EU, NATO, and non-NATO allies have said they are considering sending troops to Ukraine as part of a ceasefire deal being negotiated between Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv. A "coalition of the willing" led by the U.K. and France—which so far consists of about 15 countries—has proposed deploying troops to contribute to a "reassurance force."

While the force would not enter Ukraine until after an agreement is reached, Russia has made it clear that it will not tolerate any Western military presence on Ukrainian soil. Western leaders, however, argue that such a deployment would bolster European security and help deter future Russian aggression.

The official's NYT remarks come as Trump said Sunday that he hopes Russia and Ukraine will agree to a ceasefire deal by the end of the week.

"BOTH WILL THEN START TO DO BIG BUSINESS WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WHICH IS THRIVING, AND MAKE A FORTUNE!" he said in a post on Truth Social.

Russian officials have warned Ukraine's Western allies against deploying forces to the country.

What People Are Saying

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia, said on X (formerly Twitter) on April 17: "Apparently, the top of Ukraine's fascist clique have come to Paris for talks with the U.K, Germany and France on how many European coffins they will be ready to accept after the deployment of the troops of the 'coalition of the willing' in Ukraine."

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko told Russian newspaper Izvestia in March that deploying troops to Ukraine would be "absolutely inappropriate and absurd."

"We absolutely do not care under what label NATO contingents can be deployed on the territory of Ukraine: be it the European Union, NATO, or in their national capacity. In any case, if they appear there, it means that they are deployed in a conflict zone with all the consequences for these contingents as parties to the conflict."

What Happens Next

The U.S. will be holding talks with Ukrainian and European officials in London on Wednesday to discuss a deal to halt the conflict, according to Bloomberg.

 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
29,128
1,834
113
NATO troops can never be deployed in the Ukraine/Russia war while there is still fighting and no peace agreement. To do so would mean WWIII. More of Trumps grand standing, he never had any influence in the war except for deploying obsolete American military equipment for Ukrainian military.

U.S. Troops to Begin Leaving Europe After NATO Summit Showdown!
Donald Trump appears to act primarily out of a desire for control and personal gratification, often manipulating people and global events without any clear benefit to the United States or the international community. Even if he were to withdraw American troops from Europe, it's unlikely this would reflect a genuine reduction in the U.S. military footprint, troops would likely be redeployed elsewhere. While I’m skeptical that such a withdrawal will actually occur, any major moves he makes during a second term would probably be reversed by the next administration. Ideally, by that time, Trump will be facing legal consequences for his actions.

Troops deployed in Ukraine under Trump's proposals conflict with American troops leaving Europe. The American military would have to have a staging base close by if the true intention is to deploy troops in Ukraine after peace has been established. In such an event, peace keepers would be sent by the U.N. and not unilaterally by the U.S.
 
Last edited:

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,567
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The pivot to Asia is long overdue, US has been enabling Europes under investment in defense for 8 decades. I’d believe him when he says we are drawing down.

In 2024 Europe sent more money to Russia for energy than they did to Ukraine for support.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts