Elites bankrolling group that supports climate criminals

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Dozens of wealthy American liberals fund a nonprofit organization that is a major backer of green activist groups using radical and often law-breaking tactics to draw attention to what they see as a “climate emergency.”

Founded in 2019 by Aileen Getty and Rory Kennedy, sister of Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the Climate Emergency Fund (CEF) aims to “support disruptive climate activism, because [it believes] it is the fastest way to create transformative change,” according to CEF’s website and its 2022 annual report. Its donors are a “who’s who” of wealthy liberal elites, including Hollywood writer Adam McKay, former Harvey Weinstein lawyer Lisa Bloom, “Succession” star Jeremy Strong and Hillary Clinton’s Onward Together foundation, according to CEF’s 2022 annual report.

Since its establishment, CEF has bankrolled at least 106 different activism groups, training over 30,000 activists and mobilizing an additional 1 million protesters, according to its website. CEF’s 2022 annual report states that the organization dished out over $5 million in grants to 44 grantees across 34 countries, mobilizing about 45,000 activists.


Many of these groups, including Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, engage in “direct action” protests where activists block highways, shut down airports, throw soup on priceless displays and engage in other headline-grabbing acts in order to push society towards rapidly ditching fossil fuels.

“They are trying to make normal people think that climate change is a dire emergency, but it isn’t,” Elizabeth Nickson, author of the book “Eco-Fascists,” told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Their purpose is to scare middle-class voters into voting for more regulation and suppression, which allows their very wealthy funders to buy up more land for their portfolios.”


Getty, Kennedy and McKay all sit on CEF’s board of directors, and longtime climate activist Bill McKibben serves as an advisory board member, according to the 2022 annual report. CEF promotes its aim to “provide a safe, legal, tax-deductible way to support the boldest activism,” according to its 2022 annual report.

“We fund climate activists who treat climate change like the emergency it is,” CEF Executive Director Margaret Klein Salamon said in a statement to the DCNF. “Our grants support only legal activities, and all the groups we fund are strictly non-violent. We are proud to support brave, highly effective climate activists,” she added.

Salamon previously told The New York Times that CEF exclusively funds legal activities, like training and recruitment costs. CEF grantees must confirm that they are only using the funds for legal activities, according to the NYT, but CEF did not provide specific details of that confirmation process to the DCNF.


However, law-breaking and civil disobedience are central to the missions of many of the groups CEF has funded over the years, including the U.K.-based activist group Just Stop Oil.

“The disruption has to break laws in order to get the attention of the media and to pressure the governments,” a Just Stop Oil spokesperson told the DCNF. “Time and again, we see that public disruption is necessary to spark the conversations that result in much needed political pressure.”

Members of other CEF-backed groups routinely break the law and get arrested while conducting “direct-action”-style protests. Their tactics tend to interrupt everyday life for ordinary citizens and target high-impact cultural events and locations, including professional sporting events and art museums.


Just Stop Oil exemplifies the tactics and targets selected by CEF-backed groups: their activists have disrupted the British Open golf tournament, interrupted play at the Wimbledon tennis tournament and stormed the field at a cricket match in the U.K., according to its website. Their activists have also attempted to throw soup at a van Gogh painting in a Paris museum, but authorities stopped them before they were able to launch the soup, according to Artnet.

Just Stop Oil activists are also known for blocking roads and stopping traffic during the rush hour, often to the dismay of inconvenienced motorists trying to go about their days. British authorities arrested 21 Just Stop Oil protesters who blocked rush hour traffic on July 17 around London, according to the Evening Standard.

British lawmakers passed tougher anti-protest laws in May 2023 in the wake of disruptive Just Stop Oil protests, according to the U.K. government’s website.

Under the Public Order Bill, protesters who interfere with key infrastructure, including roads and airports, could face up to a year in prison. The law also attaches a maximum six-month sentence to protesters who “lock-on” to objects or buildings, according to the U.K. government’s website.



Some British citizens are also fed up with the tactics and messaging of Just Stop Oil’s disruptive climate protests. A group of citizens calling themselves “Just Stop Pissing Everyone Off” have started to counter-protest the group as of mid-July.

The first publicized counter-protest occurred July 20, one day before a Just Stop oil road blockade in London enraged a mother trying to drive her baby to the hospital.

“The disruption will end only when the government ends all new consents and licenses for fossil fuels in the UK,” the group promised in a July 18 tweet.

“It is incredible that people would think defacing the Mona Lisa is a way to achieve progress of any kind,” Patrick Moore,a former green activist and co-founder of Greenpeace, told the DCNF. “That is sacrilege, fascism — I hate the word but it comes to mind; to them, any means is acceptable to stop the Earth’s doom, which there is no evidence for whatsoever.”


Moore left Greenpeace in the late 1980s after their tactics grew too disruptive for his liking, and he said that the new generation of climate activists is even more confrontational and scientifically errant than the activists he knew and worked with at Greenpeace.

“These days, they refuse to answer to anything that doesn’t fit their narrative,” he told the DCNF.

Extinction Rebellion is another CEF-backed group with membership in six continents, according to its website and the 2022 CEF annual report. Since 2018, the group has organized numerous road blockades, a hunger strike and a barricadeagainst Amazon distribution centers in the U.K., according to various reports by The Guardian.

“Extinction Rebellion is a cult of some sort,” Moore told the DCNF. “In certain rare situations, I think it is legitimate to do extreme things if there is a real threat. This is all phony, and they are disrupting everyday society.”


In April 2019 alone, more than 1,000 protesters were arrested in the U.K. in connection to Extinction Rebellion protests, according to the Guardian. “The symptoms of our inaction will only worsen, the longer we take to address the causes of this crisis,” the group’s website says, adding that “we are on the brink of a global catastrophe.”

“What we’re doing now is disrupting the pillars of support, disrupting the financial system, the legal system, the things that are propping up the climate change fossil fuel industry”, an Extinction Rebellion activist said in February while chained to a barricade outside a British law firm’s doors.

CEF’s philosophy posits that aggressive fringe activism on climate can shift society’s perception of climate change, drawing fresh recruits and wide exposure from the media buzz that the protest tactics generate, according to the 2022 CEF annual report. To substantiate its operation, CEF points to social research conducted by the Social Change Lab, an organization it funds and founded by a former member of Extinction Rebellion, according to the websites of Social Change Lab and CEF.

Social Change Lab essentially backs this philosophy with polling and analysis, according to the websites of Social Change Lab, CEF and the 2022 CEF annual report. But former NYT writer Andrew Revkin says he’s seen no evidence these radical protests are winning hearts and minds.


“The political contexts are different in Europe and the U.S., but most of the surveys I’ve seen here and abroad imply the general public is no fan. I’m not either,” Revkin, an environmentalist, told the DCNF. “What’s even more troubling for anyone seeking a broader base of support for clean energy and resilience is that those funding these groups aren’t interested in the general public.”

Polling in Germany, a country where CEF-backed groups are active, reflects Revkin’s assertion that many ordinary citizens do not find the disruptive tactics endearing. Public willingness to support “climate protectors” has fallen from 68% in 2021 to 34% in May 2023, according to More In Common. The share of surveyed Germans who believed that the climate movement had society’s best interests at heart fell from 60% in 2021 to 25% in May 2023.

CEF also funds the A22 Network in Europe, a coalition of green protest groups that includes Last Generation, according to the websites of CEF and A22 Network. “We are here to force governments to slash carbon emissions, nothing less,” A22 Network says of its mission, adding that “if we are refused we will disrupt, week after week, as those who came before us did many times in the struggle for human rights.”

Protesters belonging to Last Generation, which operates in Germany, glued themselves to an airport tarmac in Hamburg, Germany on July 13, resulting in dozens of flight cancellations, according to The Associated Press.


German authorities carried out nationwide organized crime raids against members of Last Generation in May, accordingto CNN.

Last Generation’s members “are tired of leaders acting like children and believe that now is the time for children to act like the leaders,” according to its homepage. “If all the youth could come together as one, nothing could stand in our way – including our elected officials, lobbying groups, and the oil & gas industry,” according to its website.

Atlanta Forest Defenders is an American group that receives money from CEF, according to CEF’s website. The group had protested construction of a police training station outside of Atlanta for several weeks in the beginning of 2023. One such protest devolved into a riot, as protesters clashed with responding police officers and set fires around the construction site on March 5, 2023.

Nearly two dozen people were charged with state domestic terrorism felonies for their involvement in the violence, according to ABC News. “We refuse to let our forest be bulldozed in favor of the police and sold out to Hollywood,” the group’s website says, despite the group’s own connections to Hollywood elites.


It is unclear whether the arrested rioters shared any direct affiliation with Atlanta Forest Defenders, but the chaos followed an Atlanta Forest Defenders event, and the group’s Twitter page still features a March 2023 reference to the group’s approval of violent resistance.

CEF also funds Scientist Rebellion, a group of climate scientists who believe “now is the time for us to take action, so that we show how seriously we take our warnings” about climate change, according to its website. Peter Kalmus, who worksat NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in southern California, is a prominent member of the group. Kalmus and others were arrested after chaining themselves to the front door of a JPMorgan Chase office in Los Angeles in April 2022.

Kalmus also protested at a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in December 2022, which resulted in his expulsion from the conference and other punitive measures, according to Science Magazine.

“Once there is scientific consensus on an issue, especially something which is about the physical laws of nature, being impartial becomes similar to putting Galileo in jail for the science of gravity,” a spokesperson for Scientist Rebellion told the DCNF. “Over the centuries to gain freedom of speech, freedom of religion, women’s vote, civil rights and all kinds of things which we think are our human rights, sick pay, the weekend… all forms of civil disobedience were used to change the power holders, why is this different?”


Climate Defiance, another CEF grantee, typically targets U.S. officials, including Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, for not doing enough to combat climate change, which the organization considers “an existential crisis that threatens every fiber of every being in every corner of the world,” according to its website.

In July, authorities arrested nine Climate Defiance protesters in the House office building after they disrupted a meeting of officials and refused to desist. “Literally f--- your petitions. The world is burning,” the group tweeted after the protest.

On several occasions, CEF-funded Australian protest group Fireproof Australia had its protesters sit in the middle of roadways to block traffic, and their protests have resulted in numerous arrests, according to Australian outlet 7News. The group describes itself as “a campaign of civil resistance proportional to the existential threat we face,” according to its website.

The group has staged several other road-blocking protests, according to The Guardian. Branches of the Australian government have introduced stricter anti-protest laws, partially in response to the antics of the group, according to the Guardian.

Advertisement - story continues below

Representatives for McKibben, Kalmus, Fireproof Australia, A22 Network, Climate Defiance, Extinction Rebellion, and Social Change Lab did not respond to requests for comment. Last Generation, Atlanta Forest Defenders, Disney, Strong, Kennedy, Getty, Bloom and Onward Together could not be reached for comment.

Elites bankrolling group that supports climate criminals (wnd.com)
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
You're ok with right wing billionaires and oil despots bankrolling science deniers and buying politicians but not ok with people who support the science?

typical trolling by franky Terb's eco hypocrite who refuse to stop using fossil fuels
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
typical trolling by franky Terb's eco hypocrite who refuse to stop using fossil fuels
Its another statement you can't respond to, isn't it?
Why would any sane person think that there is more money in climatology and activism then the oil industry and their $200 billion annual profit?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Its another statement you can't respond to, isn't it?
Why would any sane person think that there is more money in climatology and activism then the oil industry and their $200 billion annual profit?

why are you still using oil and it's products like gas?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Why can't you answer basic questions?
Why should I personally stop using fossil fuels when the issue is systematic?
Why should I make a sacrifice alone?

why don't you stop trolling when you are debunked?

why can't you read sources presented to you that disagree with you?

why should people sacrifice their use of fossil fuels when you and your climate cult religionists refuse to practice what you preach?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dvous11

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
why don't you stop trolling when you are debunked?

why can't you read sources presented to you that disagree with you?

why should people sacrifice their use of fossil fuels when you and your climate cult religionists refuse to practice what you preach?
You've never debunked anything.
I've read your sources and they are bullshit.
Every one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Last edited:

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
You've never debunked anything.
I've read your sources and they are bullshit.
Every one.




as usual you respond with more trolling and more propaganda




It's not climate change that's causing heat waves this summer but no one wants to explain why
In the 1930s, the government's Heat Wave Index was four times higher



Every summer, heat waves inevitably hit the U.S. and other parts of the world, causing climate alarmists and left-leaning media outlets to demand dramatic, disastrous changes to the global energy system. Unfortunately, this summer is no different.

On Tuesday, U.S. media outlets published a wave of stories about supposedly "historic" heat waves in Europe and North America. For example, The Washington Post published an article titled "Heat waves in U.S., Europe ‘virtually impossible’ without climate change, study finds."

Similarly, Axios published a story titled "Historic and enduring U.S. heat wave, by the numbers."

Although certain parts of the U.S. have undoubtedly experienced strong heat waves this summer, there’s no reason to believe these weather events are evidence that the world is hurtling toward a climate change catastrophe. In fact, the best available evidence suggests that heat waves recorded a century ago were more problematic than anything we’re seeing today.




Government researchers have been tracking heat waves for more than 100 years. According to data from the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, which is made available by the Environmental Protection Agency, the annual heat wave index for the contiguous 48 states was substantially higher in the 1930s than at any point in recent years. In some years in the 1930s, it was four times greater or even more.

Additionally, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has a large database of daily temperatures that goes back to 1948. NOAA used 1,066 weather stations located across the U.S. to collect this data.

According to NOAA, huge swaths of the U.S. have experienced a significant decrease in abnormally hot days recorded since 1948, especially in the Midwest and northern and eastern Texas.

Although it’s true that some parts of the U.S. have seen the number of hotter-than-usual days increase over the past 70 years — including in California and the New York metropolitan area, both of which happen to be areas where a large number of media outlets are located — most weather stations have shown no meaningful changes or even declines.

U.S. Annual Heat Wave Index, 1895–2021

U.S. Annual Heat Wave Index, 1895–2021 (EPA)
Meteorologist Anthony Watts, who works with me as a senior fellow at The Heartland Institute, analyzed NOAA’s data in detail and found that 81% of the weather stations used in NOAA’s database reported that since 1948 there has been "either a decrease or no change in the number of unusually hot days."

If the available data so clearly reveal that there is no heat-wave crisis, why are media outlets suggesting the opposite is true? The answer is sloppy, irresponsible media reporting, combined with cherry-picked data.

Anyone who wants to show a long-term warming or cooling trend can do so by selectively choosing starting and ending points in datasets that will provide the answer you’re looking for.

For instance, if you start your examination of historic temperatures with figures collected in the 1970s, when temperatures were unusually low compared to the rest of the century, then current temperatures look abnormally high.


If you start around 2010, then temperatures over the past decade appear to have dipped below "normal" and are only now recovering.

When many media outlets and left-wing politicians talk about climate change data, they almost always selectively choose a range that offers an incomplete picture of the larger available dataset. This makes it appear as though today’s temperatures are "historic" when they are actually well within normal historical ranges.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Another problem is that media outlets have been using temperature forecasts in their news reports as if those figures were actual temperature data. A forecast is, by definition, a guess, and some alarmist analysts have recently made a bad habit of incorrectly predicting insanely high temperatures that never come to fruition.

For example, the Telegraph, one of the largest papers in the U.K., published an article on July 18 in which the author claimed, "The European Space Agency said thermometers could tip 48C in Sardinia and Sicily, while the temperatures in Rome and Madrid could both reach the mid to high-40Cs. In drought-stricken Spain, temperatures were set to reach highs of 44C in Catalonia."

If the available data so clearly reveal that there is no heat-wave crisis, why are media outlets suggesting the opposite is true? The answer is sloppy, irresponsible media reporting, combined with cherry-picked data.
None of these predictions came true. In fact, some of them were off by several degrees or more.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Heat waves happen every year, but this isn’t evidence that Americans are facing a global warming crisis. When heat-wave data are put into their proper historical context, it’s clear that everything humans are experiencing today has been witnessed in the past.

The ugly truth behind climate alarmism is that much of it is driven by a radical ideological agenda that is seeking to transform the global economy and American society, not by science. The best way to fight back against it is to use cold, hard facts. And those facts plainly show that there is no reason to panic about our ever-changing climate.

It's not climate change that's causing heat waves this summer but no one wants to explain why | Fox News
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
U.S. Annual Heat Wave Index, 1895–2021 (EPA)
Meteorologist Anthony Watts, who works with me as a senior fellow at The Heartland Institute, analyzed NOAA’s data in detail and found that 81% of the weather stations used in NOAA’s database reported that since 1948 there has been "either a decrease or no change in the number of unusually hot days."
Why do you keep posting US temperatures in a debate about global temperatures.
That's bait and switch, its either incredibly stupid or intentionally dishonest.

Which is it?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,012
2,913
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Why do you keep posting US temperatures in a debate about global temperatures.
That's bait and switch, its either incredibly stupid or intentionally dishonest.

Which is it?
because heat waves are seasonal and regional. the south pacific islands were having cold air from the south in the past couple of days. something you and your cult members ignore.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,555
2,458
113
I’m going to file this under.

Only your side is evil, only my side is altruistic.
will say, the hypocrisy from the “left” is astounding. This topic is something of an example and I can point at “corporate welfare” for oil and gas. Which atleast provided a shit ton of jobs, a shit ton of growth in GDP, and money in Ottawas coffers.
/Still lookimg for all the jobs McGuinty/Wynne promised….
And these groups are little more then eco terrorist.

Typically, the right is pretty “honest” about who and what they are and don’t try to pretend to be something they aren’t. Just look at both Ford and Harper. They are who they are/were and make no bones about it.

The left is more like poisonous snakes, portraying themselves as saviours for the dirty masses, but are anything but…

And while at least in Canada, the majority are centrist, or slightly left of Center. For some reason the “left” will scream bloody murder about X, and damage typically is negligible. Not so willing to punt their side, and would rather watch the house burn down.
 
Last edited:

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,346
4,970
113
You're ok with right wing billionaires and oil despots bankrolling science deniers and buying politicians but not ok with people who support the science?
I only read the first paragraph of the OP's post.

There is a difference between bankrolling bullshit and buying politicians* and committing criminal acts and being a huge pain in the ass.

I don't care the cause, you can be advocating for feline health care, or fully funded free medical pizza for fat guys [yes it's a thing, a pizza has gotten me out of a depressive spiral more than once, not kidding, it's very distracting]
You don't fucking block traffic or create other disturbances. It's wrong when the smucks with trucks do it, it's wrong when monarchist Indians do it, it's wrong when climate activists do it. Set up a web site, put ads in the paper, hire out a townhall for a meeting and leave people the fuck alone. Hell it even bothers me when every group and their brother does parades in downtown Toronto even though it's approved, even a group I was a part of. You don't have the right to get in my face, much like my right to swing my dick ends at your face.
Anything that is illegal if I do it for shits and giggles should also be illegal when done for political protest, I mean what, oh your honour I did shoot a man in Reno but it was to make a statement about the homeless. Well you are free to go. If something is illegal, there should be a pretty solid reason for it to be so [not always but in principal]

I saw some footage of some twats sitting down and blocking traffics and some people started dragging them off the road and none too gently, one gal dragged another one pulling her by the hair. It would have gotten me rock hard if it wasn't for the staggering amounts of erectile dysfunction I have.


* They are politicians, I'm not not going to bribe them.
-Stolen from Jon Lajoie who said, she is 4 and terminally ill, I"m not not going to kick her in the face.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,346
4,970
113
and damage typically is negligible. Not so willing to punt their side, and would rather watch the house burn down.
A group of about 20 to 30 people in black attacked some places in Hess village in Hamilton including... just a second, I'm getting emotional... I can do this... come on buckle up... they attacked... a donut shop, an innocent donut shop. I gotta stop, I am verklempt just thinking about it. If anything calls for death by torture...

 
Toronto Escorts