La Villa Spa
Toronto Escorts

Canadians will pay dearly for Ottawa’s carbon tax

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,583
1,748
113
Ghawar
June 19, 2024

Critics of the carbon tax (such as myself) argue that by taxing the energy and material inputs of virtually every element of economic activity, the tax will essentially raise the cost of all goods and services (housing, transportation, food, heating and cooling, health care, etc.) in Canada.

Governments, including the Trudeau government, often hand-wave away such criticisms, arguing that industries will find ways to innovatively and inexpensively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and that, in any event, the government plans to rebate 90% of the tax to Canadian households so Canadians are not worse off.

But new data generated by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and the parliamentary budget officer (after being suppressed by the Trudeau government for some time) has put a price on the carbon tax. As reported in the National Post, the ECCC “estimates that the real, or inflation-adjusted, gross domestic product in a scenario without a carbon tax in 2030 would be ($2.688 trillion.) With a carbon tax, that number drops to ($2.663 trillion), a difference of $25 billion. That amounts to a 0.92% reduction in real GDP in 2030. It is slightly lower than the PBO’s estimation of 1.3% which it predicted in its first economic analysis in 2022.”

When one considers that Canada’s lacklustre economic performance in recent years has generated a GDP that compares with the low growth rates of the 1930s and that real GDP in 2023 grew by only 1.1%, losing another 1% to the carbon tax would represent a rather large loss. (For those keeping track, GDP in the United States grew by 3.3% in 2023.)

So the Trudeau government’s carbon tax is very costly. This should come as no surprise. According to a 2021 study published by the Fraser Institute, a $170-per-tonne carbon tax (the level it’s slated to reach in 2030) would impose significant costs on Canada’s economy, causing a 1.8% drop in GDP and the loss of about 185,000 jobs nationwide.

As noted in the study, the “economic costs vary by province. Alberta will experience a 2.4% reduction in GDP while Quebec and British Columbia will face drops of 1.5% and 1.6%. The largest proportionate burdens of job losses will fall on Ontario and Alberta, with Quebec and British Columbia close behind.” The analysts note that a $170-per-tonne carbon tax would spur significant reductions in Canadian greenhouse gas emissions — but at levels insufficient for Canada to comply with its commitments to international agreements such as the Paris Agreement.

For years now, Canada’s politicians have downplayed and dismissed criticisms of the carbon tax levied by analysts who predicted the carbon tax would, indeed, inflict significant harm to Canada’s economy and the economies of Canadian households. Now with the cat out of the bag by virtue of the government’s own internal estimates, it’s time for a more honest discussion about the costs and benefits of the tax. Hopefully, the Trudeau government will seize the moment and seriously consider removing the carbon tax to avoid future harm to already economically labouring Canadian families.


 
  • Like
Reactions: K Douglas

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,260
4,157
113
All taxes increase the cost of living, the question is how much you want to raise and the least destructive way to raise it.

Taxing negative externalities if it goes into general revenue is one of the best ways to raise money. Unless you are an anarcho capitalist or a minarchist, or delulu when it comes to global warming, it's a tax you should support [if the money raised went into general revenue which is it will never be because people are retarded.

This is where Frankfooter reads the above and somehow figured I am I donno, morally opposed to bacon or some other retarded nonsense that he desperately wants to believe in an attempt to "get me'
 

TomFord1980

Well-known member
Jan 9, 2017
1,171
780
113
Is that from DoFo, who has failed at every single one of those items?
Or is it from PeePee who voted against housing, crime and doing anything?
Frankie my boy, do you have any receipts to back up your claims? Pierre appears to be the only candidate with his head on straight.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
4,408
2,091
113
Is that from DoFo, who has failed at every single one of those items?
Or is it from PeePee who voted against housing, crime and doing anything?
That's from the inevitable future where we fix this country and get rid of the Communists that have ruined it.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts