Angel Archer & Subdave

Re: did you PM ?

angietoronto said:
PM her she may respond, i can understand why sp's don't like to post.

Angel Archer is a 'deleted user'. I guess both archer and dave are not on the boards anymore.....I guess I could call them or email them to see how they are doing.
 
Re: Amgel Aurora

dickydoem said:
Angel Aurora is listed as a junior member having no posts. I know that she quite a number so I guess they were all deleted. Just wondered why?

Looks like she cancelled her old account and then signed up again.
 
Ref said:
David is a wonderful person who was not afraid to bare his real feelings to the board.

TERB is less of a place without him.
I quite agree.
But Ref and I are just low count newbies.

I think this board is too conservative for Ricarghl (SP?) to last much longer also.
Words are just words aren't they ? The ideas conjured are also only ideas and some were contrived to make us think outside our normal boundaries. What do we think of words like asshat and farkhead and vaguely amusing comments about a certain mods' mother ?
Yeah, sure. And Dave's stuff was amusing AND MIND EXPANDING too.

Edit posts, fine. Delete offensive threads, fine.
Censor posts, my gawd how silly, but ok if want to pretend no other boards exist.
Draconian measures like banning shouldn't be taken without at least a slight consultation of the user pool.
JMO of course.
 
Thank you.
I had already read that thread.

The descriptive phrase: "raping your cousin's 3 and 6 year olds" is contained here and the post above also so I assume you must have decided that the context was more offensive than the idea.
Did this context make you decide he was a danger to society or just to this board ?
Or was it just personally distasteful ?
Hey, we all have different cutoff points. :)
Some people would have burned Douglas Adams at the stake.

By the way, he was also
GloryHoleGlorya and SlurpRamp
Ray if you remember them...


That was pretty amusing stuff if it really was Dave - who was that in the pictures I wonder ?
 
Yes, context is important. Note the quotes around the statement. It was a direct quote to show the severity of the statement.

Yes, it was personally distasteful, but it also was violative of the rules of the board. And that's what dictates.