Canada Court rules all non-penetrative sex acts involving animals are legal

Twister

Well-known member
Aug 24, 2002
4,803
538
113
GTA
What kind of garbage is this? Strange, I saw it on RT not on Canadian sites.

Canada’s Supreme Court has acquitted a British Columbia man of bestiality charges as under the country’s laws a sexual act with an animal can be found unlawful only in the case of it involving penetration.
The man, known only by initials DLW convicted of 13 counts of sexually assaulting his two stepdaughters over a 10-year period has successfully challenged a separate count of bestiality which, as it turns out, requires penetration for it to have been illegal.

The decision that was supported by all but one of the justices acquitted the man of forcing the family dog to take part in the sexual abuse of his stepdaughters, Reuters reported.

“Although bestiality was often subsumed in terms such as sodomy or buggery, penetration was the essence – ‘the defining act’ – of the offence,” the court said, according to the Independent.

The court didn’t have the power to rule otherwise since all of the previous decisions regarding bestiality have always involved penetration which is an obligatory aspect in such cases, Justice Thomas Cromwell, writing on behalf of all judges, said.

“Parliament adopted that term [bestiality] without adding a definition of it, and the legislative history and evolution of the relevant provisions show no intent to depart from the well-understood legal meaning of the term.”

“Any expansion of criminal liability for this offense is within parliament’s exclusive domain,” Cromwell concluded.

DLW is serving a 16-year prison sentence and the bestiality conviction was brought before the court on appeal. According to the materials in the case, DLW used peanut butter to make the dog lick the genitals of his victims while he filmed the act. He tried to force the dog to have intercourse with the stepdaughters, but didn’t succeed.

The controversial ruling should encourage lawmakers to reconsider the “outdated” 1954 law as it puts animals in Canada in danger, a representative for Animal Justice said.

“As of today, Canadian law gives animal abusers license to use animals for their own sexual gratification. This is completely unacceptable, contrary to societal expectations, and cannot be allowed to continue,” executive director of Animal Justice, Camille Labchuk, told the Independent in an emailed statement.

https://www.rt.com/news/346036-canada-bestiality-court-ruling/
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,549
2
0
“As of today, Canadian law gives animal abusers license to use animals for their own sexual gratification.
One of our esteem members has repeatedly said that animals have no rights (they are the same as things) except for the rights that humans grant to them.
 

Twister

Well-known member
Aug 24, 2002
4,803
538
113
GTA
One of our esteem members has repeatedly said that animals have no rights (they are the same as things) except for the rights that humans grant to them.
Could be Danmand, the Danes have animal bordellos, they love fucking animals.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,858
3,127
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
the slippery slope argument is true
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
85,828
129,280
113
RT! Putin's favourite "news" source......

And so balanced in its coverage.... All the judges said was that there was judicial case law dating back centuries defining bestiality as "penetrative". Where a criminal act is repeatedly and specifically defined by the courts, then only Parliament can change that law - by rewriting the provision in different terms.

This is a standard judicial interpretation of criminal statutes. The rule of interpretation is that criminal statutes are interpreted narrowly, so the citizen can always know what is legal and what is illegal and act accordingly. This covers business practices, taxation and now, I guess, animal sex abuse as well.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,006
48
48
In Canada having oral sex with animals is legal , but you can go to jail for having a blowjob with a human ( bill c-36)
hahahaha that fucked fucked up.

Honestly I think any none cruel beastiality should be legal, I eat meat, lots of it, so how can I take the moral high ground on this issue, just because I'd never have sex with an animal. Would rather be the dog or horse that gets a BJ from a pretty girl, or the cow that ended up in my hamburger?

Sexually assaulting the step daughters is far more concerning honestly.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
13,040
3,099
113
A buddy told me he picked a girl one day and went back to her place to have sex. At one point she was on her back, he was kneeling beside her getting a BJ when her dog jumped up on the bed and started performing DATY. He said by the way she was enjoying it, that wasn't the first time. MK9F threesome. Hmmmmmm...
 
Last edited:

JessyCeleste

Twitter: @JessyCeleste1
What about when a cat tries to suck your nipples?
lol both puppies and kittens have been known to do this... Its what happens when you take em away from mama too early, which unfortunately, is common practice with breeders. But ya, every time I hear it it makes me laugh cuz the story usually goes that the woke in the morning with a furry thing dangling off their nipple, suckling with all their might. lol

The rest of this enrages me so much.. I need to stick with 'No Comment' on here.. Such a huge embarrassment for our country.
 

buttercup

Active member
Feb 28, 2005
2,565
11
38
One of our esteem members has repeatedly said that animals have no rights (they are the same as things) except for the rights that humans grant to them.
Likewise, we humans have no rights except for the rights that humans grant to us.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,515
6,739
113
What if you pay the goat? Will that fall under C-36?
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,308
17
38
One of our esteem members has repeatedly said that animals have no rights (they are the same as things) except for the rights that humans grant to them.
Indeed this article echoes that statement which I quoted from another source. The law has to change to protect animals from being used for sexual purposes ("bestiality" should apply to any act of a sexual nature). Another newspaper article that I read had one judge dissenting, say that it's remarkable that the bestiality law was not updated like other laws dealing with sexual offences. (IOW, perhaps 'bestiality" should've been given a more liberal interpretation that would be in line with the evolution of criminal law involving other sexual offences).
 
Toronto Escorts