David Suzuki on Carney, climate, and pipeline 'madness' - Transcript
Jul 17, 2025
Host: Jayme Poisson
JAYME POISSON: Hi everyone, I'm Jayme Poisson.
DAVID SUZUKI: What bothers me is that in a world that's becoming extremely complex, in which the environment in many ways is being ravished very rapidly, rather than trying to recover our good environment, our clean air and clean water and so on, we may begin to say, well, let's adapt man to the noxious gasses in the air and the dirty water.
JP: For a lot of us Canadians, David Suzuki is synonymous with environmentalism. He's been a vocal advocate for environmental causes since the 1970s. So when someone that renowned says that it is too late to stop climate change, people take notice. And that is exactly what he said in an interview with iPolitics earlier this month. He said that the planet has passed too many thresholds, and that climate change and the disasters that will come with it are now inevitable. The interview caused quite a stir. Mr. Suzuki has gone on to clarify that the fight is not over and that there is still more to be done, but it's going to be a tall order, especially with a federal government that seems to be keen on building another pipeline. So today on the show I am joined by David Suzuki from Vancouver.
[Music: Theme]
JP: Mr. Suzuki, thank you so much for coming onto Front Burner.
DAVID SUZUKI: Thank you for having me.
JP: It's great to have you. So I mentioned that interview that you did with iPolitics where you said that at this point, climate change is inevitable. That it is, quote, "too late." And when you say that climate change is inevitable and that it's too late, just what do you mean by that exactly? What does that look like?
DAVID SUZUKI: Well, we've had the warnings that the climate is changing as a result of the amount of carbon we're putting in the atmosphere. The big warning that was recognized internationally was in 1988, and that's when a major international meeting was held in Toronto. And Brian Mulroney, re-elected prime minister, opened the whole meeting. It was a big deal. There were over 40 government representatives from around the world there. Scientists, environmentalists, the business community. They were all there. And at the end of the conference, they said we are conducting an experiment with consequences we can't predict, but with results that will be-- catastrophic results that will be second only to a global nuclear war. So there it was: the call, the uh, the danger. And they called for a 20% reduction in 15 years in emissions. If we had done it, we wouldn't have the problem we have today. We would have literally saved trillions of dollars. We would've saved millions of lives. But we didn't pay attention. And ever since then, the warnings have been coming in as the science has been getting stronger and stronger. And in 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a special report and said, look, we're heading towards 1.5 degree rise above pre-industrial levels. The IPCC report that came out said 1.5, absolutely, we've got to keep it to that. If we go above that, all chaos results, and we can't anticipate what it will be. And after that report came out, marijuana became legal in Canada. And guess what disappeared from the conversation? The media, I think, have simply failed to put the-- you know, we're all caught up now in 24-hour news cycles. So anything older than 12 hours seems dated. You know, you gotta get the latest. So, marijuana became far more important than the IPCC report. And report after report has been coming in. We now have hit 1.5 degrees
this year rather than 2100. We're on our way to 3. And but to me, the most damning report was the work of Johan Rockström, who's the head of the Potsdam Institute in Germany. And he has defined nine planetary boundaries that every animal species has to live within these limits. You know, pH of the oceans, the carbon in the atmosphere, the amount of available fresh water, the nitrogen cycle, and so on. If we pass any one of these nine boundaries, we should be really scared stiff. And what we've done is passed six of the nine boundaries. We're going to pass a seventh, and we passed that this year. So, seven of the nine planetary boundaries. He says -- I don't believe for a minute it's true -- but he says, we have five years. If we can pull back, radically pull back everything, we can get out of the danger zone in five years.
JP: Sorry, when you say you don't for a minute believe it's true, you don't believe that we can do it in... like, that it's possible [
DAVID: Absolutely.] to even do it in five years.
DAVID SUZUKI: Exactly.
JP: Yeah. Okay.
DAVID SUZUKI: I mean, the 1988 was a call. And we've had 28 COP council, committee of all parties, meetings on climate. Twenty-eight now, or 29. And we haven't even been able to cap emissions, let alone reduce them. You know, and António Guterres, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said a couple of years ago, any further investment in exploration for fossil fuels or building a fossil fuel infrastructure -- and that includes things like pipelines -- is moral and economic madness. And so, you know, Mark Carney, who knows more about the climate change than any other prime minister we've ever had, still is talking pipelines and has never stopped talking pipelines.
SOUNDCLIP
MARK CARNEY: It's about getting, yes, pipelines built across this country so that we can displace imports of foreign oil. It's about building out the energy infrastructure more broadly here in Alberta, which I would add would include projects such as the Pathways. It's about building energy corridors and trade corridors, including potentially up from here through to Nunavut. So we have additional deep-water ports and opportunities there.
DAVID SUZUKI: This is moral and economic madness. As António Guterres says, you know, our production of more and more fossil fuel emissions is digging our own grave. And if you're digging your own grave, the first rule is: stop digging!
[music]
JP: I want to come back to Prime Minister Carney in a moment. But of course, we are seeing the effects of climate change right now -- wildfires, weather events like floods. But I wonder if you could paint a picture for me of what you think this world is going to look like [
DAVID: I have no--] in the future.
DAVID SUZUKI: I, I have no idea. I mean, there are catastrophic things like the release of massive amounts of methane to much more powerful greenhouse gas and carbon dioxide. We've been focusing on burning, you know, fossil fuels, but there's all this methane up in the Arctic that's frozen that's now thawing out. And Guy McPherson, an ecologist from Arizona, said years ago, we're going to be extinct by 2035 because that methane is going to be released. He calls it a methane gun. Now, people go, oh, we don't know enough, you don't know... But the reality is there's all that methane and it's now melting and coming out into the atmosphere. I, I don't know. I mean, we know that the oceans are absorbing most of the increased heat. The oceans are heating up. The results in terms of the coral reefs and the, the shellfish that can't take the amount of carbon in the water... these are changes that are happening now before our eyes. I have no idea what the long-term consequences will be, except the most crude way of saying, you know, we're going to have more drought, there are going to be more and more places like Albuquerque, New Mexico, that will be uninhabitable. If you now jack up the temperature in these southern states, where you're having a hundred days, consecutive hundred days of a hundred degree or more temperature, a hundred degrees Fahrenheit, you know, it's unlivable. My concern is that the units of survival into this changing world are going to have to be local communities. And to the extent that we've prepared for these catastrophic warming, you know, will determine how much longer we can retain ourselves. But, you know, the economy is going to collapse. That's been warned about by economists. From Sir Nicholas Stern to Mark Carney himself have been warning about the economic consequences of continued elevation in temperature. It's a different world. To me, the question is, is it going to be the American way, which is as warming gets up, it's every man for himself or every country for himself and to hell with everybody else, or are we going to work together and understand that we have to change our lifestyles tremendously, that we can't go on the same the way we are? How are we going to prepare and enter into this period?
JP: Right, but even, let's say we do that, right, and we change our lifestyles tremendously... I mean, listening to you now, is it too late?
DAVID SUZUKI: Well, I mean, all the indications... I just take the science seriously. The science tells us we've passed all of these tipping points, and we have simply run out of time to reverse it. We can't go back. And so all of this stuff, you know, Bill Gates and all these people are pouring money into 'how can we take carbon out of the atmosphere' and all of that, while we're still continuing to pump the stuff out. This is crazy! We can, I think that we have to reduce our emissions radically. That is, get off fossil fuels. But, you know, we aren't even saying what has to be said, which is we cannot burn all the fossil fuels that are in the ground that we know about. It's gotta be left in the ground. No politician would dare to say we've gotta leave the fossil fuels in the ground. And Mark Carney, who knows what the problem is, you think Danielle Smith doesn't have him by the, by the neck in saying, look, don't talk about ‘no pipelines,’ we need pipelines, it's the economy of Canada. We had a prime minister of Canada for 9 1/2 years who said, what, we can't do anything about climate change. He didn't believe in it. But doing something is
crazy economics. That's what Stephen Harper's assessment was.
SOUNDCLIP
STEPHEN HARPER: Anybody can go around talking about targets. What's the actual results? Ours have been going down. Other countries' emissions, for the most part, are going up. World emissions are going up. Canada's have not been going up. So.
DAVID SUZUKI: That says the economy is more important than the atmosphere that gives us air to breathe! That gives us weather, climate and the seasons. This is madness. But all the arguments still are, oh, the economy. At the next COP meeting in Belém, Brazil, guess what? The biggest delegation will continue to be the fossil fuel industry who are going to do everything they can to keep emissions rising. It's just... [sighs]. So. You know, for years I have been told by the CBC, "You can't say that. You can't say that, that's too depressing." And even my organization, the David Suzuki Foundation. We're a charity. They say, "You can't do that. Alberta will come after us. You can't do that." And so you can't say it. I am not a part of the David Suzuki Foundation, except by my name. And I, I had to say, the science is in. It's too late to avoid the consequences, but that doesn't mean you give up then. What do we do to at least stop digging the grave?
[music]
JP: Just talking about fossil fuels here and the prime minister. You know, one of the arguments is that we are kind of at this real moment of economic vulnerability right now, specifically because of the change in dynamic with our relationship with the United States under President Trump. And so we need these kind of projects like a project like a pipeline that would bring more of our oil to Tidewater to, like, remain an independent and prosperous nation.
DAVID SUZUKI: Well, is that right?
JP: You tell me.
DAVID SUZUKI: You, you state that as if it's true. That we need the pipeline, we need the continued effort on fossil-- to pump out our fossil fuels to keep our economy going. Then to me, the conclusion is if that's true, that we've got to continue what is an unbelievably destructive industry. We've got to keep that going, even though they've been lying to us for years, taking money from the government in subsidies. We've got to keep that going to keep the economy going. Well, if our economy is built on that kind of thing, then we're going to pay the price for it. That's-- See, where I disagree with Mark is that he believes that you can use market forces and instruments, economic instruments, to bring this juggernaut under control. And it's the economy itself. It's not just fossil fuels; it's the economic demand for constant growth. Steady growth forever in a finite world is impossible. Simply impossible. And we are not living within our means. We're living on the biological capital that should be inherited by our children and grandchildren. We're using that up to keep the economy growing. This is just, it's crazy. So I think starting with the assumption that the fossil fuels in Alberta have to be got out to export to other countries, where it will be burned and release the carbon into the atmosphere. And this is the craziest kind of fossil fuel, the tar sands. You know, very, very water-intensive fuel. We want to do that? I would say the obvious thing is if you care about survival, stop supporting that kind of uh, part of our economy. [
JP: Mm-hmm.] We've got to find alternatives. But if you begin with the assumption, "It's got to be got out to the Tidewater to keep the economy growing," we're done! That's crazy. That's absolutely crazy when you
know what the problem is. You
know what part of the solution is: stop burning fossil fuels.
JP: What do you make of the prime minister's argument that this, you know, theoretical pipeline, which he recently said is likely going to be one of these projects of national interest that will be able to bypass some environmental regulations and other laws, that they would be used for decarbonized oil?
DAVID SUZUKI: Yeah. Well--
JP: Yeah, just for our listeners, I think the idea here is that the emissions it would produce would be offset by some sort of carbon capture technology. And so just what do you make of that argument?
DAVID SUZUKI: That doesn't exist. That's the whole point. We've been using the argument, and the fossil fuel industry, if they're confronted and had to face the question of climate change, has always said, look, technology will get us out of this. There are all kinds of ways of reflecting light in the atmosphere. One of the biggest names is David Keith, a Canadian, who's at the University of Chicago now, saying, well, we can have a fleet of 747s working around the clock every day of the year, spraying sulfur compounds to reflect sunlight back out. I mean, this is the conceit of our species, that we're so smart. We've screwed things up but we're going to solve it by more technology. Which is going to get us deeper and deeper into the hole. Yeah, I, I just don't buy that kind of argument. But it's been... Mr. Trudeau got us into this crazy economic system with the, with a pipeline that's now been -- the Trans Mountain Pipeline. He put in, what, 5 billion dollars into the pipeline, that is now over 34 billion dollars in this pipeline, on the crazy idea that we need to get more of that tar sands oil out to Tidewater so that we can have more tax revenue to find a way out of our, out of our dilemma. That's like saying, look, we know that smoking causes cancer, but we've got to get more people to smoke more cigarettes for the tax dollars. I mean, this is just craziness.
JP: Mm-hmm.
DAVID SUZUKI: All to protect that economic system, which is itself crazy. Because as Partha Dasgupta, a U.K. economist, showed, nature isn't a part of the economic system that we've created. Because the economics is built on human productivity and human innovation. And Mark Carney, before he was even a politician, wrote in his book
Values, that this economic system says that Amazon, Jeff Bezos' gigantic company, is valued by the economy in the tens of billions of dollars. While Amazon, the rainforest, the greatest terrestrial ecosystem on the planet, has no economic value until it is logged, mined, dammed, or grows soybeans, cattle, or cities. Now, that's why I say the system itself is so screwed up. [
JP: Mm-hmm.] It's crazy. It's just a crazy system. We don't acknowledge that we're not the centre of the action. We're living. We are alive and we can live well because nature is the producer of everything that we need. Clean air, clean water, clean soil to grow our food, clean energy from the sun. That's the foundation of our very lives. And the economy pays no attention to that. And then we think, oh, we got [unclear] politicians. We just have to get the right people elected. The best politician we've ever had in the-- as the Minister of the Environment, Stephen Guilbeault. I said to him, after he'd been in office a couple of years, "You should resign because you can't even tell the truth. You can't say how bad it is and that we're in an emergency and we have to pull out all stops." We had the best Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, Joyce Murray. She was great. But she couldn't, in battles over fish farms, she couldn't say the important thing is that we've got to protect the health of the oceans. She's a Minister of Fisheries and Oceans!
JP: Did they tell you, did they tell you that they can't say this stuff?
DAVID SUZUKI: Well, the fish and oceans don't vote. The environment doesn't vote. The reality is their survival as politicians, and therefore they are serving people, not the environment. The Minister of Forests -- trees aren't his constituency. It's people that want to cut them down. So, we've created these systems. But they're all about us, they're not about nature.
JP: The prime minister, do you see the same person now that you see in
Values, the book that Mr. Carney wrote?
DAVID SUZUKI: Yeah, I, I think he's navigating a very different world thanks to Mr. Trump. But all Mr. Trump has done is to amplify the issue that has to be confronted. And Mr. Carney will not. He's an economist, that's his whole life. [
JP: Mm-hmm.] He obviously believes in it. He's swallowed it. How can he possibly then get out and say, oh my God, this system within which I operate is itself the agent of destruction? He can't. So he, enlightened as he is, is trapped by the systems that we've created. We're all trapped. And the only way out is what Naomi Klein and people like that are saying. We need systemic transformation. Well, transformation is another word for revolution. And you can't use a word like revolution. But if we don't have transformation, then we're just doing what I and environmentalists have been doing for a long time: hoping for incremental change. But they haven't changed the fundamental drive of steady growth.
[music]
JP: Mr. Suzuki, knowing where you are now and kind of looking back on your career, what would you have done differently about the way that you approached this fight throughout your life?
DAVID SUZUKI: I don't spend my time, you know, wishing that I could change history by, by-- could have changed history. That-- You know, what's done is done. But you can learn from it. As an environmentalist, I say we have fundamentally failed to shift the narrative. You know, when we began the foundation in 1990, environmentalism, environmentalists were at the top of the agenda. The environment was everybody's concern. We were going towards the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992. The environment was up there. When Brian Mulroney was re-elected in 1988, he said the environment's important. I'm gonna appoint my most important new politician as minister of the environment. Lucien Bouchard -- remember him? He was a... He was a star that came in. I interviewed him months after he was appointed minister, and I said, Mr. Minister, now that you've been in here a while, what do you think is the most important environmental issue? And right away, he said, global warming. And that really blew me away. This is 1988. I said, how serious is it? He said, “It threatens the survival of our species. We have to act now.” 1988! He said it! The politicians had got it. And what happened? You know, he left, and now is... I guess Quebec's separation was more important than the survival of our species. If you look at the history of what we've done, the scientific community... In 1992, over half of all Nobel Prize winners alive at that time signed a document: "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity." And it started: "Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course." And they defined what had to be done. And we didn't do anything about that World Scientists' Warning, so that 25 years later, 15,000 scientists signed it from 184 countries in the world. Signed, World Scientists' Warning: Two. That everything had got worse. Why haven't we put science above everything else?
JP: Well, I mean, why? Like, I had the energy minister on this show a couple of weeks ago, and I've been thinking a lot about something he said. He said that -- We were talking about the Building Canada Act that would sort of push through these national projects, potentially a pipeline, right. And he said this is what Canadians voted for. And it's actually not clear to me that he was wrong, right? That maybe this is what Canadians voted for. Like, why has this fallen off? Why are people no longer really seized with it? Why do they not vote on it?
DAVID SUZUKI: Well, I think the reality is that the Liberals were absolutely rock bottom, and had Mr. Trump not intervened at a time when Mr. Carney happened to come in... Mr. Trump elected Mark Carney. Canadians didn't vote for Mark Carney because of what he offered in terms of, you know, a way forward in terms of the environmental crisis or anything. They voted for Mark Carney as a way to avoid, or try to avoid the heavy consequences of dealing with Donald Trump. And, you know, he, Mr. Trump, single-handedly kept out someone who, by his statements, embraced what Mr. Trump's approach is. So I thank Mr. Trump for getting Mr. Carney elected, but I don't see that he'll be much different from Trudeau or any of the other Liberal ministers we've had in the past. Because they're trapped by the system. And the system says, you know, that Alberta is a critical part of the voting audience, and right now they're... they're putting all their eggs in the oil basket. So. He's going to have to-- He, he will not have the strength to say-- Unless he says, "I don't care about re-election. I only care about what has to be done now." That's the only way we're gonna get out of this. We have to get climate change and species extinction, all these other problems, out of the political realm and make it something that confronts all of us. The way we do in science fiction movies when an invader from outer space lands and starts killing people indiscriminately. We have an alien invasion right now. It's not an alien species from outer space; it's an alien mindset that thinks we're in control and it's all about us. For most of human existence, we knew we were embedded in nature and depended on us-- uh, we were dependent on it. But now most of us live in big cities where our primary focus is on our jobs. We need a job to buy the things that we need. And so the economy assumes this high, this high position. And nature, we think, oh, nature's out there in parks and so on. We never think, if we don't have air for three to four minutes, we're dead. If we have to breathe polluted air perpetually, we're sick. And yet we use air -- this most important sacred gift from nature -- as a garbage can. And we won't pay a cent. "Damn it all! I will not pay a carbon tax to use air as a garbage can for our fossil fuel emissions." [sighs]... Anyway, I'm just going on in a crazy rant. I'm sorry. You know, this is why, at this point, to everybody who believes that, you know, the systems, the legal, economic, and political systems, they're what have to be changed or altered or refocused, but we can't destroy them, to them, people like me sound like mad men. We are... We are mad because the system is now our enemy.
JP: Mr. Suzuki, I want to thank you very much for this.
DAVID SUZUKI: Thank you.
