Desiree or Roxanne Review??
- Thread starter bigmontydog
- Start date
We have a no review policy now .
...we will be posting it on the new website about our NRP...
Thank you
So please respect this ...i know some are saying its not on the site therefore its ok but please understand theres still glitches and errors we are working on to keep it up to date ...it remains the same even for our Ottawa trip .
...we will be posting it on the new website about our NRP...
Thank you
So please respect this ...i know some are saying its not on the site therefore its ok but please understand theres still glitches and errors we are working on to keep it up to date ...it remains the same even for our Ottawa trip .
I agree.
A NRP for an entire agency is the dumbest idea I've heard in a while. With vetran indy's that have an established client base I understand the reason behind it.
For an agency to implement a NRP is basically saying we offer shitty service and shitty girls but don't want anyone to write about them and let the secret out of the bag.
What's wrong with a review confirming what the webstie says the girls will offer and look like.
At least this makes my decision easier - from now on I will just book through Night Candy and Naughty Hotties.
A NRP for an entire agency is the dumbest idea I've heard in a while. With vetran indy's that have an established client base I understand the reason behind it.
For an agency to implement a NRP is basically saying we offer shitty service and shitty girls but don't want anyone to write about them and let the secret out of the bag.
What's wrong with a review confirming what the webstie says the girls will offer and look like.
At least this makes my decision easier - from now on I will just book through Night Candy and Naughty Hotties.
wantoplay said:
Felicity has retired (the pic was taken off awhile ago PM me !!! theres good news though )
All we are doing is respecting the ladies requests since most are popular enough in there own personal and business life Some have real 9- 5 jobs in high profile places etc.. etc... .It truly amazes me how men review in such extra extra DETAIL in Barrie ...I'm starting to think these careless unedited reviews are harming Barries industry ...there used to be lots of reviews of mps and them bamo everyones shut down ...The reviews around here could be done with better taste ........some around here egagerate reviews for the wrong kind of attention ...hence a reason its more discreet for the gentleman and the escort
........i can see why some would want the juice around here !
i appreciate your opinion and im truly sorry you feel that way ...noones special in this industry but we do have choices ..if you can respect that
So if you think we have something to hide by no reviews ...it truly won't effect many others in Barrie every single picture is right off the disc truth be known the ladies look better then there pics most are real low profile models..other models choose to not even be on hot spicy website thats how discreet some of these ladies are ..
I see both sides as right .
I don't see what any of those reason's have to do with having a NRP.Spanglerdoo said:
We are not asking for their mailing address, where they work, and a full face shot. All reviewing does is enable various members to share their experiences and compare notes.
By doing this we eliminate the potential for dissapointment and increase the chances of a great experiencen for both the lady and ourselves.
At 200-300 an hour these days I think that most of the guys on here would agree - its nice to know what to expect before you go in to drop that kind of coin.
-
I don't think guys get anything the same as the last guy
Infact I totally believe that every escort is YMMV with most clients
How can you tell me that because guy #1 had a ****** that guy #2 is garanteed.what he had .....guy #2 thinks hes entitled cause why he read a review ? ?????
Theres no garantee in this businesss even with REVIEWS
we have all witnessed smear campaigns where for other personal reasons someone writes a bad review for revenge or shills to there benifit most get found out fast others pass through ..other reviews stand true .
its up to clients to weed out the bullshit and do there own homework by calling him himself
i dont believe what i read or hear but what i see
Just because you don't agree with the ladies doesn't make it wrong
theres pros and cons to reviews
Let me repeat myself ..the writting style of reviews in Barrie as of late is very sloppy
Instead of pointing the finger why not be open to seeing the improvement in review writting otherwise the ladies wouldnt be so turned off
Oh dam time to go .... its st pattys day time to go have a green beer can we finish this discussion in the morning muahhhhh
yaya17 said:
I don't think guys get anything the same as the last guy
Infact I totally believe that every escort is YMMV with most clients
How can you tell me that because guy #1 had a ****** that guy #2 is garanteed.what he had .....guy #2 thinks hes entitled cause why he read a review ? ?????
Theres no garantee in this businesss even with REVIEWS
we have all witnessed smear campaigns where for other personal reasons someone writes a bad review for revenge or shills to there benifit most get found out fast others pass through ..other reviews stand true .
its up to clients to weed out the bullshit and do there own homework by calling him himself
i dont believe what i read or hear but what i see
Just because you don't agree with the ladies doesn't make it wrong
theres pros and cons to reviews
Let me repeat myself ..the writting style of reviews in Barrie as of late is very sloppy
Instead of pointing the finger why not be open to seeing the improvement in review writting otherwise the ladies wouldnt be so turned off
Oh dam time to go .... its st pattys day time to go have a green beer
can we finish this discussion in the morning muahhhhh
Last edited:
If you have a problem with an agency that has an NRP and if this is that important to you that you want to write reviews, then don't see any ladies from that agency....supply and demand will rule. Respect the agency's desires, if something is that important to you, find an agency that allows reviews, if it's not that important to you, then book them.
btw, can I book you Spanglerdoo????? No reviews, promise.
btw, can I book you Spanglerdoo?????
No reviews, promise.webster said:
great first post ....we do pay to advertise here ...is it mandatory ?
Last edited:
If the service levels of the SP are not what's expected and keeping in mind your NRP policy would it be fair then to review the agency?
guys love to review the bad as much as the good ...never knew a guy who wouldnt want to warn othersgreat bear said:
the ladies here are gfe ... service is not the issue
everyones dancing around the subject
to bad someone didn't at least try to make an effort for the request of not being so detailed-problem coulve been solved instead of this
I think an agency has a right to have an NRP policy. I think in this, and other free speech countries every individual has a right to ignore a NRP policy. If "there are no guarantees in this business" as SpankerDoo says, then why would anyone, especially the person who said that, expect a guarantee that their request for no reviews be upheld.
ANOTHER thought... I am a firm believer in free speech. I am an even stronger believer in equal face time, or hearing both sides of the story. I would say that providers who wish to advertise or promote on our REVIEW site, should not be allowed to quell the voice of the reviewers. Or if an agency wishes to have nothing said about it, then IT SHOULD NOT be allowed to have a voice either.
If Hot and Spicy wants a no review policy to be honoroed then remove themselves from the review web-site so that information about them is not one sided. In short Hot and Spicy could take all their "smokin hots" and "so sexys" and "angelina jolie look alike" and publish them on their web site (oh yeah they do) and not on OUR REVIEW SITE, if they don't wish to be REVIEWED on OUR REVIEW SITE.
In my humble opinion.
ANOTHER thought... I am a firm believer in free speech. I am an even stronger believer in equal face time, or hearing both sides of the story. I would say that providers who wish to advertise or promote on our REVIEW site, should not be allowed to quell the voice of the reviewers. Or if an agency wishes to have nothing said about it, then IT SHOULD NOT be allowed to have a voice either.
If Hot and Spicy wants a no review policy to be honoroed then remove themselves from the review web-site so that information about them is not one sided. In short Hot and Spicy could take all their "smokin hots" and "so sexys" and "angelina jolie look alike" and publish them on their web site (oh yeah they do) and not on OUR REVIEW SITE, if they don't wish to be REVIEWED on OUR REVIEW SITE.
In my humble opinion.
LeroyBrown said:
so in other words theres no chance in hell you will respect the ladies wishes to keep the BARRIE reviews less explicit .
.we don't have reviews on our site ...saying a gal looks like angelina jolie on her profile isn..'t a review its a description
you obviously don't get it ..ive read your complain a many times how agency advertisement was annoying you ...i remember now you only like mps
when reviews are written without every detail -- we will be signing up wherever that may be
If we need advertisements muddying up our review board in order to have a review board, then advertiesments are a necessary evil.
What I am less keen on are:
Providers making up names and posting "reviews".
Providers arguing with reviewers about reviews when their opinion is obviously biased.
And less so, providers dissing each other, or other segments of the industry. Again their opinions are so obviously biased as to make them at least partially invalid.
The public in most areas of consumption have laws and organizations to protect them. There are laws against false advertising and against bait and switch. There are the BBB and ministry of consumer and corporate affairs (probably called something different by now) and as a last resort there is small claims court. In an unregulated industry such as hobbying, there is scant protection for the little guy (HAHAHA!!). Review boards like this were created by people who cared and were not about money (at least not at first, I am SURE). And I don't even think today, that TERB is more about the money. It is about improving the industry.
NRPs take away protection for the "little guy". They are a form of censure. WORSE, they are ONE-SIDED censorship. They attempt to quell freedom of speech. They don't have any higher ground justification that I can think of.
And keeping reviews within acceptable guidelines for legal reasons is a good idea. Keeping them factual and keeping opinions identified as such is also a good idea. keeping them respectful (while sometimes not easy) is a good idea.
BUT if the purpose of this board is interfered with what purpose is served?
If providers wish to be kept off the radar, then they should stay off the radar. Don't come on here, "we're great...we're the best...we're smokin...we have great service...we're so sexy...but you are not allowed to talk about us".
It just doesn't wash.
If you want non-detailed reviews, why not ask for, push for, advocate, non-detailed reviews.
What I am less keen on are:
Providers making up names and posting "reviews".
Providers arguing with reviewers about reviews when their opinion is obviously biased.
And less so, providers dissing each other, or other segments of the industry. Again their opinions are so obviously biased as to make them at least partially invalid.
The public in most areas of consumption have laws and organizations to protect them. There are laws against false advertising and against bait and switch. There are the BBB and ministry of consumer and corporate affairs (probably called something different by now) and as a last resort there is small claims court. In an unregulated industry such as hobbying, there is scant protection for the little guy (HAHAHA!!). Review boards like this were created by people who cared and were not about money (at least not at first, I am SURE). And I don't even think today, that TERB is more about the money. It is about improving the industry.
NRPs take away protection for the "little guy". They are a form of censure. WORSE, they are ONE-SIDED censorship. They attempt to quell freedom of speech. They don't have any higher ground justification that I can think of.
And keeping reviews within acceptable guidelines for legal reasons is a good idea. Keeping them factual and keeping opinions identified as such is also a good idea. keeping them respectful (while sometimes not easy) is a good idea.
BUT if the purpose of this board is interfered with what purpose is served?
If providers wish to be kept off the radar, then they should stay off the radar. Don't come on here, "we're great...we're the best...we're smokin...we have great service...we're so sexy...but you are not allowed to talk about us".
It just doesn't wash.
If you want non-detailed reviews, why not ask for, push for, advocate, non-detailed reviews.
Spanglerdoo,
YOU use these words to REVIEW your employees...
tanned ,toned,smokin hot ,sexy,classy intelligent
incredible sexy lady
know how she goes above and beyond to put asmile on your face
petite athletic pretty blonde
smokin hot brunette ..lots of fun
hot blonde openminded
hot sexy
hot amazon native
smokin hot
hot sexy busty brunette
Wynona Ryder look alike
smokin hot blonde
hot openminded greek godess
hot blonde 21 openminded
extremely petite cute redhead
greek godess strawberry blonde
Same bunch of smokin hot ladies o this weekend
BUT you don't want ANYONE ELSE to offer THEIR opinions about your employees. You don't think I get it. Maybe YOU don't get it.
YOU use these words to REVIEW your employees...
tanned ,toned,smokin hot ,sexy,classy intelligent
incredible sexy lady
know how she goes above and beyond to put asmile on your face
petite athletic pretty blonde
smokin hot brunette ..lots of fun
hot blonde openminded
hot sexy
hot amazon native
smokin hot
hot sexy busty brunette
Wynona Ryder look alike
smokin hot blonde
hot openminded greek godess
hot blonde 21 openminded
extremely petite cute redhead
greek godess strawberry blonde
Same bunch of smokin hot ladies o this weekend
BUT you don't want ANYONE ELSE to offer THEIR opinions about your employees. You don't think I get it. Maybe YOU don't get it.
And don't try and undermine my opinion by saying that I only like MPs because that BS, as several of my reviews and several fine SPs in Barrie can attest too.
If you wanted to "OUT" a dislike of mine, it would be lying, shilling, bait and switching, bullying, agencies. Of which I have first hand experience. (NOTE THAT IF YOU TAKE OFFENSE AT THIS STATEMENT THEN IT IS BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE YOU FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY, NOT BECAUSE I SAID YOU WERE IN IT!!!)
(WOW three posts in a row, I sure sound riled up. I must really hate censorship!!!)
If you wanted to "OUT" a dislike of mine, it would be lying, shilling, bait and switching, bullying, agencies. Of which I have first hand experience. (NOTE THAT IF YOU TAKE OFFENSE AT THIS STATEMENT THEN IT IS BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE YOU FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY, NOT BECAUSE I SAID YOU WERE IN IT!!!)
(WOW three posts in a row, I sure sound riled up. I must really hate censorship!!!)
I have to agree with you Leroy.
I appears that Ms. Spanglerdoo is living in a fantasy world.
What she does not realize is that a review would help her agency and in turn help her girls (providing that the SP provides what is stated on the website)
If the SP does not provide what is advertised then Ms. Spanglerdoo should not want that person on her roster anyways.
I just don't see how a review could in any way hurt the agency - unless of course the agency is trying to BULLSHIT the paying customer and don't want their little secret to get out.
Don't fret Leroy - there are other Barrie area agencies that 'allow' us to review their ladies as well as some indy's with good reputations.
I appears that Ms. Spanglerdoo is living in a fantasy world.
What she does not realize is that a review would help her agency and in turn help her girls (providing that the SP provides what is stated on the website)
If the SP does not provide what is advertised then Ms. Spanglerdoo should not want that person on her roster anyways.
I just don't see how a review could in any way hurt the agency - unless of course the agency is trying to BULLSHIT the paying customer and don't want their little secret to get out.
Don't fret Leroy - there are other Barrie area agencies that 'allow' us to review their ladies as well as some indy's with good reputations.
