Attorney Dismisses 60 Prostitution Cases

For U.S. folks this has national implications since these tactics are often used in the U.S. For those in Canada be glad your not in the U.S. which is why I enjoy Canada so much where you have far more private adult sexwork freedoms.

MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY DISMISSES 60 SHERIFF'S PROSTITUTION CASES

Note Sheriff Joe implying going after PRIVATE prostitutes protects children. Where do people get these silly ideas? STD risk? With private adult prostitution legal in almost all the world except the U.S., there has never been any link to high STD risk. In fact probably far safer than picking up a women in a bar. Of course I am only referring to private sexworkers not street hookers.

Sheriff Joe's investigators' nudity, sex contact dooms prostitution cases
The Arizona Republic
Jun. 15, 2004 07:59 PM

About 60 people arrested last year in a prostitution sting will not be criminally charged because Maricopa County sheriff's deputies used tactics including nudity and sexual contact in their undercover operations, county prosecutors announced Tuesday.

Maricopa County prosecutors believe the two-month sting, which targeted suspected prostitutes and men accused of soliciting sex for money, was botched by sheriff's officials who allowed undercover deputies and department "Posse" members to remove their clothing and engage in sex acts on videotape.

"The credibility of the officers and the tactics they used are so abhorrent that we believe the likelihood of conviction has disappeared," special assistant county attorney Barnett Lotstein said. "At no time did our office ever, explicitly or implicitly, sign off on anything relating to the conduct that they employed."

In a hastily scheduled press conference, a visibly frustrated Arpaio defended his staffers, saying he believes they acted professionally and followed the law. Arpaio hinted that politics played a role in Tuesday's decision to reject the cases, but would not discuss a renewed strain on his relationship with Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley.

"I do my job, politics or no politics, and I'm going to continue to do my job, politics or no politics," Arpaio said. "My main mission is to protect the public, protect the kids. We're going to continue to do our jobs." The cases rejected by county prosecutors stem from arrests made between September and November last year during two investigations dubbed Operations "House Call" and "Destiny." Deputies targeted 33 homes and 10 massage parlors in "House Call," while "Destiny" was a sting operation out of three Valley hotels.

Among the suspects arrested were a local radio station's sales manager, a state corrections officer and a woman who billed herself as a former Miss Canada. Some of the women were tracked down after sheriff's investigators found suggestive ads in local publications.

The operations, which drew national attention, were criticized at the time by some community members, who believed devoting about 400 officers to such a low-level crime was a waste of resources.

But Arpaio remained defiant on Tuesday, saying prostitution endangers public safety and spreads sexually transmitted diseases.

Sheriff's Capt. Don Schneidmiller said county prosecutors took part in planning meetings and knew that deputies planned to remove clothing and possibly engage in "inadvertent" sexual touching. Schneidmiller, who raised his voice several times while discussing Tuesday's developments, described the prosecutors' decision as "ridiculous" and accused the county attorney's office of misrepresenting his operation. "I can't begin to tell you how offended I am by this," Schneidmiller said. "My guys were professional, they were responsible. I view this . . . as a slap in the face and I know my guys do too."

Lotstein insisted prosecutors were unaware of any plans for nudity and would not have condoned such tactics. "We did not sign off on nudity," Lotstein said.

David Dusenbury, a retired deputy chief of police who has lectured and taught vice investigations in California, said authorities who engage in sexual contact have committed a crime. "Oh my. That's not acceptable," Dusenbury said. "You just have to back away and figure out another way to skin the cat." If investigators had sexual contact with the women, "then what you have is vice officers actually engaged in prostitution," Dusenbury said. "Then you've committed a crime yourself."

Vice officers can make their cases in other ways than doing anything illegal, he said. Surveillance, questioning johns and having a known customer introduce the investigator are all widely acceptable ways of making prostitution collars, he said.

Dave in Phoenix
Phoenix Private List Community since 1996
http://www.sexwork.com
http://www.sexworkcanada.com
http://www.touchangels.com
http://www.libchrist.com
 

i_am_good

Well-known member
Apr 1, 2002
1,149
35
48
Hhhhmmmm....

...I wonder...

How many of those undercover cops called in sick during that sting operation? I bet they didn't mind working overtime!

So let me see, the cops got paid to get free cash, to go "play" with SPs. Were any of these guys married? What about STDs? Are they still hiring?
 

gala

New member
Sep 9, 2002
318
1
0
I'm sure Dave will give you the lowdown for the actual potential sentences if getting a criminal record in itself is not enough for you. (My last employer did a criminal record check on me before hiring me... had I had some record it might have cost me the job). Here's something for the Canadians to consider: You can be permanently banned from ever entering the United States again if you fit any of these categories:

(1) You ever crossed or intended to cross into the United States to engage in prostitution or a prostitution related crime. (You could appeal and claim it wasn't your intent, but something you decided later though--this is mostly used against people importing or being imported as prostitutes).

(2) You are guilty of two unrelated crimes of "moral turpitude" (including prostitution) where the maximum allowed sentence for the crime was six months or less regardless of the actual sentence received.

(3) You are guilty of ONE crime of violence or moral turpitude where the maximum possible sentence was greater than six months, regardless of the actual sentence received.

The net result is that once you complete your sentence, if any, they can deport you and permanently ban you from ever re-entering the country. This is true even if the judge gives you a suspended sentence or a fine instead of jail time because it's based on the maximum rather than actual sentence--so somethign that would ordinarily be no big deal for a US citizen can turn into an awful nightmare if you are not a citizen. Note that these rules apply to you even if you were convicted of the offences in some other country, they can still exclude you--though obviously they'd have to somehow know about it.

If you're travelling to the US my advice to you would be to get it at home where it's perfectly legal before you go.
 

gala

New member
Sep 9, 2002
318
1
0
Yeah, hehehe, I'm sure dave will fill you in. I think it varies from state to state. Generally I'd think it's typically a misdemeanor charge (probably under 6 months in jail) but againt it probably varies.
 

HaywoodJabloemy

Dissident
Apr 3, 2002
656
0
0
Never the safest place
The US laws are more severe, but it sounds like the will to enforce them is slowly disappearing among police in some of the more progressive cities. There was a recent post on Terb from someone talking about the San Francisco Bay area, and it doesn't sound much different from Toronto as far as what is tolerated.

A few years ago 20/20 had a story by John Stossel exploring the idea that criminalizing prostitution does more harm than good, and a former San Jose police chief (I think his name was McNamara) acknowledged they go through the motions to make it look like they care about trying to stop it, but they really don't.
 
Toronto Escorts