Angel's Touch, Kelly etc

[Drummer59]

Hi all:

It seems I created a stir by making my comment on Kelly at Angel's Touch. I am somewhat of a rookie with this site. At the time I wrote my thread, I couldn't figure out how to post a new thread so I replied to Scotts. I am not sure what a shill is, I just posted my experience with Kelly. I did this on my own and wasn't asked to do it, nor was I trying to go against Scott who didn't have as good an experience with her as I did. We all have different rapport with different ladies I guess. I would also like to say that Cheryl at Angel's Touch is terrific also. I have had nothing but good experiences with both her and Kelly. If I offended anyone, I certainly didn't mean to so I apologize. I just wanted to state my honest opinion. Hope this clears things up

 

[toine]

D59, here is a definition of a shill: a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.
It will often happen to first time posters to be called a shill when they report a positive experience in a thread that is somewhat not-so-positive. There is actually not that much shilling going on here, but it does happen.
Don't let that bother you, keep on hobbying and reporting and you'll get to establish a bit of a reputation here...

 

[blackram]

I am not sure what a shill is, I just posted my experience with Kelly.

A shill is somebody who pretends to be a customer but is actually working/advocating for a business, to make it look like they are a satisfied independent customer. It's not unusual to be called a shill on your first post, especially when your first post is a review. However, that's par for the course, even I've been accused of being a shill when I had my first postings at various forums. The accusations usually go away after you've participated in several different discussions and reviewed different girls from several different businesses. Basically you need to earn credibility here.

At the time I wrote my thread, I couldn't figure out how to post a new thread so I replied to Scotts.

Yeah, I don't think you did anything wrong there, by replying to an existing thread. But again you simply need to earn your credibility here.

 

[Drummer59]

Thanks for the clarification Toine and Blackram. I appreciate your response. Makes sense on the concept of having to establish credibility on this site. I am all for that.