Garden of Eden Escorts
Toronto Escorts

4 major CRTC decisions that will impact your cellphone, TV and Internet bills in 2017

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
Openmedia is a good source of info. They were fighting for the consumers few years ago when they wanted to cut unlimited.

TORONTO — Canadians pay some of the highest prices in the world for their cellphone, Internet and TV services, but those bills could change depending on how Canada’s broadcast regulator handles some major issues it’s expected to decide on next year.

The CRTC has several important hearings, reviews and rulings expected in 2017. Here’s a look at four of them:

Differential Pricing
In the fall, the CRTC held a weeklong hearing examining differential pricing, which occurs when a company offers customers the same or similar products at different prices. Specifically, the regulator looked at how Internet service providers use differential pricing with their data plans.

The review came following complaints that some companies were not including certain music and video streaming services toward customer data plans, thereby acting as gatekeepers, influencing consumption and making it difficult for some providers to enter the marketplace. OpenMedia, a consumer advocacy group, has been calling for the elimination of data caps on home and wireless Internet plans. Others, however, argue the practice gives customers more choice.

The CRTC is expected to set out a policy governing differential pricing next year.
Wholesale Internet Rates
The CRTC will set final rates for what Bell, Rogers, Telus, SaskTel, Shaw, Cogeco, MTS and Videotron must charge smaller companies for access to their high-speed networks. The smaller service providers rely on those networks to offer Internet, TV and telephone services.

The regulator set interim rates in October that were mostly lower — in some cases by up to 89 per cent — than what many of the incumbents wanted to charge. The CRTC says it’s setting the fees to help foster competition.

If the final fees remain close to the interim ones, the smaller companies could pass on the savings to consumers by lowering their prices. That could put pressure on the bigger companies to follow suit.

However, some of the incumbents have warned that low fees may slow or halt their broadband network investment — a threat some experts take with a grain of salt.

The final rates are expected in the first half of 2017.
Wireless Code Review
In February, the CRTC will hold a hearing to determine whether the wireless code of conduct, which took effect in December 2013, needs to be improved.

After hearing from the public, the regulator created the code in part to help consumers understand their plans better, prevent bill shock, shorten contract lengths and lower cancellation fees.

The CRTC started gathering feedback on the effectiveness of the code in September and will accept more submissions from the public between Feb. 6 and 14.

So far, it has heard complaints about high prices, surprise charges, phone unlocking fees and wireless data limits, among other issues. If the CRTC concludes the code needs to be updated, some of those gripes could be addressed.
Basic Telecommunications Services
Last year, the CRTC launched its review of basic telecommunications services. It sought to determine which ones Canadians need to have to be able to meaningfully participate in the digital economy, as well as what the CRTC’s role is in ensuring all Canadians have affordable service options available to them.

OpenMedia argued high-speed Internet access should be redefined as a basic service. Currently, low-speed Internet, individual line touch-tone phone service, a printed copy of the current phone book on request, and a number of phone services, including emergency, fall into that category.

It called on the CRTC to give all Canadians access to broadband Internet for $30 monthly, and to provide better, more affordable access to the country’s remote and rural communities where broadband investment has lagged.

The review could determine sufficient upload and download speeds, and create funding mechanisms to support the ability to supply modern telecommunications services.

A spokeswoman for the CRTC says a decision may come before the end of the year.

http://business.financialpost.com/f...tv-and-internet-bills-in-2017?__lsa=d7cb-32c4
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
This whole area is way too confusing. I was told it would cost $18 to get just one channel (TSN). Plus, the base price of $25. That is $43 just to get one channel I want.
 

Twister

Well-known member
Aug 24, 2002
4,605
382
83
GTA
This whole area is way too confusing. I was told it would cost $18 to get just one channel (TSN). Plus, the base price of $25. That is $43 just to get one channel I want.
Seems its cheaper to get service in 3rd world countries than here, they rip us off with a vengeance. They're doing it on purpose so you buy a more expensive package. Get a digital antenna and a android box or an iptv box and fuckem.
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,590
213
63
The Keebler Factory
This whole area is way too confusing. I was told it would cost $18 to get just one channel (TSN). Plus, the base price of $25. That is $43 just to get one channel I want.
To be more accurate, you may only want one channel but that channel comes in a bundle (probably sports) that costs $18. You're getting all the other channels in that bundle and in the basic package (whether you want them or not).

But agreed, there is no way to buy just one channel you want. And as much as I hate to say it, it's not surprising that the cable company doesn't want to give customers the option to select only the channels they want. That would result in only the most popular (and profitable) channels being available and everything else would disappear. And I don't mean the fishing channel goes bye-bye, I mean cable companies would slash and burn to only the barest of bones channels to maximize their return on. To some extent consumers have to pay for more than just the individual channels they want in order to provide a selection to choose from.

It will all be moot soon anyways as we move to a non-cable model.
 

Capital Amatuer

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2004
1,125
618
113
Where are the sports packages purchased ? From the leagues. True, some of the cost is offset by revenues collected by advertisers. But the leagues/team must earn substantial revenues to pay the actors or athletes the contracts. How many consumers think my cable bill is going to cost me more because a studio or team signed precedent setting contracts with famous actors or elite players ?
I think there is a connection between how much actors/athletes earn and how much my cable costs.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
Rogers has given up on IPTV, wrote off $500mm and will now partner with Comcast on something.
 

Lady fisher

Member
Oct 13, 2015
174
0
16
TV package

This whole area is way too confusing. I was told it would cost $18 to get just one channel (TSN). Plus, the base price of $25. That is $43 just to get one channel I want.
I went back to the way it was the 25 channel deal is terrible

you cannot get this channel without getting this one

cable companies know which channels are premium watched channels

and somehow mysteriously one channel short of a load of 5 picks in a group and you want 6

I went back to the original package and got a $5 discount off the bill since I was a long term customer whoopteedo lol

internet and TV $110 a month taxes in
 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
3,628
627
113
I went back to the way it was the 25 channel deal is terrible

you cannot get this channel without getting this one

cable companies know which channels are premium watched channels

and somehow mysteriously one channel short of a load of 5 picks in a group and you want 6

I went back to the original package and got a $5 discount off the bill since I was a long term customer whoopteedo lol

internet and TV $110 a month taxes in
People get addicted to TV and their favorites channels. You may want to call Rogers back, they're offering Cable, Internet and home phone for $99 based on a 2 year contract.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,929
7
38
Here's what I do:

TV: Basic cable for around $40. Years back, I did a rent to own deal with a Rogers store, so after 3 years the box is mine. It was a good deal. I pay less per month than renting, but it's mine after 3 years? Ok, I'll take it. I guess the drawback is that I'm stuck with this cable box model. Fine with me

More channels: I just find internet streams that do it. Yeah, the quality isn't as good as a TV feed direct from the cable box, but I don't see value paying for Rogers VIP or any one those $80+ packages for only a few more channels I care about like TSN. For good quality sports feeds, search Reddit threads.

If Rogers didn't gauge with stupid packages, I'd have no problem sticking with them, but these places jam down your throat tons of useless channels. Looking at their individual picks, it's not a good deal either because if you pick some channels bit by bit, the price gets you back to a higher tier package.

If Rogers had let's say gave a better price on bundles or let me choose my own set of channels for let's say $50/mth I'd do it. Then again, I might just dump cable entirely and go with internet feeds.

Cable TV is a weird industry. When you buy food or clothes, stores don't say.... "well, if you want those jeans, you also have to buy a matching sweater, socks and coat to go with it". If you want jeans, then you can just buy jeans. If Rogers had a simple offer like.... pay $2 per channel, no restrictions, I'd be all over that. I'd buy maybe 15 channels and I'd be lifetime customer. I guess that's what happens when you have regional monopolies and the government has no balls to offer better deals like the rest of the world.... typical Canadian pushover government.

Internet: Independent. $50/mth unlimited. I ripped myself off, I should have done the $40/mth 200 gb/mth plan, but I thought I would eat up tons of space doing Netflix. By the time, I wanted to change, they increased all plans $10, but I stuck with my plan which they haven't increased..... I guess I'm getting this plan/price forever which is fine. And I own the router, so I don't get nickel and dimed $5/mth. It cost me $80 and it's mine forever. The internet service is just as fast and good than when I did Rogers shitty $60gb/mth plan at $60. I get unlimited, faster bandwidth, and $10 cheaper. And the modem is mine and hasn't failed in 3 years.

Phone: Don't know. I have a company phone and haven't had my own personal phone for probably 15 years.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts