Allure Massage

Apple now charting App Store iOS fragmentation just like Google's Android

The 1

New member
Sep 10, 2011
477
0
0
After first announcing that 93 percent of App Store customers are using the latest iOS 6 at WWDC last week, Apple has added the chart to its public developer site, mirroring Google's reporting of Android users in Google Play.




Apple now portrays the data in the same pie chart format at Google, drawing increased attention to the fact that on iOS, developers need only target the latest operating system. Apple also expects that adoption of iOS 7 will follow the rapid pace of previous releases, due in large part to the company's aggressive efforts to upgrade users and to prepare developers for the update.


Just 1 percent of Apple's App Store visitors still use a version older than iOS 5, released in October 2011. And only six percent are still using last year's iOS 5, the last version supported by the original 2010 iPad, 2009 iPod touch and 2008 iPhone 3G.

Google currently reports that as of June, the largest segment of Android devices are still running version 2.3 Gingerbread (36.5 percent), which was released in winter 2010. Another 4.8 percent use even older software.




Source: Google


Another 25.6 percent are still on Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, which was released the same month as iOS 5. Only 33 percent are running the latest major version, Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, which was announced last summer alongside Apple's debut of iOS 6.



And that's ignoring many Android shipments :confused:

Additionally, Google's statistics only look at those Android devices that regularly access Google Play, excluding Android-based products like Amazon's Kindle Fire and the millions of Android devices in China and other regions that don't use Google's services.

Google also began editing its numbers in March in response to comments by Apple's marketing chief Phil Schiller, who pointed out to Reuters that "with their own data, [Google reports] only 16 percent of Android users are on year-old version of the operating system. Over 50 percent are still on software that is two years old. A really big difference."

Two weeks later in its April report, Google made the necessary changes in its reporting to instantly inflate the proportion of its users reported to be using a less than year old version of Android and scale back the number of users reported to be stuck on a version from 2010 to be slightly below the 50 percent mark.



Two thirds of Android users can't use Google Now :frusty:

Android's advocates have long claimed that fragmentation isn't really a problem, while also trying to claim that Android's large global shipments position it as a larger platform for developers than Apple's iOS.

But even Google has been unable to roll out its apps and services across a significant number of Android users. For example, Google Now requires Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, meaning that 66 percent of active Google Play users can't even install it.

Adobe's Photoshop Touch requires Android 4.0, meaning only half the users in Google Play can use it.

Google, its hardware partners and the various mobile carriers also make it complex and in many cases impossible for users to obtain Android updates, even months after a new version is "released."

On the other hand, many developers simply ignore new features Google adds to Android. "More than six months have passed since Google first introduced its enhanced notifications in Android 4.1,"complainedMobileBurn. "It's disappointing that more apps haven't jumped on the bandwagon."

Apple's efforts to keep iOS users up to date have enabled quick developer uptake of new platform features in their apps, ranging from Notification Center to Game Center to Passbook.



New phones, old Android, no updates :biggrin1:

Additionally, unlike the Windows PC world, where even users who didn't want to upgrade to the newest OS version essentially had no choice when they bought a new Windows computer, Android licensees are still selling lots of handsets with very old versions of Android on them.

Verizon Wireless, for example, sells a variety of smartphones on its website that still ship with the ancient 2.3 Gingerbread, including the HTC Rhyme, LG Lucid and Spectrum, CASIO G’zOne Commando and Samsung Stratosphere. Users have to dig to see the actual specifications, because in many comparisons the OS is only specified as being "Android."

Verizon is not unique. In fact, very few phones ever ship with the latest release of Android installed. Even a year after Jelly Bean was unveiled last summer, many new phones are still shipping with Ice Cream Sandwich.

In stark contrast, Apple not only makes iOS updates immediately available, for free, to all of its users the same day it is released, but also continues to support its hardware with new iOS updates for at least two years after their initial release. And it doesn't sell new devices with outdated software that can't be upgraded.

For example, Apple continues to support iPhone 4, which was released back in 2010 when Android 2.2 was new. The phone will also run iOS 7 when it is launched this fall, giving it more than four years of updates.

In 2011, Google IO rolled out the "Google Update Alliance," a plan to ensure new Android smartphones would get software updates for at least 18 months after going on sale. The plan was declared dead before 2011 even ended. :faint:


http://appleinsider.com/articles/13...e-ios-fragmentation-just-like-googles-android
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
LMAO you guys love bringing up this fragmentation over and over, there must be a dozen threads on this lol but really Android owners don't give a frack.

Apple has it's own form of fragmentation that the charts don't show. not all features work on all iPhones. just because you have iOS 6 or 7 doesn't mean you have all the upgrade has to offer as older devices are left behind without the latest greatest not to mention more laggy and less responsive than with the iOS version originally delivered to the phone.

if you don't believe me then read Apples own support forums after each upgrade and see all the whining and complaining that happens with older phone owners.

with Android if your phones hardware won't support the features then you're stuck with an older OS. but even then Android owners can root their phones and install the latest.

oh btw djk how's that HTC One you love? I'm sure you're not worried about fragmentation are you?


http://slashdot.org/topic/cloud/androids-fragmentation-issue-isnt-hurting-it/
"But is Android’s fragmentation really hurting the platform? Not as far as global shipments are concerned. According to recent data from research firm IDC, Android’s market-share stood at 75 percent in the first quarter of 2013—up from 59.1 percent in the same quarter a year ago. Meanwhile, iOS owned 17.3 percent of the market—compared to 23.1 percent in the year-ago quarter."

so Android increased 16% year over year and Apple decreased 6% yikes I guess Windows Phone and Blackberry are eating into their profits after all ;)
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
LMAO you guys love bringing up this fragmentation over and over, there must be a dozen threads on this lol but really Android owners don't give a frack.

Apple has it's own form of fragmentation that the charts don't show. not all features work on all iPhones. just because you have iOS 6 or 7 doesn't mean you have all the upgrade has to offer as older devices are left behind without the latest greatest not to mention more laggy and less responsive than with the iOS version originally delivered to the phone.

if you don't believe me then read Apples own support forums after each upgrade and see all the whining and complaining that happens with older phone owners.

with Android if your phones hardware won't support the features then you're stuck with an older OS. but even then Android owners can root their phones and install the latest.

oh btw djk how's that HTC One you love? I'm sure you're not worried about fragmentation are you?


http://slashdot.org/topic/cloud/androids-fragmentation-issue-isnt-hurting-it/
"But is Android’s fragmentation really hurting the platform? Not as far as global shipments are concerned. According to recent data from research firm IDC, Android’s market-share stood at 75 percent in the first quarter of 2013—up from 59.1 percent in the same quarter a year ago. Meanwhile, iOS owned 17.3 percent of the market—compared to 23.1 percent in the year-ago quarter."

so Android increased 16% year over year and Apple decreased 6% yikes I guess Windows Phone and Blackberry are eating into their profits after all ;)
Spin hamster spin!
 

d_jedi

New member
Sep 5, 2005
8,765
1
0
Typical cell contract in Canada is 3 years. It should be standard, then, that all phones in Canada are supported with software updates, etc. for 3 years.
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
Spin hamster spin!
you see spin, while I see the other side of the fence...go figure.
heaven forbid the worlds greatest marketing company would never take to "spinning" a story. lmao

oh btw, you never answered my question if you personally are worried about fragmentation on your beautiful HTC One?
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
Typical cell contract in Canada is 3 years. It should be standard, then, that all phones in Canada are supported with software updates, etc. for 3 years.
recently Canada introduced laws limiting contracts to 2 years. which is what all of the major manufacturers have promised updates for. but aside from full upgrades ie ios 6 to ios 7 or android 4.0 to 5.0 the core apps within are generally updated far beyond the life of your phone. you just don't get the new stuff added to the OS, mainly due to hardware constraints.

Android won't give you a full upgrade OS unless your phone supports all the new features.
Apple will give you an OS upgrade but leave out features they deem not compatible with your hardware. I call that iOS fragmentation. what good is iOS 7 to you if you don't get the cool new features and risk your phone becoming laggy or less responsive. better to stick with the older one... no?


and btw Apple have already said iOS 7 will not be issued to phones earlier than iPhone 4and iPad 2. you are about to see that chart above change dramatically as there are still millions using 3gs phones and iPad 1's. I still even see refurbished ones being sold at factory direct and other places and because they are so cheap, they sell lots.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism

danibbler

Active member
Feb 2, 2002
2,269
0
36
Toronto
LMAO you guys love bringing up this fragmentation over and over, there must be a dozen threads on this lol but really Android owners don't give a frack.
As an Android owner (Samsung Galaxy S 1) I do. I was out of date within a year!
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
As an Android owner (Samsung Galaxy S 1) I do. I was out of date within a year!
Hey nibs, simply do a quick Google search and you'll find all kinds of how to sites and videos for unlocking,rooting and flashing new roms onto your device. I recommend looking for liquidsmooth Android 4.2 rom(yep the latest version of Android) From the video I saw all the features were working and it was very responsive and fluid.
for a first timer to flashing it will take you about an hour to unlock/backup/root and flash your new rom. best part is no more touchwiz :)

I also remember you complaining about battery life. there are many shops in town where you can pick up a spare battery for about $20 or charger and battery for about $30.

I'll even take it one step further if your unsure or don't like mucking about with these things, for the cost of a coffee near my downtown condo I'll do it all for you(seriously) it won't take long and I can teach you to do it yourself for future upgrades or different roms.
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,140
2,468
113
Appleinsider is right on the money, as usual.
Odd ... that wasn't my experience. I had to jailbreak my iPhone to get some of the features that iPhone 4 had. The one's I didn't have to jailbreak (which I did anyway), like my iPhone location service wasn't available unless I paid a monthly service charge.

I think some guys here are such Apple addicts that they probably traded up to the latest and greatest without having to hold on to their older iPhones as Apple applied pressure to upgrade. For those who dared to Jailbreak to load our own (non- Apple improved apps) - we had to fight Apple's relentless attempts to thwart jailbreaks with each nominally improved release. If you were an individual with an Apple device - new releases were always a problem not a help.

BTW: Apple Insider - you really expect a chorus of regimented Apple users - spoon fed their apps through Apple could possibly give an insightful viewpoint of the freedom offered by Android ? It's like the North Koreans writing about the evils of western democracy.
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
here is how iOS is fragmented and not reflected in their pie charts.


this chart shows the difference of models running iOS6
it's expected that when iOS 7 arrives none of those devices will run ALL of the new features.
2nd gen iPad and iPhone 3GS will not run it at all.
 

The 1

New member
Sep 10, 2011
477
0
0
here is how iOS is fragmented and not reflected in their pie charts.

this chart shows the difference of models running iOS6
it's expected that when iOS 7 arrives none of those devices will run ALL of the new features.
2nd gen iPad and iPhone 3GS will not run it at all.
FWIW, the issue is not about what feature runs or not on different hardware. It's how developers have to code their programs using different APIs to compile their codes in order to run on all versions of Android OS's.

It forces developer to either release multiple versions of their own programs or just one depending the percentage of users.

Think of it like someone who writes a program for Windows XP but can't be installed or run on Windows 8.

Your chart above, of course, shows the hardware capabilities of various Apple devices only.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
FWIW, the issue is not about what feature runs or not on different hardware. It's how developers have to code their programs using different APIs to compile their codes in order to run on all versions of Android OS's.

It forces developer to either release multiple versions of their own programs or just one depending the percentage of users.

Think of it like someone who writes a program for Windows XP but can't be installed or run on Windows 8.

Your chart above, of course, shows the hardware capabilities of various Apple devices only.
Excellent point, the 1.

In addition, one of the major reasons why Android users should demand Google resolve fragmentation on their platform.

http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/the-android-fragmentation-problem/

One of the biggest issues of the Android OS is its fragmentation problem. We’ve covered this before – about how almost all Android updates have to pass through both device manufacturers and service providers before getting to end users. Unfortunately, this process is not quick or assured, which results in fragmentation: multiple versions of Android are present and in use.

This results in a many users being stuck with an outdated version of Android that may be riddled with vulnerabilities and security flaws. As of May 1, only 2.3% of Android devices in use are actually on the latest version, with more than a third still using Gingerbread – a version last updated in September 2011, and known to have 3-11 vulnerabilities, with the exact number depending on the specific version.
 
Toronto Escorts