Asia Studios Massage

Corporations Aiding the Iranian Regime

persis

New member
Jan 26, 2007
1,281
0
0

http://stopaidingdictators.wordpress.com/corporations-helping-iranian-dictators/cisco-systems/
*
Corporations Aiding the Iranian Regime
o Advantech*
o Alvarion/Netronics Networks*
o BASF
o BayernGas
o Cisco Systems*
o Coca-Cola
o General Electric
o Halliburton
o Heckler & Koch (HK)
o Hughes*
o i-Direct*
o ND-Satcom*
o Nokia Siemens Networks
o Siemens AG
o Steiner-Prematechnik-Gastec (SPG)
o Risk Update
o Sweet Swedes: Stockholm Police solidarity with Iranians


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cisco Systems*

Corporation: Cisco Systems*

Corporate website: http://www.cisco.com

Contact information: contact webform, Investor Relations Department: Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA; phone: (408) 526-8890; fax: (408) 853-3683

Country: US

Product/service provided to Iran: This American networking giant’s technology is the most critical asset of the Islamic dictatorship in maintaining communications and data links between military, police, security forces, state owned media and propaganda machine, and other government agencies. Cisco routers not only route, switch and manage the entire network traffic for the regime, but also are used for creating secure and encrypted communications channels, such as VPN/IPSec tunnels, all of it centrally managed by the highly capable CiscoWorks software. VoIP communications technology supplied by Cisco is also utilized heavily by the Iranian government agencies, including IP phones and Cisco’s Callmanager software. Experts estimate that there are more Cisco routers and switches in Iran than in the entire Middle East combined. Every single bank branch uses at least one access router, one edge router and two switches. There are over 12,000 branches of government-owned banks in Iran. Every IRGC, Basij, military, police, and Ministry of Intelligence base and branch has racks of this stuff. The entire national IP-MPLS and Metro Ethernet network is built on Cisco equipment. The Ministry of ICT’s RFP for tenders were written in such way that Huawei could not possibly be proposed in these projects – the only equipment able to satisfy the technical requirements of RFPs were those manufactured by Cisco. The higher end carrier-class routers and core switches are made-to-order items, not a regular inventory item. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of pieces of this restricted equipment here, and Cisco’s credibility in declaring they didn’t know where this enormous amount of equipment has gone to, is about as plausible as Ahmadinejad’s claims that Neda was killed in a pre-plotted devious plan by British-trained spies masquerading as basijis.

Benefits to the dictatorship of Iran: Cisco products constitute the most critical asset of the Islamic dictatorship in maintaining communications and data links between military, police, security forces, state owned media and propaganda machine, and other government agencies.

Impact on citizens of Iran: Cisco product is used extensively by the regime’s military, paramilitary, police and intelligence units, constituting just one way in which Western technologies are being used to repress Iranian civilians directly. Facilitating the work of the Iranian government (and by implication, the private sector, since so many “private” interests are essentially government-held) by making computer networking more reliable, efficient and effective in turn facilitates profit-making by Iranian corporations, which profits may then be reinvested into the furtherance of the regime’s agenda to develop weapons of mass destruction. Computing power is also a pre-requisite for the further research, design, and development of various types of military technologies.

News sources linking this corporation with questionable trade in Iran:
Inside Iran by Andrew Seymour, December 22, 2008. Although it is difficult to find direct substantiation of claims that Cisco provides their technologies to the Iranian dictatorship, this article does a good job of describing the ways in which computing technologies find their way past the trade embargos, most usually through Dubai (where Cisco maintains offices).

It is therefore something of an irony that while Iran is home to a burgeoning IT channel and regarded by many as the largest IT market in the region it remains a no-go area for many vendors - at least officially.

Ongoing trade embargoes prohibit US technology companies from conducting business in Iran, a directive that has prevented some notable industry heavyweights with in-country offices throughout the region from establishing any formal local presence. Household names such as AMD, Intel, Cisco, Dell and Microsoft are all affected by the ban.

This scenario has its constraints for the Iranian IT market although it’s not necessarily as destructive as you’d perhaps expect due to the high level of re-export activity that takes place.

IT kit sold into the UAE channel remains the primary source of supply, with products often passing through several conduits prior to being absorbed by the Iranian market.
Subsequently, Iranian buyers have access to most of the brands available elsewhere.

“90% of the Iranian IT market is provided by Dubai dealers or distributors,” claimed a source at one trader, emphasising Iran’s reliance on the re-export market.



For vendors restricted by the embargo the prospect of not being able to conduct any form of channel development or management would appear frustrating, although not everybody agrees with that view. One source alleges that some vendors are quite content with the situation as their products are invariably making their way into the Iranian market without them incurring any costs.

“At least 40% of all Middle East local office sales are going to Iran, but as long as there is no official document showing that they sold it there they cannot give that MDF or rebate to the market,” said the source. “Sometimes you will see some strange movements because of this.”
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Exactly!
The MIC only cares about the 'bottom line'.
Any beancounter will tell you that....;)
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Isn't there a law that says corporations must be apolitical? Otherwise, the murdering Islamic Iranian mullahs will file a discrimination complaint with the Human Rights Commission.
 

gramage

New member
Feb 3, 2002
5,223
1
0
Toronto
Rockslinger said:
Isn't there a law that says corporations must be apolitical? Otherwise, the murdering Islamic Iranian mullahs will file a discrimination complaint with the Human Rights Commission.
There is no law forcing you to do business in any country any more then there's a law forcing companies to advertise on all networks.

But why would anyone be surprised by this? Such is the nature of capitalism. You don't get to be the head of companies that powerful unless you are a ethicless monster who would shoot your own newborn child in the head in the delivery room for a 5% increase in stock value. I thought that was a given.
 

Mrbig1949

New member
Jun 3, 2009
1,756
0
0
Good old IBM at the top of the list Siemens...

Scarey said:
You should see the list of folks who helped the nazi's.Capitalism has no flag, and no borders
Who backed Italian Fascists? Pirelli Tires, FIAT lots of others. When the chips were down the capitalists chose the Nazis and Fascists over the Communists.
 

Mrbig1949

New member
Jun 3, 2009
1,756
0
0
Interesting that the USA won't allow support of Cuba...

gramage said:
There is no law forcing you to do business in any country any more then there's a law forcing companies to advertise on all networks.

But why would anyone be surprised by this? Such is the nature of capitalism. You don't get to be the head of companies that powerful unless you are a ethicless monster who would shoot your own newborn child in the head in the delivery room for a 5% increase in stock value. I thought that was a given.
But the PRC, Vietnam, Iran, and all the other totaliterian states are ok.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Scarey said:
You should see the list of folks who helped the nazi's.Capitalism has no flag, and no borders
I think one was named Kennedy and another was named Bush. Go figure.

MB, Cuba's too close to home. It's only a swim away.
 

Cinema Face

New member
Mar 1, 2003
3,636
2
0
The Middle Kingdom
If you care about not supporting that evil regime, then stop buying their oil.

Iran is just one of many terrorism sponsoring countries in the ME. We shouldn’t be buying oil from the ME period. Currently, over a billion dollars flows into the Persian Gulf every day and the money goes into propping up corrupt governments that oppress the people and finance terrorism internationally.

Currently, we are fighting a war on terror but paying for both sides.

So, stop buying gas from oil companies that buy oil from the ME. In Canada the only ones that don’t are Petro-Canada and Sunoco.

The Terror Free Oil initiative.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Cinema Face said:
If you care about not supporting that evil regime, then stop buying their oil.
Glad to see you agree with a with a pretty smart guy who was a humble peanut farmer from Georgia, who went on to become a nuclear engineer, then POTUS in 1976, who said exactly the same things!
Pres Jimmy Carter said, we Don't need any offshore OIL and he set up a 'Project Independence Program' to find alternate fuels so we WOULDN'T have to import a drop of OIL! Sadly MYOPIC & brainless Ronnie Reagan became the next POTUS and at the BEHEST of BIG OIL, Ronnie one by one, killed off ALL of those Project Independence Programs.....helping to make the USA even more dependent on offshore OIL.
 

CapitalGuy

New member
Mar 28, 2004
5,773
1
0
gramage said:
Such is the nature of capitalism. You don't get to be the head of companies that powerful unless you are a ethicless monster who would shoot your own newborn child in the head in the delivery room for a 5% increase in stock value. I thought that was a given.
Please provide information on an alternative economic system by which we can run our nations more successfully.
 

gramage

New member
Feb 3, 2002
5,223
1
0
Toronto
CapitalGuy said:
Please provide information on an alternative economic system by which we can run our nations more successfully.
Did I say there was a better option? No. Capitalism makes the most sense because human nature doesn't destroy it like most systems do, but that doesn't excuse it's evils.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
CapitalGuy said:
Please provide information on an alternative economic system by which we can run our nations more successfully.
Well you could check out where folks are happiest and live the longest and do what is working for them!....:cool:
 

dcbogey

New member
Sep 29, 2004
3,170
0
0
WoodPeckr said:
Exactly!
The MIC only cares about the 'bottom line'.
Any beancounter will tell you that....;)
So I guess it's safe to assume you don't own any of those companies in your 401k or other investment portfolios.
 

Mrbig1949

New member
Jun 3, 2009
1,756
0
0
Social Democracy

CapitalGuy said:
Please provide information on an alternative economic system by which we can run our nations more successfully.
The worlds best system often seen in northern Europe. Democratic to the core, social justice oriented, produces high standard of living, just kills the USA in health and education outcomes, scores the highest on human development index.

In short vastly superior to hands off the wheel crass capitalism in every single way. Even produces higher average standard of living. Canada is getting there but needs a few more reforms.
 

CapitalGuy

New member
Mar 28, 2004
5,773
1
0
Mrbig1949 said:
The worlds best system often seen in northern Europe. Democratic to the core, social justice oriented, produces high standard of living, just kills the USA in health and education outcomes, scores the highest on human development index.

In short vastly superior to hands off the wheel crass capitalism in every single way. Even produces higher average standard of living. Canada is getting there but needs a few more reforms.

You are simply talking about degrees of capitalism, not an alternative to it. The social democracies on this planet also fully embrace capitalism.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
CapitalGuy said:
You are simply talking about degrees of capitalism, not an alternative to it. The social democracies on this planet also fully embrace capitalism.
Except they are painted as commie/socialists by those who promote having unregulated capitalism at its worst, as their ideal!....:rolleyes:
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,042
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
dcbogey said:
So I guess it's safe to assume you don't own any of those companies in your 401k or other investment portfolios.
I do the best possible to avoid them.....;)
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Wait, how is Coca-cola helping Iran?

OTB
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,796
2,451
113
Mrbig1949 said:
Who backed Italian Fascists? Pirelli Tires, FIAT lots of others. When the chips were down the capitalists chose the Nazis and Fascists over the Communists.
And you would have preferred the communists?
(why does that not surprise me?)
Do not for one minute think I support fascism.

Given the choice between two very evil and objectionable options, I suspect they determined the fascists were the ones who would not nationalist their business & throw them out into the street or execute them (as happened in Russia).

Do you give any pause to think at all before writing or does it just flow from your head like diarrhea
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts