I'm only 20, from the posts I've read on the forum from SP's, most wouldn't even take clients under the age of 25... was just wondering if this was a universal thing or not.
Are escorts age discriminatory?
- Thread starter DemLatsSoClose
- Start date
Discriminatory? I don't think that's the right word. More a matter of what they are comfortable with.
Everyone has their preferences... and it is entirely up to the SP in question what she is willing to do and with whom. Afterall, this is a rather intimate service they are providing right?
Everyone has their preferences... and it is entirely up to the SP in question what she is willing to do and with whom. Afterall, this is a rather intimate service they are providing right?
We got into this a little bit in the other "age" thread, but the young clients can be problematic. Far more likely to be intoxicated and to have attitude ("I don't really need to pay for it", etc.).
My guess is the SPs want guys who are a little more comfortable hobbying.
My guess is the SPs want guys who are a little more comfortable hobbying.
Young SPs might also prefer older guys because they're more likely to find the SP hot.
When you're young and attractive, you are more particular about other people's appearances. But when you get to middle age, most young women look attractive. So the older guys are probably more appreciative.
When you're young and attractive, you are more particular about other people's appearances. But when you get to middle age, most young women look attractive. So the older guys are probably more appreciative.
Typically agencies are less restrictive about it than indies.
That's one of the pros of being an indy is you get to set your criteria.
I can't think of an agency that says no guys under 25.
But in fairness I am well over 25 so it has not been an issue in well over a decade.
That's one of the pros of being an indy is you get to set your criteria.
I can't think of an agency that says no guys under 25.
But in fairness I am well over 25 so it has not been an issue in well over a decade.
Most SPs do check out age etc. One way or another. I know an SP, on a non business level, who is 60. She looks like she's in her late 40s. She has a good figure and a sharp brain. She definitely checks age and won't see anyone under 30.
There's a lot to say for maturity. In my opinion late 30s and early 40s equates to an SP being in her prime.
There's a lot to say for maturity. In my opinion late 30s and early 40s equates to an SP being in her prime.
Along the same lines when I do see a SP I prefer one who is at least over 35. I have a daughter and the thought of hoping into bed with someone close to her age does not appeal to me.
I also believe that the older SP's are more inclined to take their time with a client as the younger, newbies, would be more of a wham-bam session....plus the closer the SP is to my age the easier it becomes to forget that you are paying for the time and believe it happening an the basis of mutual attraction.
As others have said, SP's do have preferences of who they might see. Not only age factors in, but race, ethnicity, etc as well. But at the end of the day it is their bodies, so they have a right to choose who they will see. I am sure that you will find one who will be comfortable seeing you.
For me personally, I am actually ok if they tell me directly with the reasoning. I am more annoyed if you as a potential client put so much time in writing them a decent message, but get no reply.
I think at least the MP/SP should give a Yes/No answer minimum. That shouldn't be too hard.
I guess in legal terms no but who is actually going to file a complaint with the Human Rights Board claiming an agency wouldn't send them an escort because they were under the age of 25?????
Overall an service is being provided and the provider should have the right to refuse just as a lawyer could refuse to take your case or a contractor may refuse to do the renovations you want.
be respectful to them n im sure they will see u.
i like young sps but milfs like me more lol...
is it mrs Loki ur talking about lol...
"Allowed to 'discriminate'"? In short, of course they are. You guys seem to be incredibly naïve.
Would you want an agency that accepts business from just anyone? An agency that allows clients with extremely poor hygiene? An agency that allows "party calls" where the girls is asked/forced into doing drugs with clients? An agency that allows clients who wants us to do car calls because the client doesn't want to pay for a room? An agency that puts girls in any uncomfortable situation just because the client feels that they don't have the right to be "discriminated" against?
If you have a doubt as to whether you will be serviced by a company or an escort, bring this up when you are making the appointment. Mention your age/circumstance and ask if the lady will be comfortable. At Cupid's, and hopefully at all agencies, the lady has the right to refusal with any client they don't wish to see.
You mean "guy" only one person asked if they can discriminate (the OP)..... everyone else has been saying yes.
To add to this some SPs won't go to people's homes only hotels. Some girls check to make sure that only one person will be there.
I stand corrected. We've seen this thread in many forms over the years, and there is almost always a vocal bunch who think the woman surrenders her right to refuse a client as long as he is willing to pay.
Jillian, well said as always.
OP - all escorts and agencies can and do discriminate. And that's just the way it is.
