In The Record, Thurs. Dec 9, pg. B1:
"A Kitchener woman who had sexual intercourse with her two sons was herself a victim of abuse, a judge said yesterday in sentencing her to house arrest rather than jail... The woman... is a struggling alcoholic. Both incidents happened after the mother gave her sons alcohol."
There is no mention in the article of the age of the boys.
Can you imagine the outrage if it was a drunk father who plied his daughters with alcohol and then had sex with them? He'd be off to Kingston faster than you could say incest, and rightly so.
Where's the outrage?
"A Kitchener woman who had sexual intercourse with her two sons was herself a victim of abuse, a judge said yesterday in sentencing her to house arrest rather than jail... The woman... is a struggling alcoholic. Both incidents happened after the mother gave her sons alcohol."
There is no mention in the article of the age of the boys.
Can you imagine the outrage if it was a drunk father who plied his daughters with alcohol and then had sex with them? He'd be off to Kingston faster than you could say incest, and rightly so.
Where's the outrage?