The One Spa

East Side Hookers In Lap Of Penthouse Luxury

Girth

New member
Sep 29, 2001
200
0
0
From The New York Post:

August 11, 2002 -- A Manhattan penthouse used by a nationwide hooker service called "The Circuit" that was busted by cops last week boasted three king-size beds, mirrored walls, a four-person whirlpool bath, a sauna and two terraces with expansive views of the city.
The brothel, which cops say catered only to big-money clients who paid up to $8,000 to spend the night there, also had two safes allegedly filled with cash and drugs.

One hooker who cooperated with the probe said she made $11,000 in her first week at the penthouse, at 230 E. 30th St., "which represented her 50 percent share of her prostitution earnings," documents state.

The feds last week filed charges against 13 people they say were involved in running the elaborate prostitution ring that was based in Miami but had clients and premises in a string of cities including New York.

Among those charged were Scott Carlton, 43, and Anna Yeung, 54, who prosecutors say ran the operation's New York satellite office out of the Murray Hill penthouse.

Carlton paid $6,500-a-month rent for the digs - but easily met his monthly obligations by charging cashed-up johns $400 an hour and keeping half for himself.

Yeung was charged with cocaine trafficking and laundering sex and drug money through phony businesses named Carnival Computers, Palace Athena and Access Films, the feds charged.

About 40 members of the FBI/NYPD Joint Organized Crime Task Force, and two undercover officers, raided the penthouse on May 14 in a bust that led to last week's sweeping indictments.


Feds say the ring was headed by Judy Kreuger, 58, and Eli Tish, 70, who worked out of suites in Miami with views of Biscayne Bay. Wiretaps on telephones in the suites during 60 days last January and February revealed 90 percent of 14,000 calls monitored were prostitution-related, court documents show.

Feds say a regular customer was Coral Gables attorney Michael Murphy, who allegedly spent $111,000 on prostitutes provided by The Circuit. Murphy was charged last week with fraud for allegedly billing his clients for the services under the guise of "surveillance work."

The feds discovered The Circuit when Louisiana surgeon Dr. Howard Lippton, facing health-care-fraud charges, admitted spending $300,000 over four years at the ring's New Orleans brothel. In a plea deal, he copped an 18-month prison term for telling all he knew about the prostitution ring.

--$300,000 divided by $400 an hour equals 750 sessions over a 4year period. Now that's a player!!

:)
 

tboy

resident smartass
Aug 18, 2001
15,972
2
0
63
way out in left field
This brings to point a sore spot with me:

Why the F**k aren't these feds chasing after terrorists in the US instead of busting up something like this? I mean really, what the hell are they thinking?

If some doc or lawyer wants to spend 300 mega bones on some girls, why shouldn't he be allowed to? Isn't this just "redistribution of wealth"????

Let's make a comparison:

Let's stop some people catering to a guy with bucks who wants to get his wick dipped

or

let's stop terrorists from flying planes into buildings

BIG decision, hmmmm I know, let's let the terrorists operate and stop the john!!!! Makes perfect sense to me..... stop a "crime" where no one gets hurt, and let a crime go untouched where thousands get hurt.....
 

Quest4Less

Well-known member
May 25, 2002
1,063
27
48
Not that simple...

Unfortunately there were drugs there as well so it's not that simple.... Drugs mean crime, Murder, Robbery, Extortion etc....etc.... Not to mention the fact that drug money often ends up in the hands of terrorists to pay for the evil they do.
 

tboy

resident smartass
Aug 18, 2001
15,972
2
0
63
way out in left field
Yeah well, it does say that 90% of the 14000 phone calls were prostitution related, and while a lot of drug dealing does promote the crimes you stated above, there are a lot of drug deals that don't.

It depends on who was buying the drugs and what type they were. For instance, if it was these high rollers buying coke (which would fit this scenario) I could see this being victimless as well. Unless of course the doc was operating while under the influence or the lawyer being in court under the influence.

And the focus of the whole article and case was based on prostitution with drugs barely mentioned (imho). I could see the drug involvement being for the recreational use by the parties involved but no one knows for sure.

Needless to say, the whole thing seems like a waste of time when they are bigger more important fish to fry.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,030
3,878
113
Who knows if there were even really drugs present or not.

If there were then those running the brothel deserve what they got based on general stupidity.

If you are running that kind of show and making that kind of dough, you would think to be smart enough to implement a no drugs policy.

Then again, it might very well be that the drugs were planted by the cops.

I agree that the whole idea of chasing people in the sex industry is absurd, but that is the USA. There are states like Texas and Arkansas i believe where it is legal to sell semi automatic fire arms but illegal to sell a dildo to a woman to masturbate with.

The priorities are just all fucked up.

Don't expect it to change in your life time.

Ever watch any of those cop shows. To me that tipifies law enforcement in the good old US of A. Chasing some guy who stole a mini van at 100 mph through a residential neighbourhood and busting hookers at the end of ever show.

Give me a break.

The fact is that they don't have enough brains to catch half the terrorists out there.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Vice

The US has a serious over focus on vice crimes (drugs, prostitution) and an alarming tolerance of violence and weapons.

Most of the related crime ( IMO ) that is attributed to Vice is driven not by the vice crimes but by driving those activities under ground.

I lived for a number of years in Australia where vice activities are widely tolerated. IMO, there was much less violence around these activities than in the US.

And 300k in 4 years, that's impressive!

OTB
 

Kathy P

New member
Mar 27, 2002
491
0
0
Rosedale
www.netwave.ca
The uselessness of policing prostitution

There's a reason the cops busted this organization: it didn't require a lot of work to do it. Think about it: this bust drops in their laps via the guy in New Orleans who was cornered and willing to talk. They have a paper trail to prove the money he spent (he no doubt paid for the services on a credit card(s), they put wire taps on the telephones and send in undercover cops to pose as johns over a period of time to prove the place is regularly used for calls involving money for sexual services. Then they walk in, having tipped the media off in advance that there's a great photo opportunity and they cart everybody off to jail. They seize the contents of the penthouse and the safe and the owners will probably do penitentiary time. It's a clean bust, highly unlikely people risked getting shot at and it looks in the papers and on television like they're doing their jobs. As well, there's the status factor. Cops generally hate it when someone makes a great deal of money in crime. Look at how the cops in L.A. hated Heidi Fleiss. They hated her because she was making tons of money, living in a fabulous house, partying with the stars. One cop interviewed on Investigative Reports even said it: she was too cocky (no pun intended) and too conspicuous. The minute that you start operating at that level, you attract negative attention. The cops usually (there are always exceptions) don't bother independents if they're not attracting attention to themselves. As soon as it becomes an organization and owners are making money off of employees working for them and doing it succesfully and lucratively then there's trouble. Some think that making money as the owner of an agency or brothel is being exploitative.

As for the problems peculiar to the U.S., I agree that there is far too much attention paid to "morality-related" crimes. I attribute it to the massive influence that the far right and fundamentalist Christian influence has on politics, politicians and lawmakers. The fact that you can buy a gun in almost any state but you can't pay a lady and two consenting adults cannot spend an hour or two together in the privacy of their hotel room or home without risking being charged criminally is beyond me.

As for the terrorists, there were articles in the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail and the Sunday New York Times this weekend that said the C.I.A. is having difficulty cracking terrorist cells because 70% of the new recruits are 20-30 year old white males who don't speak Arabic, Farsi, etc. A little hard to blend into Al Queda when your name is McCormick and you have strawberry blonde hair!
 

olguy

New member
Apr 5, 2002
36
0
0
I agree that US has a hardon for drugs and escorts. Insane amount of time is wasted on some harmless people while violent offenders and sickos are allowed to do as they please.

What would happen if this was in Canada? What are the penalties for incall. I don't know if am malinformed but I rarely see incall or "brothel" busts in Toronto area. I could be wrong. Are they tolerated if kept under control? What are the legal issues and penalties for incall??
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,030
3,878
113
Re terrorists....

There was a great article in TIME magazine about Sept. 11 basically starting to do a little finger pointing.

(It's coming boys and girls, this is just the begining)

The long and short of the ariticle was that the Bush Administration was given tons of information on Al Qeda by the anti- terrorist specialists in the Clinton Administration.

These guys had been working on Bin Laden's case for years and they knew something was up. They had formulated a plan, compiled intelligence, and drawn up reports.

All of this was presented to rice, bush and even Rumsfeld (who was so obsessed with his anti-missle missle that he vetoed 600 million in anti-terrorist spending just a couple weeks before 911).

They all, however, didn't want it to look like the democrats had any brains at all and it basically got shelved by red tape and buraucracy.

The article in TIME was fascinating, and it clearly demonstrates how partisan politics in the USA helped lead to the sucess the terrorists enjoyed on 911.

I think that by the next election in 2004, there will be a whole lot of finger pointing by the democrats at the Republicans. Deserved or not.

The lasting impression i was left with after reading the article was that the arrogence of the republican party cost the american people dearly.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
typical GOP....

james t kirk said:
Re terrorists....



The lasting impression i was left with after reading the article was that the arrogence of the republican party cost the american people dearly.

Unfortunate but true. The one thing the republican party knows how to do well is, ...."fill body bags" when in control of the White House.
They don`t have a clue about the economy, but they know all about war. Note how bush is just itching to go back into Iraq to "fix" the mess his daddy left.
This will help divert attention from his non-existent domestic policy....
 
Last edited:

Kathy P

New member
Mar 27, 2002
491
0
0
Rosedale
www.netwave.ca
It's the marketing/packaging

I agree with you, tbill, although it depends who you deal with. Some agencies are particular although one I worked for in Toronto a few years ago used to send a woman out that looked like she was in a coma she was so stoned. Strangely enough she was really in demand. Go figure. I read somewhere that the Mayflower Madam ran an agency with really strict rules. Ladies had to shop at stores she had picked for quality, could not wear high heels higher than 3.5 inches, that stockings, garter, thong and bra all had to match, all ladies had to have regular manicures and pedicures and were weighed in every time they came to work. If they gained even a pound, they were booked off for the night! The other rule she had was that her ladies had to shave their legs every day. Makes me chuckle to realize I am not that obsessive compulsive after all (I shave my legs every day)!
 

tboy

resident smartass
Aug 18, 2001
15,972
2
0
63
way out in left field
The Mayflower Madam? Sheesh, I guess the pilgrims weren't so puritan afterall!! lol

I think it was Kathy P and James T that said the US is was messed up over morality crimes. I coudn't agree more. I mean look at their broadcast television programs, no swearing (of any kind) no nudity, no sex....I mean, it takes networks like HBO to bring reality to the screen.

Let's just hope our politicians don't get caught up in the old "its worse to F**k someone than kill them" attitude.
 

Kathy P

New member
Mar 27, 2002
491
0
0
Rosedale
www.netwave.ca
East Side Hookers...

You're right when you talk about the U.S. being so morally uptight. Where do you think George Carlin get 95% of his material? I read somewhere that when the actors from The Sopranos came up to Toronto last year to shoot the commercials for CTV that they were amazed that the show was being shown on regular programming. Michael Imperioli, the actor who plays Christopher Moltisanti, and who also writes the occasional episode was quoted as saying, "Alright, Canada! You can't even say the word "shit" on American television nevermind showing people fucking....."
 

mrpolarbear

New member
Sep 10, 2001
1,094
0
0
69
chicago
Hey on south park they said shit 162 times in one episode last year. the had a running score at the bottom of the screen.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts