I think that if any person (sick or injured) has even the slightest possibility of life that all available resources should be utilized to help insure their recovery. Whether that person is `beyond hope`or not is not for us to say. The only exception I feel is if that person, being of legal age and being able to legally comprehend all pertinate circumstances chooses not to live any further with either their illness or disability.
I was in a similar postion a few years ago when my dad passed away from cancer. We as a family tried to do everything we could to help him but all we were doing was prolonging his suffering.
It`s heart breaking when anyone is put in that position and it`s easy for us as "outsiders" to say what should or shouldn't be done. But to be put in that position I wish the decisions were as easy as some may feel they are. They're not. Your heart will most of the time win out and you try to do everything you can think of to help when at the same time your mind is telling you that you're fighting a loosing battle.
MISS YOU DAD!
POST..... Agreed, in hindsight, my family may have made our decision selfishly to help my dad in his fight and prolong his suffering because of our love for him and that we didn't want to lose him. But like I mentioned, most of us placed in that position will probably decide with our hearts and not our minds initially. Whereas when making such decisions with our hearts we never see the ramifications, the consequences, that inevitably. Our minds deal with things on more of a logical level and emotions are always secondary to that process. The trick is (and there is no easy answer or way to do this) is to find a common ground in making such decisions with your mind AND your heart together. Is this easy? As mentioned the answer to that is a definite NO. I know I couldn't do it and I will regret that for the rest of my life.