Incalls are 100% illegal. There is no grey area. Section 210 of the criminal code - Bawdy houses.
It is very much of a grey area, particularly in terms of non-permanent locations. Can you please provide any recent examples of found-in (210.2.b) or inmate of (210.2.a.) charges being laid for an independent working on her own in a hotel room? There are increased risks of charges if women share a room, but even those are extremely rare. Bawdy house laws are overwhelmingly used to target workers in body rubs and permanent in-call locations.
I would agree with you that the distinction on TERB is fairly arbitrary. A couple of local providers work out of their homes (or homes that are permanent locations). What they are doing is just as illegal as working the Streets, so it is odd that we can talk about one and not the other. You would have to ask the Mods for their thinking in that regard.
I know women who do escorting and street work. Do you?
I have a close friend who currently escorts (not on the streets) and other sex trade workers who are acquaintances (one of whom worked the streets briefly in the early 00's). I've had two girlfriends who were involved in the industry (one when we were together, one before we were together). So, yeah, I know some women (and one man, actually) in the trade.
Do I know any current street-workers? Not that I'm aware of. The women I know/knew who worked the streets stopped many years ago. If anything, the situation for women who work the streets is MUCH more negative today than 10 or 20 years ago, and it is baffling that you are suggesting otherwise.
You are really stereotyping right now
How? By suggesting that it is "generally exploitative" or by saying that we will have to "agree to disagree in terms of the nature of street-level prostitution"? Where is the stereotype? Saying that it is generally cold in November is not the same as saying every day in November is cold. Are you honestly suggesting that the majority of women who work the streets, particularly in a place like Barrie, are "in a good place"?
and you do not speak for sex workers.
But you do?!? What? And when did I suggest that I did?
There are sex worker organizations you can call and get their views on this (maggies or spoc). They agree with what I am saying and that is why they are fighting these laws.
Wow. You're attempting to have an argument with me about things that I never said and using logical fallacies to do so!
At what point did I express any opinion, pro or against, regarding decriminalization of street work? In what way did I demean women who work the Streets?
Women who work the streets do so in a demonstrably riskier environment than other sex workers. They are more likely to be under the control/protection of a "handler". They are often at the margins of the industry and more vulnerable to exploitation and victimization. And, before you jump on me, there are obviously many examples of exploitation in the sex trade that take place behind closed doors. There is a serious problem with sex trafficking in our country both in terms of foreign and underage workers. These are scourges and the people who traffic these women / girls deserve the harshest penalties imaginable. Much of this takes place through in calls far removed from the Streets.
That isn't the point, though, as your question was why Street reviews are not allowed here. I answered your question, which has somehow put you on this tangent. You've bizarrely twisted the objectives of noble groups like Maggie's & SPOC (
to enable all sex workers to ply their trade safely and with dignity) to argue that the Street Scene is a positive experience for sex workers. It isn't. Our laws don't help, and I agree that they should be changed to protect & empower women who choose to work the Streets. That doesn't change the reality of the Streets today.
It sounds like you have a friend or friends who do fine on the streets. That is excellent, and I honestly hope that it continues to be the case for them.
Stay frosty.